to condone the slaughter of innocent children in defense of the 2nd amendment & the gun industry????
how do republicans continue
- Thread starter baddog25
- Start date
because we know that guns can protect innocents from getting slaughtered
50 years ago it was good guys with guns stop bad guys with guns. In today's world good guys with guns stop bad guys with guns. 50 years from now it will be the same.
It's really not that hard as you think.
Let's hear your solution then.
One that will actually fix the problem and not one that merely makes you feel better about yourself because you think you did something.
Because frankly, anything short of 100% zero tolerance gun confiscation is a bandaid. And you'd have to assure everyone that everyone gives up their guns. Because a society like the US that has so many guns in circulation it makes assuring the publics safety nearly impossible if the only ones that are turned in are the ones that are turned in voluntarily.
Aside from the impossibly difficult execution of that policy, a huge percentage of the population that includes me, has zero interest in complying.with such a policy. As such, any party proposing that policy is dooming themselves to electoral failure.
So while so many Democrats decry the Republicans border policy legislative 'failures' (not signing on to the recent senate bill) as an attempt to keep that issue alive by not moving legislation, that has been the Democrat gun control playbook for decades. Why don't they propose a gun confiscation bill? I mean we need real gun reform right? And this is in fact the only solution. Yet it seems they know this is a loser and really seem to just want the issue and don't intend to move forward with what they really want to do. Take everyones guns.
Disclaimer: if it isn’t already apparent, I am a second amendment advocate and I posted on this topic a number of times, in case people are wondering which side I’m on. Frankly, I think we are stuck with this problem until there is a societal change of some sort. I am not for gun confiscation. Yet, I also recognize that if we are going to make this problem go away completely that we have to do the above and I think that’s untenable. And again the reason for that is that no one wants to do what is actually necessary to take away the problem . Like has been mentioned previously as an analogy, the only way to make car accidents go away would be to remove cars. However, no one actually wants to go without their car so unfortunately, we have to live with the fact there are car accidents. This same thing applies to guns unfortunately.
Last edited:
Yesterday’s cop killer was a convicted felon prohibited by law from even being in the same room as a weapon. Stronger gun laws for granny in Des Moines must be enacted now!!!!!!!
Must have more gun laws and fewer prisons:
www.facebook.com
Alpha News
Several sources have identified Shannon Cortez Gooden, 38, as the deceased suspect in the shooting today that killed 2 Burnsville police officers and a fire medic. He petitioned to have his gun...
www.facebook.com
Depends on which side of the coin you're on which is why I kinda said what I said.
For instance I own a handgun but I don't find having assault rifles or anything like that necessary. If it was guaranteed every other civilian and criminal turned in their gun(s) i'd oblige by turning mine in as well.
Last edited:
Guns shots are the number one cause of death for people under the age of 18.
Last edited:
Your comment will bring out the “a gun has never shot itself” numpties.
I go with “bullet holes are the number one cause of death for people under the age of 18”
How is support for 2A condoning the slaughter of innocent children?
Charlie Kirk says gun deaths "unfortunately" worth it to keep 2nd Amendment
The conservative founder of Turning Point USA made the comments following a mass shooting in Nashville last week that resulted in six deaths.
www.newsweek.com
If leftists were banned from owning guns then violent crime would plummet by 90ish percent.
it isn't dems with pockets stuffed with greenbacks from the NRA & the gun manufacturers.
hell i'm not anti-2A but when even 85% of NRA members are for common sense legislation like background checks and they refuse to pass them. WTF?
Dems pockets are stuffed by the military industrial complex lol they're making their fortunes on actual weapons of war.
Says the guy that is cool with abortion killing millions...
So the democratic party who wants to defund the police, not prosecute criminals, advocate for cashless bail and encourage unlimited illegal immigration for any thug that wants to expand his criminal empire, now wants to stop law abiding, crime victims from protecting themselves with the only defense they have left, a gun. Whose side is the left on anyway?
Says the guy who doesn't care about said kids till AFTER they've been born
Last edited:
Is that supposed to be a response to my question? Charlie Kirk is a nut. How about responding in your own words.Charlie Kirk says gun deaths "unfortunately" worth it to keep 2nd Amendment
The conservative founder of Turning Point USA made the comments following a mass shooting in Nashville last week that resulted in six deaths.
nuns-on-a-bus called them out. their not pro life, their pro birth. after that their on their own.
Where in the NRA platform do they say it's OK to support killing innocent children?
Why are guns responsible for killing innocent children? In the US, guns have never been intended for that purpose.
What are your examples of "common sense" regulation? That phrase has become a talking point with very little meaning.
common sense = gun confiscation
DEI = discriminate against anyone who might vote Republican or has traditional American values.
Let's see;
Last 20 years
Average number of children deaths related to guns - 1700 yearly. (Majority are young blacks)
Average number of legal abortions - 620,000 per year. (Majority are blacks)
I'd say the blacks have the biggest bitch in this argument.
Restrictive gun laws work...they really, really do!! Just ask the two cops and medic who got dead yesterday.
Let’s play this game. Suppose liberals get their way and all guns are banned in the United States.
What happens next?
The Federal government takes complete control.
Lol. The government has complete control regardless.
The question is to how will a federal ban solve the problem of gun violence against children.
Nothing, there is no way the thugs/criminals are turning in their guns so they only people who would be adversely affected by a ban would be law abiding citizens, the same people who always follow the law. That's why this is nothing more than a ploy by the left to have naive morons vote dem because "they care" for the victims.
The only people that would have guns would be criminals who would have a ton more power. It would also encourage many people to buy guns on the black market. Banning alcohol didn’t seem to impact anything.
