ADVERTISEMENT

If project 25 becomes reality

If project 25 becomes the new America, will you stay?

  • Moving out of the fascist country

    Votes: 9 18.8%
  • Hell no, staying put. **** your socialist public programs

    Votes: 8 16.7%
  • Reluctantly staying to see what happens

    Votes: 14 29.2%
  • What’s project 25?

    Votes: 12 25.0%
  • See results

    Votes: 5 10.4%

  • Total voters
    48
Do you even pay attention to what people in your party advocate for? Are you trolling?? Absolutely they effing do. Damn, open your eyes and ears. Or stop gaslighting us.

They don't. It's common for conservative Iowans to know every little detail about everything Nancy Pelosi does they don't like or Biden or someone like that but have ZERO idea kim reynolds got caught driving while drunk or graduated from college right before becoming governor. It's head in sand for a lot of these folks.
 
But you're ok with someone who rapes women and sleeps with porn stars?
So you justify thousands of innocent kids being mutilated because 1 guy slept with a porn star. Brilliant

Ftr, I don't condone the behavior of trump, nor do I condone the creepiness of biden and the possible inappropriate behavior he had with his daughter.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: McLovin32
So you justify thousands of innocent kids being mutilated because 1 guy slept with a porn star. Brilliant

Ftr, I don't condone the behavior of trump, nor do I condone the creepiness of biden and the possible inappropriate behavior he had with his daughter.
The only difference is trump is an adjudicated rapist and a convicted felon.

I get that it's fun to use buzz words like "mutilating" children, but not if you want to have a serious conversation. While our opinions on the subject may differ, I doubt anyone on this board is in favor of mutilating children.
 
  • Like
Reactions: McLovin32
So you justify thousands of innocent kids being mutilated because 1 guy slept with a porn star. Brilliant

Ftr, I don't condone the behavior of trump, nor do I condone the creepiness of biden and the possible inappropriate behavior he had with his daughter.
Link to your data? How many thousands?

You're a hack.
 
  • Like
Reactions: McLovin32
The only difference is trump is an adjudicated rapist and a convicted felon.

I get that it's fun to use buzz words like "mutilating" children, but not if you want to have a serious conversation. While our opinions on the subject may differ, I doubt anyone on this board is in favor of mutilating children.
If you support gender transition for kids then you support the mutilation of children. You can downplay it all you want, but there are many on this board who support it. The Biden administration supports it. It's sick and it's wrong. I applaud you if you don't support it, but many do.
 
If you support gender transition for kids then you support the mutilation of children. You can downplay it all you want, but there are many on this board who support it. The Biden administration supports it. It's sick and it's wrong. I applaud you if you don't support it, but many do.
That's the problem when relying on a whataboutism argument. You're often far from the truth of your perceived analogy. I'm not in favor of ALL gender affirming care methods. I'm definitely not in favor of gender transition care without parental consent. It's why I don't register for any one party. I don't agree with the entire ticket.

That doesn't change the fact that you support an adjudicated rapist, convicted felon and accused child molester.

But good job on the hyperbole.
 
Independent thought is not a trait associated with ignorance,... continue chasing the lemming in front of you.

lemmings GIF
What is independant thought worth when based on incomplete data?
 
If you support gender transition for kids then you support the mutilation of children. You can downplay it all you want, but there are many on this board who support it. The Biden administration supports it. It's sick and it's wrong. I applaud you if you don't support it, but many do.
Again, where are your numbers coming from to support your claim of thousands getting these procedures?

Or are you just making stuff up again?
 
Abolishing the federal reserve

Abolishing the NOAA

Eliminating the Dept. of Education

Eliminating free school meals

Eliminating head start

Firing all State department leaders and replacing them with "acting" leaders who are personally loyal to the Fuher.

Allowing the president to fire pretty much any DOJ employee.

Making porn illegal

See, Trump doesn't support Project 2025, but he does support all those things. Libturds doing their usual lying about Trump supporting Project 2025! !
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hawked
Great thing about Project 2025 is they can push individual lines and because the whole thing was enacted as ‘Project 2025’ they can say it didn’t happen.
 
That's the problem when relying on a whataboutism argument. You're often far from the truth of your perceived analogy. I'm not in favor of ALL gender affirming care methods. I'm definitely not in favor of gender transition care without parental consent. It's why I don't register for any one party. I don't agree with the entire ticket.

That doesn't change the fact that you support an adjudicated rapist, convicted felon and accused child molester.

But good job on the hyperbole.
I think the whole rapist and convicted felon is way overplayed. Trump has been a powerful person for a long time. Women have been known to try to get with powerful people so that they can either enjoy the lifestyle or benefit from that power in some way. So while I doubt Trump was totally innocent, the woman was not innocent either. The thing about rape is that in some ways its a mindset. If she wanted sex at 2am when she was drunk, but then regretted it in the morning, this could be considered rape. This is a long ways from a person breaking into your house and raping you while you are sleeping. This is not to minimize rape, but to say there are shades of gray when it comes to this stuff. I do not believe Trump violently raped her against her will.

As far as the convicted felon stuff, I believe trump has been charged with things that a normal person would not have been charged with. This is weaponization of the justice system. The left have used creative ways to charge trump for the stuff they have and this has only reinforced my thoughts about how slimy the current democrats are and how they will go to any length to win. I fully believe they would kill trump if they thought they could get away with it.
 
I think the whole rapist and convicted felon is way overplayed. Trump has been a powerful person for a long time. Women have been known to try to get with powerful people so that they can either enjoy the lifestyle or benefit from that power in some way. So while I doubt Trump was totally innocent, the woman was not innocent either. The thing about rape is that in some ways its a mindset. If she wanted sex at 2am when she was drunk, but then regretted it in the morning, this could be considered rape. This is a long ways from a person breaking into your house and raping you while you are sleeping. This is not to minimize rape, but to say there are shades of gray when it comes to this stuff. I do not believe Trump violently raped her against her will.

As far as the convicted felon stuff, I believe trump has been charged with things that a normal person would not have been charged with. This is weaponization of the justice system. The left have used creative ways to charge trump for the stuff they have and this has only reinforced my thoughts about how slimy the current democrats are and how they will go to any length to win. I fully believe they would kill trump if they thought they could get away with it.
You are completely brainwashed.

Do you understand the circumstances around Trump's sexual assault case? My guess is you have no idea.

Your views on rape are despicable.
 
  • Like
Reactions: EasyHawk
Has any poster on this board read the full 900+ page document and came here to articulate everything about it?
Or are we just calling it bad and copy pasting articles saying it's bad?
No I haven't and no I won't. I don't need to. People who are a lot smarter than me on this subject and get paid to read 900+ page legal documents have already done it and explained some of the things that are in it. What has been explained so far is horrific. So if there is more in there that not reading it myself would have brought to light, it's not good for Project 2025.

So, you might think you sound smart and witty with this debate approach but you make the same mistake that all MAGA's make. Nobody can be an expert in everything and nobody should be "doing their own research" on everything. Because those people always end up being wrong and complete jackasses even if they are too dumb to realize it. Instead, let people who know WTF they are talking about do their job and then listen to the reports they give.

BTW, nobody is refuting what these people say are in it. The debate is on whether or not you think Trump and the people he will appoint, you know, most of the authors of Project 2025, will actually implement it. Only marks trust Trump.
 
The left makes up 97ish% of education and they have been forcing liberal policies with declining benchmarks.

Soros has been funding liberal judges to get elected so they will enforce or not enforce items important to them.

Dems have been very organized to get people to go along with the media and misinformation censorship, covid conspiracy, prosecution of trump while allowing Hillary and the 51 fbi people to go free. They got half the world to go along with transing kids.

I think the covid lies from the gov, supporting transitioning kids and allowing boys to compete as girls, prosecuting trump while ignoring hillary, and the open borders are what pushed people over the edge.

All of this made republican politicians realize they had to get organized if they wanted to beat the dem globalist elite cult.
No Child Left Behind, numnuts.
 
No I haven't and no I won't. I don't need to. People who are a lot smarter than me on this subject and get paid to read 900+ page legal documents have already done it and explained some of the things that are in it. What has been explained so far is horrific. So if there is more in there that not reading it myself would have brought to light, it's not good for Project 2025.

So, you might think you sound smart and witty with this debate approach but you make the same mistake that all MAGA's make. Nobody can be an expert in everything and nobody should be "doing their own research" on everything. Because those people always end up being wrong and complete jackasses even if they are too dumb to realize it. Instead, let people who know WTF they are talking about do their job and then listen to the reports they give.

BTW, nobody is refuting what these people say are in it. The debate is on whether or not you think Trump and the people he will appoint, you know, most of the authors of Project 2025, will actually implement it. Only marks trust Trump.
Who do you trust to explain this to you? this is where I see the problem. You oppose virtually every position I have. I know for a fact that your position is wrong on multiple issues because I am an expert in those areas. I do not need to depend on someone to analyze issues like covid or trans because I understand the data and I am in the field.

You are very wrong on those issues which tells me that you have poor judgement in who to trust and you don't understand the info enough to be discussing it. This is why people like you end up name calling. You don't have the knowledge to back up what you are saying, you are just repeating what someone told you. I can only assume that when you are wrong on multiple issues that you are probably wrong on project 2025 as well. Its easy to spew the rhetoric from the view, but that doesn't mean you are right.

At some point you have to fact check your sources. You have called me a conspiracy theorist before and yet I have been right on most of the stuff I have spewed on this board.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Tom Paris
BTW, nobody is refuting what these people say are in it. The debate is on whether or not you think Trump and the people he will appoint, you know, most of the authors of Project 2025, will actually implement it. Only marks trust Trump.
Its funny that people like you think its great that the department of education is run by 97% liberals and you fear going back to a system where education is actually meant to teach the kids rather than indoctrinate them with leftist woke ideology.

You fear the idea of getting rid of excess bureaucracy because it means the left will not be able to weaponize the justice system or allow a network to create open borders with 10+ million illegals coming into the country in 3 years. You are pathetic.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Tom Paris
Fear is the only thing they have to sell right now.
Which is why you've heard 'Jan 6th' and 'threat to democracy' non-stop since Trump announced for Pres.

I like what Shapiro had to say at the hearings the other day in a back and forth with Swalwell:

"Like President Trump, I haven't looked all that deeply at Project 2025, but it seems that Democrats on this committee are sort of like Peter Pan and Tinker Bell," Shapiro responded. "If they say Project 2025 enough, their presidential candidate becomes alive again."
 
Latest project 2025 reporting says trump is going to ban pineapples on pizza. Any truth to this guys? I am very scared right now!
 
Its funny that people like you think its great that the department of education is run by 97% liberals and you fear going back to a system where education is actually meant to teach the kids rather than indoctrinate them with leftist woke ideology.

You fear the idea of getting rid of excess bureaucracy because it means the left will not be able to weaponize the justice system or allow a network to create open borders with 10+ million illegals coming into the country in 3 years. You are pathetic.
Your first paragraph is ironic when one reads your post right above it. You’re ignorant about education and what’s being taught but here you are spouting lies.
 
Why do you put a nonstop liar and conman as your beacon of truth?? Can you not learn??
I didn't make any comment about truth. My comment is that agenda 47 is what Trump says he supports, not project 25.

Obviously trump makes a lot of false statements.
 
I didn't make any comment about truth. My comment is that agenda 47 is what Trump says he supports, not project 25.

Obviously trump makes a lot of false statements.
The people that fund Trump supports this. The same people he surrounded himself during his administration. But yeah, he has no affinity to them.

You guys are such rubes.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: doughuddl2
I didn't make any comment about truth. My comment is that agenda 47 is what Trump says he supports, not project 25.

Obviously trump makes a lot of false statements.
I saw a headline on social media (so take it for what it's worth) that Heritage Foundation is considering changing the name to Agenda 47 considering the backlash Project 25 is receiving. So maybe those policies will merge into one.

I didn't read the article. Looked like click bait.
 
I didn't make any comment about truth. My comment is that agenda 47 is what Trump says he supports, not project 25.

Obviously trump makes a lot of false statements.
Again, my point stands. You believe a serial liar who has had members who helped create Project 2025 in his administration. Seriously, is believing Trump on this what your common sense says to do?? Mine KNOWS he will implement Project 2025, mostly because it assures him loyalists all around him in government positions.
 
  • Like
Reactions: funksouljon
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT