so the timeline goes:
And they offer their "thought$ and prayer$" to their fal$e god$ and expect to be reconciled.Moar guns...the Republicans answer to everything and they never accept responsibility for anything.
Republicans =Trash
The way Vance is performing he may need to worry more about the folks on his side of the bullet proof glass
Coincidence the kid’s name is “Colt”?so the timeline goes:
- Kid makes school shooting threats online
- FBI investigates
- Months later dad buys kid gun
- Months later kid shoots up school
Amazing. 10/10. No notes.
Good start, but not far enough. I continue to believe that if you give a gun to someone who commits a crime you should face the identical charges as if you were the person committing the crime. First degree murder for the dad. F*ck him, let him spend his life in jail or face the death penalty depending on the state.
The way Vance is performing he may need to worry more about the folks on his side of the bullet proof glass
Amazing how it was quickly community noted about what he actually said
Amazing how it was quickly community noted about what he actually said
Not sure how true it is but there are facebook posts by his mother circulating saying it's bullshit they're trying him as an adult and the system is being unfair to her son.Coincidence the kid’s name is “Colt”?
Chances this dude picked up his mess?
Not sure how true it is but there are facebook posts by his mother circulating saying it's bullshit they're trying him as an adult and the system is being unfair to her son.
And will be serving a long prison sentence for that “gift.”
When your kid murders 4 ppl you don’t get to defend them anymore. No reasonable or sensible parent would. Doesn’t mean you can’t love them but actions have consequences and in happen they lock up…he’ll fry the dad for all I careI mean, she is the mom, it's her job to defend HER child. But, treat your kid like an adult (give them a gun) they will be treated like an adult by the rest of us when he commits an adult crime.
Good thing the kid was "adult" enough for a weapon.Not sure how true it is but there are facebook posts by his mother circulating saying it's bullshit they're trying him as an adult and the system is being unfair to her son.
It wouldn’t take much to take it apart and reassemble in a bathroom stall.I don’t know if this has been talked about in other threads, but how does a 14 year-old get an AR gun to school? Does it fit in a backpack? Under a coat he was wearing? And no one saw him put the gun in his locker?
Sounds like the father should be charged as an accomplice and the fbi continues to be run by morons
The caption is misleading.
Double standards exist in society, but this is quite possibly the dumbest shit written about school shootings to date. Congratulations.I am okay with the parents being held responsible as long as it isn’t just white parents. Which it is.
Yup. In other words, you can disregard everything he said up until "as long as".Double standards exist in society, but this is quite possible the dumbest shit written about school shootings to date. Congratulations.
there is a slippery slope to all this.Double standards exist in society, but this is quite possible the dumbest shit written about school shootings to date. Congratulations.
Charging parents for school shootings is a very recent precedent. When a black, Latino, or Asian kid does a school shooting and no charges are filed against the parents, then maybe he’ll have a point.Yup. In other words, you can disregard everything he said up until "as long as".
The family has not done itself any favors.Not sure how true it is but there are facebook posts by his mother circulating saying it's bullshit they're trying him as an adult and the system is being unfair to her son.
I don’t know.When it’s publicly stated the gun was a gift that seems like a slam dunk but where do you draw the line?
A big part of these cases will hinge on whether the parent has reason to believe that the child could become a school shooter. If the reporting is accurate in this case then there seemed to be evidence that this kid was dangerous and a reasonable parent would take steps to insure their child did not have access to a firearm.there is a slippery slope to all this.
If the gun was the dad’s and the kid took it…..
If it was the dad’s gun but the dad left the home months ago…..
If the kid got the gun illegally but kept it in the house?…. Need to prove the parents knew about the gun?…
When it’s publicly stated the gun was a gift that seems like a slam dunk but where do you draw the line?