Rino! Or Marxist! Or something….Wouldn't the gulf of North America make more sense since both countries that border in reside in North America?
I don't think taking back the canal would do anything about the 2 ports China controls.I think he is referencing the 2 out of 5 mentioned and there may be more at play as far as who is actually in charge of what.
Thank you for atleast taking the 30 seconds to listen and actually hear what the guy said.
He didn't say anything about talking them back, he said he may look at economic sanctions to get panama back in control of them.I don't think taking back the canal would do anything about the 2 ports China controls.
I don't think taking back the canal would do anything about the 2 ports China controls.
He wants the US to take back the canal. He wouldn't rule out the use of military force to do so.He didn't say anything about talking them back, he said he may look at economic sanctions to get panama back in control of them.
The gift was to Panama, for Panama ( read US) , not for China.
stable too!The dude has no idea wtf he is talking about. But in his mind he is a super genious
He specifically mentioned economic at no point did Donald Trump discuss the military, that was part of the question.He wants the US to take back the canal. He wouldn't rule out the use of military force to do so.
Did you listen to it? Did you hear him specifically diacuss economic sanctions?The dude has no idea wtf he is talking about. But in his mind he is a super genious
I don't think you listened to the clip.He specifically mentioned economic at no point did Donald Trump discuss the military, that was part of the question.
If you need to find something to hyperventilate about, iowa fans have been waiting 3 days for a QB we were all told was going to commit Sunday. Jump in one of those threads.
I did, and just like that article says his response was "I'm not going to commit to that, you might have to do something"I don't think you listened to the clip.
Trump refuses to rule out use of military force to take control of Greenland and the Panama Canal
President-elect Donald Trump says he won't rule out the use of military force to seize control of the Panama Canal and Greenland as he declared U.S. control of both to be vital to American national security.apnews.com
Trump won’t commit to not using military to get Panama Canal
President-elect Donald Trump on Tuesday refused to commit to not using the U.S. military to gain control of the Panama Canal, after vowing last month to take over the operation of the key passagewa…fox56news.com
I swear, you and H4aD are opposite sides of the same coin.
I never said coddle them. I said understand them.
I never said it was Dems fault. I said develop a better strategy.
Your strategy? DO NOTHING because there's "no reaching them". Well, then, you get what you get, Chis. Put on your big boy pants and quit bitching all the time.
It's embarrassing at this point. Dumbest cult on Earth.I don't think you listened to the clip.
Trump refuses to rule out use of military force to take control of Greenland and the Panama Canal
President-elect Donald Trump says he won't rule out the use of military force to seize control of the Panama Canal and Greenland as he declared U.S. control of both to be vital to American national security.apnews.com
Trump won’t commit to not using military to get Panama Canal
President-elect Donald Trump on Tuesday refused to commit to not using the U.S. military to gain control of the Panama Canal, after vowing last month to take over the operation of the key passagewa…fox56news.com
I don't give 2 shits either what you or a MAGA apologist thinks. Thanks.I don't think Chis is as influential to the process as many here to think.
I don't give 2 shits either what you or a MAGA apologist thinks. Thanks.
What he wouldn't commit to was not using military action because he thinks he may have to do something militarily.I did, and just like that article says his response was "I'm not going to commit to that, you might have to do something"
I don't think Chis is as influential to the process as many here to think.
Great tune right there
What he wouldn't commit to was not using military action because he thinks he may have to do something milmilitarily
Sorry if I came off as attacking on you. I wasn't at all. The naiveness and ho humming of some and BothSidesBins this BS is quite frankly pitiful.Well that's cool.
I was just pointing out that every Trumper or moderate that blames speech like yours for why we have Trump is putting too much responsibility on you and not enough on themselves.
Great tune right there
Not panicking I don't think even the MAGA congress would support a military action against Panama or Greenland, but even you can't deny that's what Trump proposed today.And Jimmy might eat that bag of shit with his steak.... at some point you guys are going to have to quit trying to find ways to panic.
You're right. We should all wake up every morning and chose between these two emotions:Sorry if I came off as attacking on you. I wasn't at all. The naiveness and ho humming of some and BothSidesBins this BS is quite frankly pitiful.
That is NOT what he "proposed" and frankly it's the opposite. "Im not going to eliminate that" is the opposite of proposing it, and again, the only reason the military was brought up was the question, his response was towards the economics of it.Not panicking I don't think even the MAGA congress would support a military action against Panama or Greenland, but even you can't deny that's what Trump proposed today.
"The party is always right"You're right. We should all wake up every morning and chose between these two emotions:
Or
Let's face it, Chis, you don't want to engage in a rational conversation about what your party can/should do differently. All you hear is, "It's the Dems fault." If you're not in complete, emotional breakdown, you're clearly not happy.
He proposed a possibility of using the military. That's the opposite of saying he'd only use economic pressure.That is NOT what he "proposed" and frankly it's the opposite. "Im not going to eliminate that" is the opposite of proposing it, and again, the only reason the military was brought up was the question, his response was towards the economics of it.
You sound mad. You mad bro?Did you listen to it? Did you hear him specifically diacuss economic sanctions?
Wddt...Jimmy how do I know you are not going eat a whole bag of shit, a ribeye, and a mashed potato for dinner tonight?
Jimmy---"I'm going to have a steak and potato...."
Derrrrr he didn't say he wasn't going to eat a bag of shit!!!!
You are better than that.
No he did not. At no point did he propose that, he said he wouldn't eliminate it, do you know what the word proposed means?He proposed a possibility of using the military. That's the opposite of saying he'd only use economic pressure.
Don't know where you got that, We just got the QB, I'm ****ing loving life right now.You sound mad. You mad bro?
Why didn't he just say no to the question then?No he did not. At no point did he propose that, he said he wouldn't eliminate it, do you know what the word proposed means?
The question proposed the use of the military.
Trump said they .right need to do something.
He's always mad about something.You sound mad. You mad bro?
I'm not going to defend Donald Trump's speech pattern, I wish he handled much of it differently but we are also sitting with hindsight and time to review. Listen to what he said in the interviewWhy didn't he just say no to the question then?
Is that what your feelings tell you?He's always mad about something.
Because he means military action is not off the table. Why is that so hard for you to understand?I'm not going to defend Donald Trump's speech pattern, I wish he handled much of it differently but we are also sitting with hindsight and time to review. Listen to what he said in the interview
"Will you eliminate the possibility... "
"No, i won't do that."
And you chicken Littles are acting like we are about to bomb panama.
And Jimmy might eat that bag of shit.Because he means military action is not off the table. Why is that so hard for you to understand?
You're right. We should all wake up every morning and chose between these two emotions:
Or
Let's face it, Chis, you don't want to engage in a rational conversation about what your party can/should do differently. All you hear is, "It's the Dems fault." If you're not in complete, emotional breakdown, you're clearly not happy.
Like I said, I'm not panicking. I was listening and comprehending what he said.And Jimmy might eat that bag of shit.
You gotta learn to relax, try to listen to the guy, it isn't easy, no doubt, but panic porn is going to make your life hard for 4 years.
It isnt easy, his speech pattern is annoying, but, in trumps head, he is about to go into a negotiation, he wants all his cards viable, even though we all know we are not going to do anything militarily.Like I said, I'm not panicking. I was listening and comprehending what he said.