I've never seen a ref so blatently ignore a player's timeout request, just terrible. Props to Gesell and Fran for not getting T'd up there, would be hard not to lose it when dealing with such incompetence.
after starting the count early. you think that was just mischance based on the rest of the way the game was officiated?
So that what it was. They just said lane violation on TV.It takes a lot of balls to call a team for not lining up for a free throw in time. I would need to warn a team multiple times before I would even think about making that call. It's not like Iowa was getting any sort of advantage.
Gesell and Clemmons are both clearly requesting the timeout BEFORE the whistle was blown and hand raised to stop the clock. If coaches are no longer allowed to request timeouts, then officials had better be paying attention to players.Bo Borowski's 5 second call on Clemmons inbound attempt was correctly called. The 5 second count starts when the ball is at the disposal of the thrower. The ball was at Clemmons feet and he intentionally did not attempt to pick up the ball for at least a three count. His count was clearly at 5 before Gesell or Clemmons attempted to call timeout. Avoiding picking up the ball will not delay the start of an inbounds 5 count.
The officials may have had some questionable calls, but that was not one of them.
As a 30 year veteran high school basketball official, I respectfully disagree with your observation.Clemmons had no idea where the ball was, so no, it was not correctly called
As a 30 year veteran high school basketball official, I respectfully disagree with your observation
That's wonderful. On tv you could clearly see Sapp didn't know where the ball was.
The officials mechanics have nothing to do with the five seconds call. They usually come after the five. So if his hand raised he had already been at five. Hisarm only really matters on Clock stoppageGesell and Clemmons are both clearly requesting the timeout BEFORE the whistle was blown and hand raised to stop the clock. If coaches are no longer allowed to request timeouts, then officials had better be paying attention to players.
The only issue I would have is whether he warned Clemmons to pick the ball up before he started his count. If no warning then it was a bad call. You shouldn't just start counting without the inbounder knowing that you are counting. Not sure if he did or didn't do that. Really no excuse for Clemmons, he let that ball sit there way too long. By doing so he probably pissed off the official and rightly so. That may have had the official not pay as close attention to the timeout call. Don't blame the official for the call because that's a tough judgement between the 5 seconds and the timeout call. Overall I thought it was an ok officiated game. Nothing egregious except for the 4 minutes in the first half where Davis just decided to blatantly hold Jok.Bo Borowski's 5 second call on Clemmons inbound attempt was correctly called. The 5 second count starts when the ball is at the disposal of the thrower. The ball was at Clemmons feet and he intentionally did not attempt to pick up the ball for at least a three count. His count was clearly at 5 before Gesell or Clemmons attempted to call timeout. Avoiding picking up the ball will not delay the start of an inbounds 5 count. The officials may have had some questionable calls, but that was not one of them.
Just curious.. What does 30 years of officiating experience have to do with an observation that a player couldn't find the ball!?As a 30 year veteran high school basketball official, I respectfully disagree with your observation.
By rule, this is not a delay of game warning situation. If the ball is at his feet and makes no attempt to look down at or pickup the ball, the count should start.The only issue I would have is whether he warned Clemmons to pick the ball up before he started his count. If no warning then it was a bad call. You shouldn't just start counting without the inbounder knowing that you are counting. Not sure if he did or didn't do that. Really no excuse for Clemmons, he let that ball sit there way too long. By doing so he probably pissed off the official and rightly so. That may have had the official not pay as close attention to the timeout call. Don't blame the official for the call because that's a tough judgement between the 5 seconds and the timeout call. Overall I thought it was an ok officiated game. Nothing egregious except for the 4 minutes in the first half where Davis just decided to blatantly hold Jok.
I'm guessing you didn't watch the Dayton game.My issue was this. Purdue's game plan was very clearly to be as physical as possible with uthoff and jok. Davis and swanigan beat the hell out of those kids on both ends of the floor and it was ignored basically the whole game. We did dial up our defensive pressure and committed some silly fouls in the 2nd half but it wasn't enough to merit the disparity that was there the majority of the half. And when it looked like Iowa was about to blow the doors off Purdue and run away, that was when the really bad 5 minute stretch of officiating happened and it allowed Purdue back in the game.
It was the worst officiated game of the season no doubt about it but we played through it and got an absolutely huge win. Now it's on to college park on Thursday.
Bo Borowski's 5 second call on Clemmons inbound attempt was correctly called. The 5 second count starts when the ball is at the disposal of the thrower. The ball was at Clemmons feet and he intentionally did not attempt to pick up the ball for at least a three count. His count was clearly at 5 before Gesell or Clemmons attempted to call timeout. Avoiding picking up the ball will not delay the start of an inbounds 5 count.
The officials may have had some questionable calls, but that was not one of them.