Fran is choosing the "threat" of scoring in Jordan over the intangibles of Joe.
Joe is faster, a better defender, and can create his own shot off the dribble/handle the ball better.
Jordan doesn't turn it over unless he decides to make a lazy pass here or there in transition (or the occasional zig when someone should've zagged).
He is also not afraid to shoot 3s and is a true threat from the FT line. Something, Joe is still improving on.
Teams have to account for Jordan at all times and usually sic one of their best defenders on him to hound him everywhere he goes. Even when he's not scoring (as frustrating as that probably is for him in what will probably be his final season), teams must lock onto him.
They back off of Joe and dare him to shoot 3s, and Joe will still pass them up.
That's really the difference right now. I think if they were willing to allow their offense to open up the lane a bit more to let Joe drive and attack the basket/free up the drive and kick, then there would be a much bigger role for Joe and I think that would benefit Iowa in the long run.
The issue is whether they can gameplan to make that in-game adjustment....or if they're gonna stay set in their ways.
I personally think getting your usual scoring....AND offense from Joe with designed looks for him to drive and do what he does best........MAKES Iowa the best (or at least a better) version of themselves.
Just sayin.
No, this is an intelligent critique. And I agree with most of it.