Read what the federal judge said AFTER the conclusion of the Warren Report, excuse me, Mueller Report.
Hillary is saying Tulsi is being groomed by the Russians
- Thread starter BrunoMars420
- Start date
Ha. That’s rich coming from a Trumpanista. How is a ‘if’ statement crazy to you? If Tulsi runs as a third party candidate, it will be telling. It’s pretty simple.
Hey, it’s your company line. No surprise. You must be proud.
Your company line is, "Psst! There's a commie under your bed." Good night, McCarthy!
Hillary Clinton is a Russian asset. She's going to undermine and ruin the Democratic ticket in 2020 as well.
With her accomplice, Commie John Brennan. People forget how many people in the Intel community owe their careers to the royal family, The Clintons, 8 years of Bill and 8 years of Obombya. That's one big swamp. Of course, we see how tight they are with the Bush family too.
You are ****ing nuts. Thanks for clarifying. Strummingram as well. You guys are trying a bit to hard for Tulsi and what’s beautiful about what Clinton did by calling her out is that she preemptively closed the option for Tulsi to run as a third party candidate.
You are too dumb to bring anything of substance to a thread. Just character assassination. Keep cheering for more war, Neocon. Saudi Arabia thanks you.
What part of "the Mueller Report exonerated Trump" is confusing for you here?
Running out of things to stay on topic again, huh? Lather, rinse, repeat. blah blah effing blah.
What’s funny is you actually believe you bring something to the table. You are a Trumpanista and a Russiafile. You believe everyone who doesn’t agree with your insane ideas is a warmonger. You want a dialogue, quit with the crazy.
Did anyone mention "conviction"?
There are upwards of 10 counts of OOJ.
Barr and the DOJ "Casual Friday Jeans Day" policy is preventing indictments.
You guys think there’s a Russian behind every curtain. Hence the ‘nuts’
Kind of a change from what Obama told Romney huh?
Last edited:
Truth Is A Kremlin Talking Point
In response to a statement during the Democratic primary debates by presidential candidate Andrew Yang that both Russia and the United States have engaged in election interference, liberal pundit Molly McKew tweeted, “I now retract any vaguely nice thing I ever said about Yang knowing technology things because he answered the question on Putin with moral equivalency and a Kremlin talking point.”
If you’re in the mood for some depressing amusement, just type the words “Kremlin talking point” without quotation marks into Twitter’s search engine and scroll through all the results which come up. Just keep on scrolling and observe how this label, “Kremlin talking point”, gets bleated by mainstream empire loyalists to dismiss subjects ranging from the rigging of Democratic primaries to criticism of US regime change wars to endless US warmongering to concerns about new cold war escalations to disliking John McCain to criticism of Nancy Pelosi. Any criticism of the status quo which cannot be labeled false or misleading gets labeled a “talking point” of Russia/Putin/the Kremlin by those who support and defend the status quo of US-centralized imperialist world hegemony.
Yang’s statement about US intervention in foreign elections is indisputably true, of course. Both alternative and mainstream media outlets have thoroughly documented the fact that the US government’s own data shows them to have interfered in scores of foreign elections, far more than any other nation on earth. This includes an interference in Russia’s elections in the nineties that was so brazen they made a Hollywood movie about it. Former CIA Director James Woolsey openly admitted on Fox News last year that the US still interferes in foreign elections to this very day.
These are not conspiracy theories. These are not even secrets. These are facts. But because they are inconvenient facts, they get labeled “Kremlin talking points” by those whose job it is to defend the status quo.
Hawaii Congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard was also branded with the accusation of voicing “Kremlin talking points” for remarks she made during last night’s debate. In her case those “talking points” consisted of the indisputable fact that the bloodshed in Syria can be blamed on US politicians from both parties, and the indisputable fact that the US has armed extremist militias in that nation with the goal of effecting regime change.
“Literally a Kremlin talking point, but whatever,” tweeted #Resistance pundit Leah McElrath in response to Gabbard’s debate comments.
“It is a fact that the Russian talking point for years has been that the United States arms al-Qaeda in Syria. Tulsi Gabbard just said it on national television,” tweeted journalist Scott Stedman.
“How odd to listen to Tulsi Gabbard mouthing Syrian and Russian talking points on the Democratic debate stage…sorry but no one thinks US troops withdrawn by Trump were there as part of a ‘regime change war’ by the US,” tweeted Susan Glasser of CNN and The New Yorker.
So the establishment narrative managers now have an official three-word debunk of any criticism of the establishment which employs them, which applies even when that criticism is fully based in facts and reality. Facts are a Kremlin talking point, and anyone who believes them is Russian. Facts are Russian. Truth is Russian. Skepticism is Russian. Asking questions is Russian. Dissent is Russian. Revolution is Russian.
So let’s all get Russian then, baby. Let’s all fill our heads with objectively true Kremlin talking points and Cossack dance our way to a fact-based relationship with reality. Get as Russian as possible. Get aggressively Russian. Get offensively Russian. Get so Russian it hurts. Get so Russian it curls Louise Mensch’s hair. If they are going to start telling us that truth is Russian, then the only appropriate thing to say in response is dasvidaniya.
https://caitlinjohnstone.com/2019/10/17/truth-is-a-kremlin-talking-point/
I guess I'm not understanding the term "Russian Talking Points." As I said, threads/topics like these help to identify the party die-hards from objective minds.
And nothing to do with collusion or hacking from the demented and senile, Mueller.
What did the federal judge determine after the closing of the Mueller Report?
NBC asked the Clinton camp if she was talking about Gabbard and whoever responded said something like if the shoe fits, where it. Not those exact words but I’ll find them for you.
So no, Hillary didn’t, but her people did.
That is a really stupid argument. Are you suggesting foreign policy is stagnant? Positions never change?
Nick Merrill said “if the nesting doll fits” when asked by NBC if Clinton was talking about Gabbard
Here you go..... Keep on With your conspiracy
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/ncna1068786
No. What I think is, is that this Russia thing is a convenient method of distracting from the actual abject embarrassment of the leading leftist candidates. Both those running and those that wish they had.
While she did not mention Tulsi Gabbard by name, the Hawaiian congresswoman has been accused of disloyalty to America since day one of her presidential campaign, for the “crime” of criticizing the US sponsorship of anti-government rebels in Syria and calling for increased dialog with Moscow.
When asked whether Clinton was talking about Gabbard, a Clinton spokesperson later told CNN “if the nesting doll fits,”doubling down on the Russian imagery.
As for how exactly “the Russians” are grooming Gabbard, Clinton pointed to “a bunch of sites and bots and other ways of supporting her so far,” seemingly oblivious to the fact that the ‘Russian bots sowing discord’ theory is a thoroughly debunked smear.
Not content to stop at Gabbard, Clinton also accused the Green Party’s Jill Stein of being in the Kremlin’s employ. “Yeah, she’s a Russian asset,” Clinton added. “I mean, totally.” The fact that a small number of voters Clinton believed herself entitled to opted for Stein in 2016 was proof enough for her.
Tulsi is irrelevant. Why do you think all Trump supporters love this socialist? This whole ordeal has been invented to try to cause discord within democratic ranks. It’s ridiculous.
The non-interventionist aspect? This is the part warmongers like yourself detest. Just come clean already. You love war which destroys our economy and Bill of Rights.
She’s not the only non-interventionist, so why the socialist Tulsi for Trump supporters?
Earlier you stated all Trump supporters like Tulsi. Do you have a poll or some other evidence to back that up?
Here we go again. Clinton is the boogey man. JFC.
Similar threads
