ADVERTISEMENT

Indiana laying a turd

It seemed as if the officials decided they'd already put in 4 quarters worth of work and a flight was waiting and they weren't going to work anymore overtimes. LOL
 
Looks like a missed call but what the heck was that play calling in OT? End around to a slow white receiver when you have Sudfield tearing it up. Go for the win.
 
The ball appeared to be above the uprights, and I learned from Koehn's similar miss this year that anything above the upright is rule a miss.
 
  • Like
Reactions: millah_22
That field goal looked good from the angle looking up and really questionable from the shot at the back end of the stadium. Either way, how is that not reviewable?

It's time for uprights with lasers :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Menace Sockeyes
From a credible source on Reddit, He was a referee in the NCAA for many years:

Watch the high angle from behind the goal post. There is no way that ball was entirely inside the post. The whole ball has to be inside the whole post to be good. The low angle shot is a terrible angle because you're looking at an angle toward the post. Where is the best place to judge whether it was over or inside the post as it crosses? Right where the official is standing looking straight up the post.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ichawk24
From a credible source on Reddit, He was a referee in the NCAA for many years:

Watch the high angle from behind the goal post. There is no way that ball was entirely inside the post. The whole ball has to be inside the whole post to be good. The low angle shot is a terrible angle because you're looking at an angle toward the post. Where is the best place to judge whether it was over or inside the post as it crosses? Right where the official is standing looking straight up the post.

He's only credible if he has a name. Otherwise he's just another anonymous person on the internet posing as someone with "special" insight. Btw, I like the suggestion made above about lasers. Combine them with a motion sensor and they only have to flash for a second . . . for you wary pilots reading this post.
 
He's only credible if he has a name. Otherwise he's just another anonymous person on the internet posing as someone with "special" insight. Btw, I like the suggestion made above about lasers. Combine them with a motion sensor and they only have to flash for a second . . . for you wary pilots reading this post.
Considering that Reddit has a pretty reliable verification process, I'll go ahead and believe that he has given proof.
 
From a credible source on Reddit, He was a referee in the NCAA for many years:

Watch the high angle from behind the goal post. There is no way that ball was entirely inside the post. The whole ball has to be inside the whole post to be good. The low angle shot is a terrible angle because you're looking at an angle toward the post. Where is the best place to judge whether it was over or inside the post as it crosses? Right where the official is standing looking straight up the post.
Do they look up, though? Usually it looks like they just stare straight ahead and try to determine out of the corner or their eyes if the ball was either inside or outside the upright above them........................................seems like a legit method.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT