No, but he is extremely loyal.
I would agree, a very noble trait that we value in Fran and our family, friends, and associates.
The slippery side of loyalty is loss of objectivity. Fiercely royal coaches can stick to a strategy or players, for all the wrong reasons. For example, 1 might use the Oregon game last year and posit that sticking with a lineup of injured season long starters, ConMac and CJ. versus healthy players is an example of this. Had Fran been less loyal to those kids he might have recognized that kids that were defensively challenged to start, while playing injured, might be exposed to a team of very athletic players.
or maybe stubbornness is another comparative for loyalty? One could say that Fran is ’loyal’ to his 1st half 2 foul rule, where he stubbornly sticks to or is loyal too, this strategy? (and we know how soft Iowas started play in the 1h).
or maybe pride is another comparator? If one changes personnel, strategy, etc mid season, or changes a long held tenet (like the 1st half 2 foul rule, or always choosing to optimize scoring efficiency vs blending with some defensive efficiency) then one could be open to criticism that they were initially wrong, a very difficult thing for a prideful person to admit.
i like Fran a lot, i like his style of play, I’m glad he‘s at IOWA and he can stay as long as he wants.
(but I really hopes he takes the early season advice, changes his rotations, and plays Kris and Perk more)