Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Got to be kidding. Two FT vs. 40 missed shots - you ability to discern what's important does not exist.Originally posted by Hawkfan76:
Pretty stupid to get a T in a close game like that. Also players played like sh.t outside of white.
Originally posted by GatoradeBrain:
Did Fran's reaction even warrant a technical? It was a pretty quick call by the official. Honest question as I didn't get to see what Fran did.
6 point swing there.
No, the fact that he kept Woodbury in there too long cost us more than the T did.Originally posted by Hawkfan76:
Pretty stupid to get a T in a close game like that. Also players played like sh.t outside of white.
Originally posted by GatoradeBrain:
Did Fran's reaction even warrant a technical? It was a pretty quick call by the official. Honest question as I didn't get to see what Fran did.
6 point swing there.
Originally posted by LinusPF:
Originally posted by GatoradeBrain:
Did Fran's reaction even warrant a technical? It was a pretty quick call by the official. Honest question as I didn't get to see what Fran did.
6 point swing there.
Quick call? Are you kidding?
Ref ran by him and looked back two or three times. Ref was all the way to other end of the court before the "T" was called. Heck four or five seconds passed.
So is Olaseni the only 6'10" guy that can't finish around the rim?Originally posted by Fatsohawk:
No, the fact that he kept Woodbury in there too long cost us more than the T did.Originally posted by Hawkfan76:
Pretty stupid to get a T in a close game like that. Also players played like sh.t outside of white.
Only 7-1 guy in NCAA basketball that can't finish around the rim. Sad.
That shot had absolutely no chance of going it - buuuuut, the ball was still contacting the rim when the PSU guy palmed it. Blatant goal tending that 99.99999% of the time would be and should be called.Originally posted by LifelongHawk:
I'm not as certain as y'all seem to be that it was such a bad call. Haven't, and won't, take the time to review footage frame by frame, but on first view I don't think the shot still had a chance to go in.
In order to be goaltending, the ball must be above the rim. What may have happened is that the ball was already missed and coming off below the rim. The PSU guy's momentum grabbing it took it back up onto the rim. Obviously if he had originally touched the ball in the spot he took it too, goaltend, but when he first contacted the ball it might have already been a missed shot.
Still hate that Fran thinks when he is mad a tantrum is the way to go; that T was costly. Some seem calculated, but that was just a tantrum.
Here's the applicable part of the rule:Originally posted by stillh8unlv:
That shot had absolutely no chance of going it - buuuuut, the ball was still contacting the rim when the PSU guy palmed it. Blatant goal tending that 99.99999% of the time would be and should be called.Originally posted by LifelongHawk:
I'm not as certain as y'all seem to be that it was such a bad call. Haven't, and won't, take the time to review footage frame by frame, but on first view I don't think the shot still had a chance to go in.
In order to be goaltending, the ball must be above the rim. What may have happened is that the ball was already missed and coming off below the rim. The PSU guy's momentum grabbing it took it back up onto the rim. Obviously if he had originally touched the ball in the spot he took it too, goaltend, but when he first contacted the ball it might have already been a missed shot.
Still hate that Fran thinks when he is mad a tantrum is the way to go; that T was costly. Some seem calculated, but that was just a tantrum.
I not certain it was a goal tend either. Even if it was,Fran getting a technical was stupid and costly.Originally posted by LifelongHawk:
I'm not as certain as y'all seem to be that it was such a bad call. Haven't, and won't, take the time to review footage frame by frame, but on first view I don't think the shot still had a chance to go in.
In order to be goaltending, the ball must be above the rim. What may have happened is that the ball was already missed and coming off below the rim. The PSU guy's momentum grabbing it took it back up onto the rim. Obviously if he had originally touched the ball in the spot he took it too, goaltend, but when he first contacted the ball it might have already been a missed shot.
Still hate that Fran thinks when he is mad a tantrum is the way to go; that T was costly. Some seem calculated, but that was just a tantrum.
Yeah well I'm gonna say it was a goaltend because it makes me feel better.Originally posted by LifelongHawk:
Here's the applicable part of the rule:Originally posted by stillh8unlv:
That shot had absolutely no chance of going it - buuuuut, the ball was still contacting the rim when the PSU guy palmed it. Blatant goal tending that 99.99999% of the time would be and should be called.Originally posted by LifelongHawk:
I'm not as certain as y'all seem to be that it was such a bad call. Haven't, and won't, take the time to review footage frame by frame, but on first view I don't think the shot still had a chance to go in.
In order to be goaltending, the ball must be above the rim. What may have happened is that the ball was already missed and coming off below the rim. The PSU guy's momentum grabbing it took it back up onto the rim. Obviously if he had originally touched the ball in the spot he took it too, goaltend, but when he first contacted the ball it might have already been a missed shot.
Still hate that Fran thinks when he is mad a tantrum is the way to go; that T was costly. Some seem calculated, but that was just a tantrum.
Section I-A Player Shall Not:
a. Touch the ball or the basket ring when the ball is using the basket ring as its lower base.
EXCEPTION: If a player near his own basket has his hand legally in contact with the ball, it is not a violation if his contact with the ball continues after the ball enters the cylinder, or if, in such action, he touches the basket.
b. Touch the ball when it is above the basket ring and within the imaginary cylinder.
c. For goaltending to occur, the ball, in the judgment of the official, must have a chance to score.
I saw a missed shot with no chance of going in and probably also below the rim. Under c, not a goaltend when he contacted the ball. The exception then applies to him carrying/pushing the ball back up on the rim. So, no goaltend.
It was neither goaltending nor should the technical have been called. T was a bad call by the zebra.Originally posted by rillo 62:
I not certain it was a goal tend either. Even if it was,Fran getting a technical was stupid and costly.Originally posted by LifelongHawk:
I'm not as certain as y'all seem to be that it was such a bad call. Haven't, and won't, take the time to review footage frame by frame, but on first view I don't think the shot still had a chance to go in.
In order to be goaltending, the ball must be above the rim. What may have happened is that the ball was already missed and coming off below the rim. The PSU guy's momentum grabbing it took it back up onto the rim. Obviously if he had originally touched the ball in the spot he took it too, goaltend, but when he first contacted the ball it might have already been a missed shot.
Still hate that Fran thinks when he is mad a tantrum is the way to go; that T was costly. Some seem calculated, but that was just a tantrum.
After watching it again,i agree it wasn't goaltending. As far as the T, Fran shook his fist stalked the official down the sideline well outside the coaches box,all the while screaming something at him for a call he got right? Seems to me the Technical was more then justified.Originally posted by Roy Ellefson:
It was neither goaltending nor should the technical have been called. T was a bad call by the zebra.Originally posted by rillo 62:
I not certain it was a goal tend either. Even if it was,Fran getting a technical was stupid and costly.Originally posted by LifelongHawk:
I'm not as certain as y'all seem to be that it was such a bad call. Haven't, and won't, take the time to review footage frame by frame, but on first view I don't think the shot still had a chance to go in.
In order to be goaltending, the ball must be above the rim. What may have happened is that the ball was already missed and coming off below the rim. The PSU guy's momentum grabbing it took it back up onto the rim. Obviously if he had originally touched the ball in the spot he took it too, goaltend, but when he first contacted the ball it might have already been a missed shot.
Still hate that Fran thinks when he is mad a tantrum is the way to go; that T was costly. Some seem calculated, but that was just a tantrum.