If project 25 becomes reality

[ButtersHawk]

No I haven't and no I won't. I don't need to. People who are a lot smarter than me on this subject and get paid to read 900+ page legal documents have already done it and explained some of the things that are in it. What has been explained so far is horrific. So if there is more in there that not reading it myself would have brought to light, it's not good for Project 2025.

So, you might think you sound smart and witty with this debate approach but you make the same mistake that all MAGA's make. Nobody can be an expert in everything and nobody should be "doing their own research" on everything. Because those people always end up being wrong and complete jackasses even if they are too dumb to realize it. Instead, let people who know WTF they are talking about do their job and then listen to the reports they give.

BTW, nobody is refuting what these people say are in it. The debate is on whether or not you think Trump and the people he will appoint, you know, most of the authors of Project 2025, will actually implement it. Only marks trust Trump.

Not trying to be witty I was actually wondering if anyone on this heavily liberal bosrd read it or not. So we should let the good folks in the media tell us whether it's good or bad?
You know those same good folk in the media that said Joe Biden is fine? It wasn't that long ago a prominent cuddle buddy of Joe Biden told us "I'm about to hit you with the truth, and FU if you can't handle the truth. This is the best Joe Biden has ever been."
Then this same cuddle buddy 15 minutes later said Joe is too old and gone and should step down. Nobody needs to be an expert in everything but you should at least try to do your own research.

Dude chill once I heard porn would be illegal I said I'd vote Biden.

 

[funksouljon]

Again, my point stands. You believe a serial liar who has had members who helped create Project 2025 in his administration. Seriously, is believing Trump on this what your common sense says to do?? Mine KNOWS he will implement Project 2025, mostly because it assures him loyalists all around him in government positions.

And it may be more of an approach that the people around him are going to implement as much as possible and he will not be aware (nudge nudge wink wink) that the policies they are moving forward with are in alignment with the P2025. This approach is exactly how he has stayed out of trouble for so many decades. Esp with the overlap of 2025 contributors and the staff he holds.

 

[TylerJ23]

Did you even read it?? Thanks for proving it’s not a lie. All schools that receive federal funding…that’s public schools. Not private. If you’re going to link 900 pages you might want to peek at the page you say I’m lying about. I originally put “allegedly”. That’s not needed anymore. It’s a thing.

I’ll be damn.
I was wrong.
You were right.
I missed it.

I apologize for calling you a liar. Very inappropriate

 

[Tom Paris]

I’ll be damn.
I was wrong.
You were right.
I missed it.

I apologize for calling you a liar. Very inappropriate

Not sure if serious. 🤣🤣🤷🏻‍♂️

 

[TylerJ23]

Not sure if serious. 🤣🤣🤷🏻‍♂️

I am.

 

[Tom Paris]

I am.

Thank you and I respect you for that, sir.

 

[TylerJ23]

Thank you and I respect you for that, sir.

Sometimes I have a hard time believing how far the GOP will go.

Just blinded by own political beliefs I suppose

 

[CRazzle]

Sometimes I have a hard time believing how far the GOP will go.

Just blinded by own political beliefs I suppose

Now you're getting it.

Let the other rubes here know it as well.

 

[funksouljon]

Now you're getting it.

Let the other rubes here know it as well.

Might be better to refer to them as something other than rubes. Some are, some aren't, but even the ones who are don't realize it.

Just saying.

 

[BobSanders_33]

I hear 1000x more from the left about project 2025 than I do the right. Interesting..

Because it’s a secret. Shhhhhhh.

 

[BioHawk]

Not trying to be witty I was actually wondering if anyone on this heavily liberal bosrd read it or not. So we should let the good folks in the media tell us whether it's good or bad?
You know those same good folk in the media that said Joe Biden is fine? It wasn't that long ago a prominent cuddle buddy of Joe Biden told us "I'm about to hit you with the truth, and FU if you can't handle the truth. This is the best Joe Biden has ever been."
Then this same cuddle buddy 15 minutes later said Joe is too old and gone and should step down. Nobody needs to be an expert in everything but you should at least try to do your own research.

Dude chill once I heard porn would be illegal I said I'd vote Biden.

Who's listening to the media? All the media has done for two weeks is talk about how Biden needs to drop out. Trump has been wandering around like a lost alzheimer's patient for a year and they haven't said shit about that. I'm reading things from different lawyers who have commented on it. Again, if what they were saying is false, and those things then get repeated by the media, then there would be a cacophony of voices calling them out on it. But instead of saying it's false, they just say that "Trump said one time that he doesn't agree with all of it". That's hardly reassuring, even if you take the statement at face value. You are an idiot if you do that though.

The point is, don't imply that if you haven't read 900+ pages of a document written by and for lawyers that you don't have any right to comment on it, especially when the consensus is the things being reported about it are accurate. Now, if you are disputing the facts as they have been agreed to, yeah, you need to read it. But if you are just commenting on if those things are good or bad, no, you don't need to have read the actual document.