Hillary is saying Tulsi is being groomed by the Russians
- Thread starter BrunoMars420
- Start date
She's attractive. All Trump supporters see women purely in the context of whether they'd like to grab them by their private parts.
Putin, like every other foreign leader, ally or foe, has preferences as to who becomes president. He didn't suddenly decide to make a choice in 2016. But a lot of Trumpophobes can't process that fact.
Probably because they figure "What the hell! They already believe it. Давайте трахаться с ними!"
For something that seems to be a large part of her campaign.....
https://www.staradvertiser.com/2019...-out-tulsi-gabbard-for-missing-vote-on-syria/
https://www.staradvertiser.com/2019...-out-tulsi-gabbard-for-missing-vote-on-syria/
Yea because it was such a close vote. You think she didn’t know the tally.
But hell, guess she’s guilty as charged
She should sue her and get some of that Russian money her and Bill have pulled in over the years
I think it's hilarious. Tulsi Gabbard is a progressive through-and-through. And, she's being shunned by progressives because they prefer the ones that tow the D line... the ones that will sell them down the river. Good! They deserve everything they get... which is nothing. Gabbard's record shows that she puts the American PEOPLE first. Clearly an ideal candidate for the "Russians" to pick to scuttle the election and get what they want.
I’m saying that if it was such a big part of her campaign she should have made the vote. Nothing on her calendar.
They probably don't give a shit about that. And, Americans do that without any help from anyone.
I don't like how Tulsi keeps putting forth this narrative that all these behind the strings entities are out to get her and rig the primary. Her complaints about the DNC rigging the debates are complete horseshit. Her complaints about google seem pretty far fetched as well. Seems more like her team doesn't have their shit together and would rather blame everybody else and play the victim. Now she is claiming Clinton is pulling all these strings to destroy her. Her complaints seem like the same type you see from right wing dumbasses like Don Jr claiming twitter is shadowbanning him.
Also, what the **** does she mean the primary is between her and Clinton? So the primary is now a two person race with one person polling in the single digits and the other isn't running. Da fuq.
I don't think Russia is "grooming" her. But if it came out russian bots/trolls were promoting her it wouldn't surprise me. Doesn't she mean she's colluding with russia or anything.
Also, what the **** does she mean the primary is between her and Clinton? So the primary is now a two person race with one person polling in the single digits and the other isn't running. Da fuq.
I don't think Russia is "grooming" her. But if it came out russian bots/trolls were promoting her it wouldn't surprise me. Doesn't she mean she's colluding with russia or anything.
Jill Stein 1.07%
G. Johnson 3.28%
Then you have Evan McMullin who grabbed another 700,000+ votes. So, anti-Trump conservatives accounted for 5 million votes. Were they Russian assets as well?
Without Gary Johnson/McMullin, the popular vote would have been very close.
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/...ian-asset-groomed-to-ensure-trump-re-election
Hillary Clinton says Tulsi Gabbard is a 'Russian asset' groomed to ensure Trump reelection
by Tim Pearce
| October 18, 2019 11:35 AM
Hillary Clinton said that Rep. Tulsi Gabbardis being groomed by Moscow to run as a third-party spoiler candidate in 2020 to help President Trump win reelection.
The former secretary of state pushed the theory on the Campaign HQ podcast hosted by David Plouffe, President Barack Obama’s campaign manager in 2008.
Plouffe and Clinton discussed hurdles the Democratic nominee would face and compared the 2020 race to Clinton’s loss to Trump in 2016. Plouffe asked Clinton about the part third-party candidates, such as Jill Stein of the Green Party, played in 2016, allowing Trump to secure key states.
00:0000:48
Inside the Magazine: October 8
Watch Full Screen to Skip Ads
"They are also going to do third party again," Clinton said. "I'm not making any predictions, but I think they’ve got their eye on somebody who is currently in the Democratic primary and are grooming her to be the third-party candidate," Clinton said, referring to Gabbard, without mentioning the Hawaii representative by name.
"She is a favorite of the Russians. They have a bunch of sites and bots and other ways of supporting her so far. That's assuming Jill Stein will give it up, which she might not because she is also a Russian asset.
"They know they can't win without a third-party candidate, and so I do not know who it is going to be, but I can guarantee you they will have a vigorous third-party challenge in the key states that they most need it."
In Tuesday's Democratic debate, Gabbard accused the New York Times of calling her a "Russian asset."
The newspaper published an Oct. 12 news article about Gabbard stating: "She is injecting a bit of chaos into her own party’s primary race, threatening to boycott that debate to protest what she sees as a 'rigging' of the 2020 election. That’s left some Democrats wondering what, exactly, she is up to in the race, while others worry about supportive signs from online bot activity and the Russian news media,"
Gabbard said on the debate stage: "The New York Times and CNN have also smeared veterans like myself for calling for an end to this regime change war [in Syria]. Just two days ago, the New York Times put out an article saying that I’m a Russian asset and an Assad apologist, and all these different smears."
So does Evan McMullin.
Jesus Christ this gets old. Unless they are rigging votes, who gives a **** if a country tries to manipulate an election in another country? It’s happened for centuries.
It’s up to voters to not be idiots.
So, Gabbard is on-record saying that "Donald Trump should not be charged in the Mueller investigation?"
“now that Mueller has reported that his investigation revealed no such collusion, we all need to put aside our partisan interests and recognize that finding that the president of the United States did not conspire with Russia to interfere with our elections is a good thing for our country.”
Okay... so, let's strictly play politics here.
She releases this:
I don't know squat about the Mueller findings except that apparently it was not enough to make anything stick. Sorry, folks. Wanna put about it? Be my guest. nevertheless, her statement appeals to Trump supporters. And, or even voters who held their nose for Trump, regret it, and are now eager to vote for her because she's interested in going forward and not beating a dead horse about trying to impeach the guy. Trump's first term is in its last year. Would you rather have 4 more years, or get a candidate that can beat him?
All of the candidates are polling better than trump. She’s not some magic bullet.
She’s also the only one against impeachment. Hell, Kaisch is for impeachment.
Last edited:
Well, I would say that if he was impeached, she would vote FOR impeachment. But, she's not obsessed with getting him impeached. And, if you want don't want him to win the election, you'd better forget this impeachment crap. It ain't happening. Be thankful the ship managed to stay afloat. If Democrats want to win, they'd better get something unique and something cool. And, most importantly, something that will make people want to vote for their candidate and NOT Trump. Trump is an asshole, but things aren't that bad... for the time being. Otherwise, he's going to win bigger than before, especially if the economy holds-out. And, then, in his second term (like most GOP presidents) the economy will tank like a bitch and we'll be deep in a ditch. I'd like to avoid that before it gets stuck.
Things. Aren’t. That. Bad. JFC
Yeah, we don’t have a common starting point. This is a waste of time.
Yeah, we don’t have a common starting point. This is a waste of time.
Especially funny considering how they all laughed at Romney for saying what they all firmly believed 4 years later.
I'm sure things were so bad when Obama was in office that you were living under a bridge giving handies for ramen noodles.
I'm glad Trump saved you. Now you can give handies at Mar-A-Lago for lobster from the bus tubs.
Yeah... I'm not buying the Russian Bot bullshit. I'll ask again:
What exactly are "Russian talking points?"
Similar threads
