One, that's not going to happen. A mistrial. Two, what to say about you that you think that's a good thing? Worst criminal in our presidential history and you're hoping he goes free.Hahaha they didn't even get to half before they leaked the charges.
Hello mistrial.
Buttery mails.
No, I'm laughing at the continued ineptitude of the democratic party.One, that's not going to happen. A mistrial. Two, what to say about you that you think that's a good thing? Worst criminal in our presidential history and you're hoping he goes free.
You want to bet whether or not there will be a mistrial?No, I'm laughing at the continued ineptitude of the democratic party.
Do you think there is any disputing this will be a mistrial? As bad as the GA DA wishes they could have scrubbed that site its out there now.
There is no precedent for anything close to this and the only reason you chaps are turning a blind eye is he is the orange man.
Run it back, swing again.
U can just skip the middle and check out the leak.Grand Jury voting per @MSNBC and per GA law once an indictment is handed down it must be unsealed.
So, no bet Jack McCoy?Alright.
Let's watch it play out.
Him bet on that ?? He may be stupid, but he's not stupid.So, no bet Jack McCoy?
A week away from the board.What would you like to bet?
We'll see.Him bet on that ?? He may be stupid, but he's not stupid.
What would you like to bet?
Simple. You are saying there is going to be a grand jury mistrial. If it happens, I'll take a week's vacation. If it doesn't, you will.Decent.
Parameters?
And the timeliness for this? It isn't this that's going to get kicked out, it's the trial, because it was brought forth on bullshit ans they will have to rerun it.Simple. You are saying there is going to be a grand jury mistrial. If it happens, I'll take a week's vacation. If it doesn't, you will.
When and if the grand jury either indicts or doesn't. Should know in a day or two.And the timeliness for this?
No.When and if the grand jury either indicts or doesn't. Should know in a day or two.
Yeah.....The document in question, as claimed by the GA DA offices, was not theirs and was posted by an anonymous poster. And is fictitious. Let's see... QAnon, RNC, Elon Musk, Lying Donnie Sexual Abuser's own folks, so he can scam more$$... Take your pick.
So, you want this open-ended? You're saying some leak today will cause a mistrial. He should not be indicted if there was any impropriety in the proceedings.No.
That doesn't mean shit. The trial means something. They are going to indict him left and right, and the trials will be thrown out. (
Foe this one)
Thanks for that adept logic to support your stance...Yeah.....
Holy shit I'll spell it out.Trials thrown out?? Hahaha. Do you know how this process even works??
Trials thrown out?? Hahaha. Do you know how this process even works??
See below.So, you want this open-ended? You're saying some leak today will cause a mistrial. He should not be indicted if there was any impropriety in the proceedings.
You keep saying the trial will be declared a mistrial. Do you mean down the road, when an actual trial starts because he's indicted, that at that point that trial will be declared a mistrial because of something that happened in the grand jury? Is that really what you're trying to say?Whiskey, you seem to be calling this process a trial. You do realize that this is a grand jury sitting. And not a trial? You do understand that right?
Yes. And the decision today will be with what to charge him. Then it will go.to trial. Trump will argue the trial is a mistrial and he will have a leg to stand on.Whiskey, you seem to be calling this process a trial. You do realize that this is a grand jury sitting. And not a trial? You do understand that right?
Just remember through all this, the Democrats and Biden are worse. There is absolutely ZERO evidence that this is the case but we're just supposed to go with it.Lovely thought, but we all know that Lying Donnie Sexual Abuser will not be held. Too bad.
Then the arraignment then. If what you say is accurate, then then case should be dismissed at the arraignment, right? It shouldn't go beyond that.See below.
That's right but he can't grasp that.Then the arraignment then. If what you say is accurate, then then case should be dismissed at the arraignment, right? It shouldn't go beyond that.
They are going to indict him left and right, and the trials will be thrown out. (
Foe this one)