Frost and NE 5-7 for 2018

[LaQuintaHawkeye]

I'm pretty disappointed in most of you falling for the trolling. There are probably 5 Neb trolls, each with a half-dozen (or more) fake handles, coming on here to stir the pot; yet you get all bent out of shape and label their entire fan base as deluded and living in the 90s.

While that may realistically apply to 10-15% of their fan base, I've met many a Neb fan in person, and none of them actually thought this way. They were a lot like us, just hoping to be relevant each year, and, yes, with a few breaks, have a chance to contend for a conference championship.

I have yet to meet one that said, "With the right coach we'll be back playing for national championship on a regular basis."

Bottom line, please stop feeding these trolls.

 

[Blackleaf40]

Henrich is going gold. You pussies on here are so insecure. You beat the piss out of some of the Huskers worst teams. Hell, Pelini had a winning record against you.

No score for the Iowa game. I think Nebraska wins though. You don't have quality skill players and the back end on your defense is weak.

Your offensive line is heavy and unathletic. They are good at power runs, but they're not good at pulling or finding the second block. Win, lose... whatever. This will be a fun game to watch.

How's YOUR o-line? Buttery as ever? Frost's scheme is predicated on a QB who's got time to pick and choose targets which works so well in the B1G.

The last I saw, your DL gets gassed out against heavy run teams and all but quits by the 4th. I don't forsee anything changing there as Nebraska continues to bring a knife to a gunfight.

Iowa by three touchdowns and that's being generous.

Am I buying into the Frost hype?

 

[ROCKY MOUNTAIN HAWK]

If Rocky would post something somewhat smart I would half ass consider him a serious fan.

Why, do you REALLY think Neb is better than Ill? I’d have to say no.

Not that there’s that much difference between 13th & 14th place.

 

[BlackNGoldBleeder]

Henrich is going gold. You pussies on here are so insecure. You beat the piss out of some of the Huskers worst teams. Hell, Pelini had a winning record against you.

No score for the Iowa game. I think Nebraska wins though. You don't have quality skill players and the back end on your defense is weak.

Your offensive line is heavy and unathletic. They are good at power runs, but they're not good at pulling or finding the second block. Win, lose... whatever. This will be a fun game to watch.

Nothing screams bad ass like a guy who can go on an anonymous message board and type pussies.

Nothing demonstrates stupid more than a Nebraska fan trying to assess the Iowa football team's strengths and weaknesses. Lol. WTF?

About the only stereotype of Husker fans you missed is your post was actually halfway literate.

 

[Noble Hawk]

Come back to this thread in a couple years and see where the West stands. It will be different, in a good way, with better competition.
To ignore the youth, success and popularity of a young Frost to recruits is a mistake. They are offering a ridiculous number of recruits to get their foot in the door and keep Ne in top prospects eye. All recruits know Oregon for their fast offense and unis. They will, even if they haven't already, soon know Frost was a part of it. Whether he sinks or swims he will do so with a lot of the eyes that matter watching.

This has been tried before in the Big Ten by a better school (Michigan) and a better coach (Rich Rod). Spread RPO offense with mediocre to poor defense? Good luck with that.

 

[kentadel]

This has been tried before in the Big Ten by a better school (Michigan) and a better coach (Rich Rod). Spread RPO offense with mediocre to poor defense? Good luck with that.

Time will tell.

 

[ThrowBones92]

I have no doubt Frost is an improvement over Riley. I have no doubt that Frost will have Nebbie scoring points. What I do have doubts about is whether Frost's defense will be able to stand toe to toe with power football teams like Wisconsin and Iowa. The fast break offensive teams rarely play good defense (See the big 12). They play fast, they're defense will scrimmage against the spread it out play fast offense everyday in practice, so when they get in a fist fight like they will be in with Bucky and Herky, there Defense could get knocked on there asses. I could be wrong, but I am still grateful that Frost is Nebbies coach instead of Beilema.

I think that you make a good point about the development of the defense. I have no doubt that he will change the mentality of the players - I don't think the defense will play soft. But, as you say, when you don't practice against a certain type of offense every day, your defense can struggle playing against it in games.

I do wonder if the inverse is also true for other defenses in the league. Part of what I think he is betting on is that if he can score enough points, then the ground and pound schemes will be forced to play perfect ball control or they'll be playing from behind. If he can score enough points, he can get offenses who normally are very committed to running the ball to have to throw more to score faster. It's one of the reasons Pelini was so successful with his defnese in the Big 12. Those offenses were committed to throwing the football. His defensive scheme's achilles was stopping the run, but he banked on teams not staying committed to the run, and that happened a lot. I remember watching teams gain chunk yardage on the ground on Nebraska in the Big 12, but they always bailed and went back to throwing the football, and that is when Pelini had a lot of success creating turnovers and 2nd and long and 3rd and long situations. It's an interesting look into the psychology and discipline of coaches. Both philosophies work if you execute them correctly, so it will be interesting to see how things work in the B1G in the upcoming years.

I personally prefer a more physical style of offense, but I can't impact that decision, so I'll be hopeful for Scott's offense to have success.

 

[ThrowBones92]

This has been tried before in the Big Ten by a better school (Michigan) and a better coach (Rich Rod). Spread RPO offense with mediocre to poor defense? Good luck with that.

LOL a better coach. I know YOU don't even believe that.

 

[iahawkeyes17]

LOL a better coach. I know YOU don't even believe that.

Big 10 fans we mostly remember him flaming out at Michigan and then going on to fairly good success at Arizona before getting canned for off field issues this season. But before coming to Michigan at WVU Rich rod was considered one of the top young coaches in the nation. He was 60-26 overall and 34-14 in big east conference play (with a 3-8, 1-6 conf in 1st season) 4 conference titles in 7 seasons. In 05’ had they not blown last game of season vs Pitt would have played for a national title.

He came to Michigan with a lot of buzz for spread offense WVU ran differing from most of big 10 as a hot young successful coach. There were big questions on his Michigan’s roster would adapt to the changes of schemes on both sides of thr ball and how it would fare in the big 10 and how long it would take to before they started having success. He had brought in the blue chip California qb with Tate forcier who’d many thought would lead the way. Lot of publicity leading up that summer and fall before his first season in Ann Arbor. Does most of this Sound familiar?

Unfortunately for rich rod he only had 3 years and never quite had the qb success and hoke benefited after him with dennard Robinson who was brought in along with forcier for his upperclassman years.

 

[Noble Hawk]

LOL a better coach. I know YOU don't even believe that.

Look at the two coaches resumes when they got the jobs at Michigan and Nebraska. There is not a person in America that is not a Nebraska fan that will say Scott Frost is a more accomplished coach than Rich Rod was in 2007.

 

[scotthawk1964]

I think that you make a good point about the development of the defense. I have no doubt that he will change the mentality of the players - I don't think the defense will play soft. But, as you say, when you don't practice against a certain type of offense every day, your defense can struggle playing against it in games.

I do wonder if the inverse is also true for other defenses in the league. Part of what I think he is betting on is that if he can score enough points, then the ground and pound schemes will be forced to play perfect ball control or they'll be playing from behind. If he can score enough points, he can get offenses who normally are very committed to running the ball to have to throw more to score faster. It's one of the reasons Pelini was so successful with his defnese in the Big 12. Those offenses were committed to throwing the football. His defensive scheme's achilles was stopping the run, but he banked on teams not staying committed to the run, and that happened a lot. I remember watching teams gain chunk yardage on the ground on Nebraska in the Big 12, but they always bailed and went back to throwing the football, and that is when Pelini had a lot of success creating turnovers and 2nd and long and 3rd and long situations. It's an interesting look into the psychology and discipline of coaches. Both philosophies work if you execute them correctly, so it will be interesting to see how things work in the B1G in the upcoming years.

I personally prefer a more physical style of offense, but I can't impact that decision, so I'll be hopeful for Scott's offense to have success.

Your correct as other Big defenses will have to adjust to that style of offense. I think Iowa vs tOSU last season was a good look at what happens when a team does not play a power team very often. tOSU had played all spread teams up to the Iowa game, and granted, I don't think tOSU had there best game, but offensively Iowa did whatever they wanted. I guess we'll all find out very soon. LOL Most of the top teams in the Big play pretty good defense.

 

[ThrowBones92]

Look at the two coaches resumes when they got the jobs at Michigan and Nebraska. There is not a person in America that is not a Nebraska fan that will say Scott Frost is a more accomplished coach than Rich Rod was in 2007.

I didn't LOL at "more accomplished". You inserted that word, not me. I LOL'd at "better", because that is the word the poster used.

RichRod did well at WVU in the weakest "Power" conference in the country. He had a .698 winning percentage in 7 seasons at WVU. Although, his predecessor produced a .612 winning percentage in the 21 seasons prior to RichRod becoming head coach, so its not like he came in and turned the WVU program around, per se.

Since then, in 9 season as a head coach, he's a .500 football coach (54-53), and he's won more than 8 games exactly once since his time at WVU. Including his time at WVU, he's coached in one more "BCS/NY6" bowl than Frost, and he's won the exact same number of as Frost - one.

Regarding his success at WVU:
RichRod had a .701 winning percentage in 7 season at WVU in the Big East.
RichRod's successors had a .712 winning percentage in 4 seasons at WVU in the Big East.
Since WVU left the Big East, WVU has a .558 winning percentage (43-34) in a tougher league that plays the same style of football that WVU does.

My point is that he is a lifetime .587 winning percentage coach with the same number of BCS/NY6 bowl wins as Frost, even though he was a head coach for 16 years and Frost has been a head coach for 2 years. Depending on your metric, he's more accomplished (total wins? So is Mike Riley. BCS/NYC6 wins? No). The stats don't really back up that he's a "better" coach than Frost. Time will tell.

 

[ThrowBones92]

Your correct as other Big defenses will have to adjust to that style of offense. I think Iowa vs tOSU last season was a good look at what happens when a team does not play a power team very often. tOSU had played all spread teams up to the Iowa game, and granted, I don't tOSU had there best game. I guess we'll all find out very soon. LOL Most of the top teams in the Big play pretty good defense.

It certainly will be interesting to see how teams approach each other. Looking forward to more competitive games in a few years!

What do you think allowed Iowa to have success against tOSU's offense in that game? How would you compare PSU's offense to OSU's? I didn't watch the Iowa vs OSU game, but I did watch the Iowa vs PSU game. So I'm not able to compare the two.

 

[beatdahuskers]

UN fans have an inferiority complex, and it's fully justified.

 

[kentadel]

I didn't LOL at "more accomplished". You inserted that word, not me. I LOL'd at "better", because that is the word the poster used.

RichRod did well at WVU in the weakest "Power" conference in the country. He had a .698 winning percentage in 7 seasons at WVU. Although, his predecessor produced a .612 winning percentage in the 21 seasons prior to RichRod becoming head coach, so its not like he came in and turned the WVU program around, per se.

Since then, in 9 season as a head coach, he's a .500 football coach (54-53), and he's won more than 8 games exactly once since his time at WVU. Including his time at WVU, he's coached in one more "BCS/NY6" bowl than Frost, and he's won the exact same number of as Frost - one.

Regarding his success at WVU:
RichRod had a .701 winning percentage in 7 season at WVU in the Big East.
RichRod's successors had a .712 winning percentage in 4 seasons at WVU in the Big East.
Since WVU left the Big East, WVU has a .558 winning percentage (43-34) in a tougher league that plays the same style of football that WVU does.

My point is that he is a lifetime .587 winning percentage coach with the same number of BCS/NY6 bowl wins as Frost, even though he was a head coach for 16 years and Frost has been a head coach for 2 years. Depending on your metric, he's more accomplished (total wins? So is Mike Riley. BCS/NYC6 wins? No). The stats don't really back up that he's a "better" coach than Frost. Time will tell.

Good post.

 

[Noble Hawk]

I didn't LOL at "more accomplished". You inserted that word, not me. I LOL'd at "better", because that is the word the poster used.

RichRod did well at WVU in the weakest "Power" conference in the country. He had a .698 winning percentage in 7 seasons at WVU. Although, his predecessor produced a .612 winning percentage in the 21 seasons prior to RichRod becoming head coach, so its not like he came in and turned the WVU program around, per se.

Since then, in 9 season as a head coach, he's a .500 football coach (54-53), and he's won more than 8 games exactly once since his time at WVU. Including his time at WVU, he's coached in one more "BCS/NY6" bowl than Frost, and he's won the exact same number of as Frost - one.

Regarding his success at WVU:
RichRod had a .701 winning percentage in 7 season at WVU in the Big East.
RichRod's successors had a .712 winning percentage in 4 seasons at WVU in the Big East.
Since WVU left the Big East, WVU has a .558 winning percentage (43-34) in a tougher league that plays the same style of football that WVU does.

My point is that he is a lifetime .587 winning percentage coach with the same number of BCS/NY6 bowl wins as Frost, even though he was a head coach for 16 years and Frost has been a head coach for 2 years. Depending on your metric, he's more accomplished (total wins? So is Mike Riley. BCS/NYC6 wins? No). The stats don't really back up that he's a "better" coach than Frost. Time will tell.

Rich Rod was a better coach in 2007 than Frost is right now. How about that. “Stats” don’t back up anything about Scott Frost. He has been a coach for 2 years at a mid major.

 

[ThrowBones92]

Rich Rod was a better coach in 2007 than Frost is right now. How about that. “Stats” don’t back up anything about Scott Frost. He has been a coach for 2 years at a mid major.

.

So RichRod has regressed as a coach? We're cherry picking seasons? Scott Frost had a more successful season last year than any year RichRod has had in his career. Anyone can do that. Let's look at what he's done as a coach, period, if you're going to select him as the coach you want to use.

You know how strange it is to say, "2007 RichRod is better than 2018 Scott Frost" without using points to defend the statement? If you're going to do that, at least support your argument.

Based on your argument, in which RichRod was 7 seasons in at WVU, he had one BCS/NY6 bowl win, a .698 winning percentage, and one outright conference championship (1 four-way tie with an 8-4 record, 2 two-way ties with 8-5 and 10-2 records).

Scott Frost, two season in at UCF, one BCS/NY6 bowl win. and a .731 winning percentage, 1 outright conference championship, and 5 different groups named him 2018 National Coach of the Year (Bear Bryant, Eddie Robinson, AP, Home Depot, and AFCA National Coach of the Year). I believe that's a clean sweep of the prominent COY award, but I could be wrong.

Maybe I'm missing something that you can point out to me, but outside of total wins, I LOL at how flippantly and without any backup of your statement you can say, RichRod > Frost. I just think you want it to be true a lot more than it actually is.

I think the funniest part is how you say so confidently that "stats don't back up anything about Scott Frost." Yet you were the first person to talk about RR's "accomplishments"...which are scary similar to Scott Frosts.

One thing RR never earned was a National COY award. Frost was essentially the unanimous selection (5-award sweep). His winning percentage is better, he has the same # of outright conference champoinships, same # of BCS/NY6 bowl wins. All of these are important metrics. I'm not arguing that Frost is a better coach. The reason I LOL'd is that you're so sure that RichRod is clearly the better coach, when there isn't really anything you can point to that bears that out.

 

[Noble Hawk]

Lot of college football ignorance coming out of Iowa. Easy to get lost over here as a Nebraska fan, obsess much? Iowa easily has the worst fans in the country.

“Obsess much?” Says the Nebraska fan........on the Iowa board. Self awareness isn’t really your thing is it

 

[Noble Hawk]

.

So RichRod has regressed as a coach? We're cherry picking seasons? Scott Frost had a more successful season last year than any year RichRod has had in his career. Anyone can do that. Let's look at what he's done as a coach, period, if you're going to select him as the coach you want to use.

You know how strange it is to say, "2007 RichRod is better than 2018 Scott Frost" without using points to defend the statement? If you're going to do that, at least support your argument.

Based on your argument, in which RichRod was 7 seasons in at WVU, he had one BCS/NY6 bowl win, a .698 winning percentage, and one outright conference championship (1 four-way tie with an 8-4 record, 2 two-way ties with 8-5 and 10-2 records).

Scott Frost, two season in at UCF, one BCS/NY6 bowl win. and a .731 winning percentage, 1 outright conference championship, and 5 different groups named him 2018 National Coach of the Year (Bear Bryant, Eddie Robinson, AP, Home Depot, and AFCA National Coach of the Year). I believe that's a clean sweep of the prominent COY award, but I could be wrong.

Maybe I'm missing something that you can point out to me, but outside of total wins, I LOL at how flippantly and without any backup of your statement you can say, RichRod > Frost. I just think you want it to be true a lot more than it actually is.

I think the funniest part is how you say so confidently that "stats don't back up anything about Scott Frost." Yet you were the first person to talk about RR's "accomplishments"...which are scary similar to Scott Frosts.

One thing RR never earned was a National COY award. Frost was essentially the unanimous selection (5-award sweep). His winning percentage is better, he has the same # of outright conference champoinships, same # of BCS/NY6 bowl wins. All of these are important metrics. I'm not arguing that Frost is a better coach. The reason I LOL'd is that you're so sure that RichRod is clearly the better coach, when there isn't really anything you can point to that bears that out.

Good grief. You are proving my point.

 

[Obviously Oblivious]

BetDSI puts Nebraska's over/under at 5.5:

https://www.landof10.com/big-ten/big-ten-win-totals-2018-season-ohio-state-wisconsin-michigan

Early 2018 win total over/unders listed for Big Ten teams
(Odds as of 5/6)

• Ohio State 10.5
• Wisconsin 10
• Penn State 9.5
• Michigan 8.5
• Michigan State 8.5
• Northwestern 7.5
• Iowa 7.5
• Minnesota 6
• Nebraska 5.5
• Indiana 5.5
• Purdue 5
• Maryland 4.5
• Rutgers 4
• Illinois 3.5

Without looking at their schedules I'll go with:

• Ohio State 10.5 OVER
• Wisconsin 10 OVER
• Penn State 9.5 UNDER
• Michigan 8.5 UNDER
• Michigan State 8.5 OVER
• Northwestern 7.5 UNDER
• Iowa 7.5 OVER
• Minnesota 6 UNDER
• Nebraska 5.5 UNDER
• Indiana 5.5 UNDER
• Purdue 5 OVER
• Maryland 4.5 OVER
• Rutgers 4 OVER
• Illinois 3.5 UNDER

 

[ThrowBones92]

Good grief. You are proving my point.

You actually haven't made a single point that supports your position that RichRod was a "better" coach than Frost. He was at WVU longer than Frost was at UCF. That's about it.

Frost - 2 years at UFC
.731 winning percentage
1 BCS/NY6 bowl win
1 outright conference championship
1 sweep of National HCOY honors

RichRod - 7 years at WVU
.698 winning percentage
1 BCS/NY6 bowl win
1 outright conference championship
0 National HCOY honors

I'm proving your point for you that RichRod was clearly a better coach than Frost at the time when each took over their respective B1G programs? The only Frost is not, is he's not as tenured of a D1 coach, and that means very little here. Especially when you look at RR's further tenure - 54-53 in 9 seasons after leaving WVU. Completely average coach. Nothing points to Frost as an average coach, at this point.

You are the one who said RichRod is a better coach, the burden of proof is on you, and you aren't able to support that he's clearly the better coach.

LOL.

 

[Bill_Callahan2.0]

I think Neb goes 9-3 and Frost's seat get's a little warm.

 

[Blackleaf40]

mind blowing originality.

Look who's back everyone.

Lil bro troll.

I told you not to come back to this board Gregory.

 

[Obviously Oblivious]

mind blowing originality.

You just butthurt because I picked your boys under 5.5? Cry me a river brochacho.

 

[Obviously Oblivious]

You are persistant Rocky....How will you react if Frost turns out to be the best coach in the Big? It could happen. He has proven to be very good at each opportunity given to him.
Most recruits know who Frost is, and where he has been. His name is more known by recruits than KF. right now. Oregon's success coupled with coach of the year and an undefeated season at UCF in Florida opens lots of doors.

I almost choked on my dinner reading this! Surely you jest. Outside of Nebraska fans, before last season Frost was most well known for killing plants in the fall.

Better known than KF? Now I know you’re full of ish.

 

[Blackleaf40]

If you all didn't seem so insecure, I wouldn't use the word pussy. I may be wrong about Henrich though.

Next years game will be enjoyable, win or lose. I think the new coach will win though, despite him not running the "New England offense". Wonderful, hehe!

This is a toxic board. I enjoy the delusion though. I'll see you in the fall.

Delusional about what?

Beating Nebraska has become habitual.

 

[Johnsoda123]

Beating Mike Riley is habitual. The delusion is that you Iowa fanatics believe you're close to matching Wisconsin. If they had a better quarterback, this might be their best team ever.

The loss of Wadley and the outlaw will be heavier than you believe. Fant is an NFL tight end. The Marsette kid looks good. Wadley was the spark though.

It's all just words. I believe some moron Husker fans were hyping Mike, so I understand your incredulity.

Lots of NFL talent on this team besides Fant..Nelson, AJ, Hooker, Stanley, Wirfs, Hockenson...probably more.

 

[Blackleaf40]

Beating Mike Riley is habitual. The delusion is that you Iowa fanatics believe you're close to matching Wisconsin. If they had a better quarterback, this might be their best team ever.

The loss of Wadley and the outlaw will be heavier than you believe. Fant is an NFL tight end. The Marsette kid looks good. Wadley was the spark though.

It's all just words. I believe some moron Husker fans were hyping Mike, so I understand your incredulity.

Those "moron Husker fans" you referenced have been coming here since you joined the B1G. HERE!
If you sense it's toxic you have them to thank.

When you guys were beating us, it was by one or two touchdowns. Boy did they come here and smack talk about owning Iowa and soon the division! - - Never happened.
Next coach same thing -- never happened but we we're told it would. Rinse and repeat with Riley and NOW Frost.

So yeah...it gets old.

Any Iowa fans on YOUR boards doing that?

Come again?

 

[iahawkeyes17]

Look who's back everyone.

Lil bro troll.

I told you not to come back to this board Gregory.

Yeah the Domino pizza king of western Iowa/eastern Iowa is back with handle name reaching maybe 50 I think by now.

 

[Obviously Oblivious]

I didn't LOL at "more accomplished". You inserted that word, not me. I LOL'd at "better", because that is the word the poster used.

RichRod did well at WVU in the weakest "Power" conference in the country. He had a .698 winning percentage in 7 seasons at WVU. Although, his predecessor produced a .612 winning percentage in the 21 seasons prior to RichRod becoming head coach, so its not like he came in and turned the WVU program around, per se.

Since then, in 9 season as a head coach, he's a .500 football coach (54-53), and he's won more than 8 games exactly once since his time at WVU. Including his time at WVU, he's coached in one more "BCS/NY6" bowl than Frost, and he's won the exact same number of as Frost - one.

Regarding his success at WVU:
RichRod had a .701 winning percentage in 7 season at WVU in the Big East.
RichRod's successors had a .712 winning percentage in 4 seasons at WVU in the Big East.
Since WVU left the Big East, WVU has a .558 winning percentage (43-34) in a tougher league that plays the same style of football that WVU does.

My point is that he is a lifetime .587 winning percentage coach with the same number of BCS/NY6 bowl wins as Frost, even though he was a head coach for 16 years and Frost has been a head coach for 2 years. Depending on your metric, he's more accomplished (total wins? So is Mike Riley. BCS/NYC6 wins? No). The stats don't really back up that he's a "better" coach than Frost. Time will tell.

Frost lacks the resume to even make these comparisons. Only time will tell.

 

[ROCKY MOUNTAIN HAWK]

Yeah the Domino pizza king of western Iowa/eastern Iowa is back with handle name reaching maybe 50 I think by now.

Do you think he has any chance from getting out under his Domino’s life?? Poor broke bastard.

 

[Husker Hank]

Is it in 1995?

Nope, it is 2018.

You might want to screen shot this though. Probably not totally this year, but coming soon, Nebraska is going to be Nebraska once again, and when they are, Iowa, will still just be Iowa.

 

[iahawkeyes17]

Nope, it is 2018.

You might want to screen shot this though. Probably not totally this year, but coming soon, Nebraska is going to be Nebraska once again, and when they are, Iowa, will still just be Iowa.

When will that be? 2019, 2020, 2021? So are you saying you guys are going to win 10+ every year on a consistent basis like the old Big 8 days? Forgive us here if we are skeptical but your program hasn't had a season with fewer than 4 losses in 14 years and have heard this banter since you joined the Big 10 and well you haven't quite dominated like you expected to. Heck you don't even have a winning record vs lowly Iowa. Sorry times have changed. But please get back to us once you actually accomplish something on the field because honestly you are least the 100th Husker fan to post something like this the past couple of years.

 

[waterboy4582]

Nope, it is 2018.

You might want to screen shot this though. Probably not totally this year, but coming soon, Nebraska is going to be Nebraska once again, and when they are, Iowa, will still just be Iowa.

After Frost gets fired do you shut the program down or come to terms with the fact you are the same as Purdue.

 

[CDMXHusker]

When will that be? 2019, 2020, 2021? So are you saying you guys are going to win 10+ every year on a consistent basis like the old Big 8 days? Forgive us here if we are skeptical but your program hasn't had a season with fewer than 4 losses in 14 years and have heard this banter since you joined the Big 10 and well you haven't quite dominated like you expected to. Heck you don't even have a winning record vs lowly Iowa. Sorry times have changed. But please get back to us once you actually accomplish something on the field because honestly you are least the 100th Husker fan to post something like this the past couple of years.

I'm glad you Hawk fans are in denial, relying on recent history, not paying attention to what is really happening in Lincoln and completely under estimating the impact Frost will have at Nebraska. This is going to be fun to watch over the next few years. Yes. they will be returning to consistenly winning 10 games a year, not immediately there is a lot of work to be done 2019 might be a little soon but it is still a possiblility and if not then by 2020.

Iowa only has a winning record against them since Nebraska joined the B10, not all time, and that winning record is really only due to 3 straight wins against Mike Reily coaced teams. If ya want to hang your hat on that, more power to ya, we all know he is a terrible coach and the days of a soft, ill-prepared poorly coached Husker team are over. Gloat all you want over your recent succes against the Huskers (Iowa has earned that and clearly has had the better team the last three years), make all your wisecracks and assinine comments with your various cute little names for the Huskers because none of it matters and the Huskers wil be returing to a dominating team, You can bank on it.

 

[Blackleaf40]

I'm glad you Hawk fans are in denial, relying on recent history, not paying attention to what is really happening in Lincoln and completely under estimating the impact Frost will have at Nebraska. This is going to be fun to watch over the next few years. Yes. they will be returning to consistenly winning 10 games a year, not immediately there is a lot of work to be done 2019 might be a little soon but it is still a possiblility and if not then by 2020.

Iowa only has a winning record against them since Nebraska joined the B10, not all time, and that winning record is really only due to 3 straight wins against Mike Reily coaced teams. If ya want to hang your hat on that, more power to ya, we all know he is a terrible coach and the days of a soft, ill-prepared poorly coached Husker team are over. Gloat all you want over your recent succes against the Huskers (Iowa has earned that and clearly has had the better team the last three years), make all your wisecracks and assinine comments with your various cute little names for the Huskers because none of it matters and the Huskers wil be returing to a dominating team, You can bank on it.

Ok.

Well this is the first time any of us heard this.

 

[ROCKY MOUNTAIN HAWK]

I'm glad you Hawk fans are in denial, relying on recent history, not paying attention to what is really happening in Lincoln and completely under estimating the impact Frost will have at Nebraska. This is going to be fun to watch over the next few years. Yes. they will be returning to consistenly winning 10 games a year, not immediately there is a lot of work to be done 2019 might be a little soon but it is still a possiblility and if not then by 2020.

Iowa only has a winning record against them since Nebraska joined the B10, not all time, and that winning record is really only due to 3 straight wins against Mike Reily coaced teams. If ya want to hang your hat on that, more power to ya, we all know he is a terrible coach and the days of a soft, ill-prepared poorly coached Husker team are over. Gloat all you want over your recent succes against the Huskers (Iowa has earned that and clearly has had the better team the last three years), make all your wisecracks and assinine comments with your various cute little names for the Huskers because none of it matters and the Huskers wil be returing to a dominating team, You can bank on it.

I think the days of Neb being soft are just beginning. Scott Flop plays wussy fball, not tough fball.

 

[kentadel]

I think the days of Neb being soft are just beginning. Scott Flop plays wussy fball, not tough fball.

That's how he beat Auburn, that wussy team that beat both Alabama and Georgia. Wussy ball will work fine in the Big 10.

 

[luvmyhawks]

I'm glad you Hawk fans are in denial, relying on recent history, not paying attention to what is really happening in Lincoln and completely under estimating the impact Frost will have at Nebraska. This is going to be fun to watch over the next few years. Yes. they will be returning to consistenly winning 10 games a year, not immediately there is a lot of work to be done 2019 might be a little soon but it is still a possiblility and if not then by 2020.

Iowa only has a winning record against them since Nebraska joined the B10, not all time, and that winning record is really only due to 3 straight wins against Mike Reily coaced teams. If ya want to hang your hat on that, more power to ya, we all know he is a terrible coach and the days of a soft, ill-prepared poorly coached Husker team are over. Gloat all you want over your recent succes against the Huskers (Iowa has earned that and clearly has had the better team the last three years), make all your wisecracks and assinine comments with your various cute little names for the Huskers because none of it matters and the Huskers wil be returing to a dominating team, You can bank on it.

Holy shit, you guys are killing me in this thread. This is classic stuff.

 

[Obviously Oblivious]

Nope, it is 2018.

You might want to screen shot this though. Probably not totally this year, but coming soon, Nebraska is going to be Nebraska once again, and when they are, Iowa, will still just be Iowa.

Thanks Hank. I'm burying a time capsule today to be opened in 50 years (maybe it should be a 100?) so that my great, great, great grandchildren can marvel at your prognostications.

Or revel in their schadenfreude over Nebraska football's long slumbering mediocrity.