ADVERTISEMENT

GOP sets vote for bill that would give greater parental control over public school curriculums

cigaretteman

HB King
May 29, 2001
78,091
59,862
113
Depolrable. Of all of the problems that our country is facing, this is what the GOP advances. Another Republican solution in search for a problem:

House Republicans will press forward Friday with a midterm campaign promise by voting on legislation to give parents greater say in what is taught in public schools, even as critics decry the “parents’ rights” bill as a burdensome proposal that would fuel a far-right movement that has resulted in book bans, rewrites of history curricula and raucous school board meetings across the country.

Republican House Speaker Kevin McCarthy has made the bill — labeled the Parents’ Bill of Rights Act — a top priority during the early weeks of his tenure atop the House. It will be an early test of unity for the chamber’s 222 Republicans, who have a thin majority.



Even as House Republicans returned this week from a retreat where they insisted they are unified, lawmakers have proposed a score of potential changes to the bill, adding a degree of uncertainty to Friday’s vote.

It showed how the adoption of an open amendment process in the House — a concession McCarthy made to win hardline conservatives’ support for his speakership — holds the potential to send legislation down unpredictable twists and turns. House Freedom Caucus members attempted to add amendments to the bill that amounted to a far-reaching dream list: a call to abolish the Department of Education, a requirement that schools report transgender athletes who participate in women’s sports and an endorsement of vouchers that would send public funds to private schools.


“Some of this stuff will sink the bill,” said Republican Rep. Don Bacon of Nebraska on Thursday evening, adding, “You’re taking a bill that is generally unifying and you’re making it more partisan than it needed to be and that’s what I worry about.”

Even if the House passes the legislation, it has little chance in the Democratic-held Senate, where it would need 60 votes to pass. Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer promised it faced a “dead end” in his chamber and skewered it as evidence that the House GOP has been overtaken by “hard right MAGA ideologues” — referencing former President Donald Trump’s “Make America Great Again” slogan.

In the wake of the pandemic and racial justice protests, conservatives’ intense focus on parental control over public school classrooms has migrated from local school board fights to Republican-held statehouses and now to the floor of the U.S. House.

“Parents want schools focused on reading, writing and math, not woke politics,” Rep. Mary Miller, an Illinois Republican, said during House debate Thursday.

Public school education in the U.S. has long invited concern among some parents — usually conservative — over what children are taught. Historically, the term “parents’ rights” has been used in schoolhouse debates over homeschooling, sex education and even the teaching of languages other than English.

Recently, Republicans have tapped into frustrations over remote learning and mask mandates in schools, as well as social conservatives’ opposition to certain teachings on race that are broadly labeled as “critical race theory.” Virginia Gov. Glenn Youngkin, a Republican, won election in 2021 on the slogan “Parents matter,” and other political action committees poured millions of dollars into school board races nationwide.

McCarthy made the “parents’ bill of rights” a plank in his midterm election pitch to voters to give Republicans a House majority. But the GOP’s expectation of a sweeping victory never materialized, and even in school board races, conservative groups’ goal of electing hundreds of “parents’ rights” activists largely fell short.

But McCarthy pressed ahead with the bill as a priority, making a public appeal earlier this month at an event that featured a chalkboard, schoolchildren and parents who have been on the frontlines of the cause.

McCarthy chose the bill’s number, H.R. 5, because children enter kindergarten at age five, and the legislation is built on five pillars: parents’ right to examine curricula and school library books, meet with educators at least twice each school year, review school budgets and spending, be notified of violent events in their child’s school and have elementary and middle schools to get their consent to change a child’s gender designation, pronouns or name.

“It’s about every parent, mom and dad, but most importantly about the students in America,” McCarthy said at the introduction event.

Democrats like Oregon’s Rep. Suzanne Bonamici labeled the bill as the “Politics over Parents Act,” arguing it would seed enmity between parents and educators and empower conservative activists who want to weed out books that delve into teachings on race and sexuality. Bonamici offered alternative legislation that she argued would foster parental involvement, encourage collaboration with educators and make schools welcoming places to families, including those with LGBTQ students.

“We want parents to be involved — peacefully,” Bonamici said.

Democrats also raised alarm that the bill as written would force schools to out LGBTQ students to their families, which can sometimes lead to abuse or abandonment.

“We’ll fight against this legislation. We’ll fight against the banning of books, fight against the bullying of children from any community, and certainly from the LGBTQ+ community,” House Democratic leader Hakeem Jeffries said.

Attempted book bans and restrictions at school and public libraries surged to their highest number in 2022 since the American Library Association began keeping data 20 years ago, according to a new report the organization released this week.

The bill’s supporters described it as common-sense legislation to foster opportunities for schoolchildren by encouraging parents to have greater input into what their children learn in school. They also insisted it does not ban any books, even though conservative activists have used similar legislation from state legislatures to press school boards to remove books that teach about the country’s racist history or LGBTQ sexuality.

Republican Rep. Virginia Foxx said, “Our bill is meant to give parents their God-given rights to be involved with their children’s education.”

 
A full year spent bitching about inflation and the border yet this and Hunter are what the GOP decides to spend their time on.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cigaretteman
R's finally learned the bill naming game.


Get the D's to vote against the "Parental Bill of Rights Act".

They know this gets sunk in the senate....political move.
Is this the type of legislation you want your republican Congresspeople to be working on?
 
R's finally learned the bill naming game.


Get the D's to vote against the "Parental Bill of Rights Act".

They know this gets sunk in the senate....political move.
Unfortunately, that's all the GOP has to show for themselves for decades it seems. Practical, efficient and needed legislation must be a victim to GOP grandstanding because, that's all they have. No substance. This bill won't likely make it out of the House if those radical amendments are attached. Not all Rs are MAGA.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: Roodolf and DFSNOLE
I keep hearing about the death of the gop and how democrats outnumber Republicans. If that is the case this type of thing shouldn't be a problem at all. You will be able to teach ALL the gender CRT you want!
 
I keep hearing about the death of the gop and how democrats outnumber Republicans. If that is the case this type of thing shouldn't be a problem at all. You will be able to teach ALL the gender CRT you want!
Not in MAGA States like Mississippi North.
The problem in Merica is minority rule.
No way a State like Wyoming, population 650,000 has 2 US Senators and NY State, population 21,000,000, has 2 US Senators is equitable.
Flyover States have too much power.
 
Last edited:
McCarthy chose the bill’s number, H.R. 5, because children enter kindergarten at age five, and the legislation is built on five pillars: parents’ right to examine curricula and school library books, meet with educators at least twice each school year, review school budgets and spending, be notified of violent events in their child’s school and have elementary and middle schools to get their consent to change a child’s gender designation, pronouns or name.
Five pillars...ok, let's go through these:

1) Parents right to examine curricula and school library books.
Anyone can already do this. State standards are not hard to find and if you are concerned about what is in the library, go check it out for yourself. Most schools don't even have a full time librarian anymore.

2) Meet with educators at least twice each school year.
Again, this already exists. They are called parent teacher conferences. You know, the thing nobody ever shows up for. Even with those, you can meet with a teacher at any time, all you have to do is ask.

3) Review school budgets and spending.
Try going to a school board meeting. Any school board doing their job will want a budget review from the Superintendent at least once a year. If they aren't doing this, then that's on the local community. While I'm sure there is probably a district somewhere that doesn't do this, they are few and far between. The budget is often the main reason school board members want to be on the school board.

4) Notified of violent events in school.
I assume they are talking about school shootings? Yeah, you're going to be notified about these things. I'm betting you are going to get really tired of hearing about every fight that happens in school if that's what you want to hear about. This also opens up all sorts of privacy issues.

5) Requiring consent to change a child's designation, pronouns, and name.
At least in Illinois, which is among the most progressive states in this area, you already are required to get consent for these things. We can't legally change those things without that consent from parents. I find it hard to believe that this is not the case in other states, particularly the red states where this issue seems to be the focus of all attention.

So, he's spent over a year to write a bill that does not change anything at all. Nothing in this bill changes existing law with the possible exception of expanding what "violent events" parents are notified about. Nice job, Kevin. Wasting taxpayer dollars like a veteran Republican.
 
I don't think Americans really pay attention to that stuff. That's a fixation of centrists
Sure...but one of the things the R's ran on in 2022 was "parental rights" in education. They obviously think it's a winner...

Fulfill the campaign promise by passing it even though they know it dies in the senate. Use it in 2024.

SOP.
 
Unfortunately, that's all the GOP has to show for themselves for decades it seems. Practical, efficient and needed legislation must be a victim to GOP grandstanding because, that's all they have. No substance. This bill won't likely make it out of the House if those radical amendments are attached. Not all Rs are MAGA.
D House passed plenty stuff they knew was going nowhere in 2018-2020. R Senate shot it down. It's SOP....used it as a reason to give them control in 2020.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: RileyHawk
D House passed plenty stuff they knew was going nowhere in 2018-2020. R Senate shot it down. It's SOP....used it as a reason to give them control in 2020.
You are correct, that this is a standard practice, but it would be nice if they would at least pass bills on things they campaigned on. Like immigration reform. That's actually an achievable goal as Democrats want that too. Maybe that's why they don't do it. They are afraid they might actually accomplish something.
 
D House passed plenty stuff they knew was going nowhere in 2018-2020. R Senate shot it down. It's SOP....used it as a reason to give them control in 2020.
Which is why I’ve said many times that a bill passed in one chamber has be given a floor vote in the other. The speaker/majority leader shouldn’t get to kill legislation they don’t like.
 
You are correct, that this is a standard practice, but it would be nice if they would at least pass bills on things they campaigned on. Like immigration reform. That's actually an achievable goal as Democrats want that too. Maybe that's why they don't do it. They are afraid they might actually accomplish something.
They campaigned on parental rights in education.


I'll bet that the House passes a immigration reform bill.....but it'll be packed with border security stuff.
 
Not in MAGA States like Mississippi North.
The problem in Merica is minority rule.
No way a State like Wyoming, population 650,000 has 2 US Senators and NY State, population 21,000,000, has 2 US Senators is equitable.
Flyover States have too much power.
**** off a lot on the flyover state comment
 
They campaigned on parental rights in education.

That still doesn't change the fact that the things they campaigned on already exist. It just highlights how stupid people are that think this is some meaningful campaign policy. Nothing in this law changes existing law in any consequential way.
 
Which is why I’ve said many times that a bill passed in one chamber has be given a floor vote in the other. The speaker/majority leader shouldn’t get to kill legislation they don’t like.
I agree with this.

They can vote on multiple bills a day...it's not a time issue.
 
Maybe not but MCConnell was afraid of GOP defectors voting with the Dems. Best way to hide them is to not bring over 400 bills up for a vote.
You think Schumer is gonna bring all the R house bills for a vote?

I agree with biohawk...they should all be brought up for a vote.
 
That still doesn't change the fact that the things they campaigned on already exist. It just highlights how stupid people are that think this is some meaningful campaign policy. Nothing in this law changes existing law in any consequential way.
Then why is it being called "Fascism" by AOC?
 
You think Schumer is gonna bring all the R house bills for a vote?

I agree with biohawk...they should all be brought up for a vote.
I think someone else said that, but I do agree with the "All bills from the other chamber need to be brought up for a vote" policy. Either with changes or as is.

Maybe designate that bills from the other chamber get a certain amount of time for changes to be applied and then the minority party can force a vote on them. This allows for extensions on bills where more time is needed to negotiate a deal that has a real chance of passing while also giving the minority party power to force the issue if the majority is simply stalling and avoiding it.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT