Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
[/QUOTE]Very true. However, they went from bad (like Rutgers bad) to being decent this year.
With Iowa not running up the score on anyone (except Rutgers), I fully expect the game to be within 2 TD's.
QUOTE="Gridiron24, post: 7092837, member: 26670"]We did beat them 63-0 last year...
Which version of Stanley?The Hawkeyes are going to win this game by 14+ probably something like 27-10
Which version of Stanley?
They didn't have Lovie calling the defense prior to this year. Six defensive touchdowns this year heading into this past Saturday... Six! Do we have 6 turnovers this season? Fluke? Maybe. But, he had the same type of effects in his very first years in STL and Chicago in the NFL. With our offensive struggles, you had better be concerned. Not afraid. We can win. But, using last year as a barometer would be a mistake.We did beat them 63-0 last year...
Which version of Stanley?
we have more than 6 INTS, so yes.....They didn't have Lovie calling the defense prior to this year. Six defensive touchdowns this year heading into this past Saturday... Six! Do we have 6 turnovers this season? Fluke? Maybe. But, he had the same type of effects in his very first years in STL and Chicago in the NFL. With our offensive struggles, you had better be concerned. Not afraid. We can win. But, using last year as a barometer would be a mistake.
can or will?i said before the minny game that this is the exact type of team under KF which can beat minny then turn around and lose to Illinois, historically. it's just that type of feel to it this year. kind of like that year a couple of years ago when iowa lost to PU
Granted the Huskers only scored 21 points yesterday primarily due to their own ineptitude and Frosty's normal questionable play calling in enemy territory. They amassed 493 yards of total offense, had Mills run for 188 yards on 17 carries (11 yard average) and in the second half averaged 10.3 yards per play while scoring 7 points. I don't think there was much about the Badgers' defense that was very effective. Martinez went brain dead on one pass play and took a 20 yard loss, otherwise he averaged 7.3 ypc on his other 15 carries. Wisky apparently needed a different spy.Good game for us before Nebraska. Both Illinois and Nebraska have QB's that can beat you with their feet. Wisconsin put a lb spy on Martinez and was very effective. We will need something similar. This is the reason these two games have always worried me.
we have more than 6 INTS, so yes.....
I agree about last year. Then again using their wiscy game(like many here seem to) is also a mistake
can or will?
you calling your shot or not?
ha ha , with this team, and after yesterday, I can't call anything. it's wide open and up in the air.we have more than 6 INTS, so yes.....
I agree about last year. Then again using their wiscy game(like many here seem to) is also a mistake
can or will?
you calling your shot or not?
I agree... Illinois is improved. Hope we take care of business and don't take them lightly.Seems too high to me.
we have two nfl coaches going against one another. one of them more recent in the nfl than the otherI agree... Illinois is improved. Hope we take care of business and don't take them lightly.
Maybe they didn't see this game is at 11am and not a night time blackout in Kinnick. Hopefully we can drum up the same Kinnick mojo for an early kickoff.....I agree... Illinois is improved. Hope we take care of business and don't take them lightly.
So like most years the past 2 decades then?ha ha , with this team, and after yesterday, I can't call anything. it's wide open and up in the air.
tell them betting on sports isn't the most sound investment....well unless you're taking the under on an Iowa game!We have 8 picks and 5 fumble recoveries in 10 games. We have a very sound defense. We have zero defensive touchdowns on the season. I'm making no call about the game or the Wisconsin game as impact. I'm just saying, as I said this summer when I learned Lovie had not been (I was shocked) calling defenses and that he now would be, that Illinois would be a bowl-caliber team. I'm just trying to help people invest their money wisely. Additionally, Illinois has a number of transfers from USC, etc. This game may be another blowout, but there is almost no similarity in the opponent a year later. I thought Minnesota was way overhyped, and I think Illinois is underhyped. I will be thrilled if we just win.
Apparently you didn't watch the game then, or didn't understand what you were watching. Yes, Martinez did make several big runs, but, he got stuffed on many more and on big, critical downs in the game. Statistics don't always tell the whole story.Granted the Huskers only scored 21 points yesterday primarily due to their own ineptitude and Frosty's normal questionable play calling in enemy territory. They amassed 493 yards of total offense, had Mills run for 188 yards on 17 carries (11 yard average) and in the second half averaged 10.3 yards per play while scoring 7 points. I don't think there was much about the Badgers' defense that was very effective. Martinez went brain dead on one pass play and took a 20 yard loss, otherwise he averaged 7.3 ypc on his other 15 carries. Wisky apparently needed a different spy.
Yep, watched 90% of the game but have to wonder what you were watching. Granted Martinez was the Badgers' main priority in the zone read option but he still had 309 yards of total offense Saturday. Meanwhile, Iowa as a team gained 295 yards last Saturday versus Wisky. Iowa had 87 yards rushing (3.8 ypc) against UW while Nebby had 273 (7.4 ypc). Dedrick Mills came into their game Saturday with 398 yards rushing on the year at 4.4 ypc and ran for 188 yards on 17 carries (11.1 ypc) and on many carries wasn't getting touched until he was 10 yards downfield. The main reason the Badgers were victorious on Saturday is because Frosty is the coach in Lincoln.Apparently you didn't watch the game then, or didn't understand what you were watching. Yes, Martinez did make several big runs, but, he got stuffed on many more and on big, critical downs in the game. Statistics don't always tell the whole story.
I am not really trying to be a jerk about this, but have to ask how you measure effectiveness. Before Saturday, Martinez was 110-185 for 1492 yards throwing the ball for an 8.1 yard average per attempt. Saturday he was 13-23 for 220 yards for a 9.5 yard average per attempt. Before Saturday he had rushed 97 times for 399 yards for 4.1 ypc. Saturday he ran 16 times for 89 yards which is 5.6 ypc. So for each play against Wisconsin he averaged 1 1/2 yards more than his body of work on the season. It sure doesn't seem like that spy situation was very successful to me!Good game for us before Nebraska. Both Illinois and Nebraska have QB's that can beat you with their feet. Wisconsin put a lb spy on Martinez and was very effective. We will need something similar. This is the reason these two games have always worried me.
What round does your Stanley go in the NFLThe version of Stanley you get when the offensive line gives him time to throw the ball...the version you get when running backs break open big runs...the version you get when blitzing backers are blocked out of the play... the version you get when BF opens the play book should I go on?
Yes it does. Illinois is coming in hot and on a major streak right now. We need to take this game very seriously and play our best. They will also be motivated by the severe beat down they took last year.Seems too high to me.
Gambling is not a wise investment.We have 8 picks and 5 fumble recoveries in 10 games. We have a very sound defense. We have zero defensive touchdowns on the season. I'm making no call about the game or the Wisconsin game as impact. I'm just saying, as I said this summer when I learned Lovie had not been (I was shocked) calling defenses and that he now would be, that Illinois would be a bowl-caliber team. I'm just trying to help people invest their money wisely. Additionally, Illinois has a number of transfers from USC, etc. This game may be another blowout, but there is almost no similarity in the opponent a year later. I thought Minnesota was way overhyped, and I think Illinois is underhyped. I will be thrilled if we just win.
Good game for us before Nebraska. Both Illinois and Nebraska have QB's that can beat you with their feet. Wisconsin put a lb spy on Martinez and was very effective. We will need something similar. This is the reason these two games have always worried me.
How can you worry about Illinois without thinking about them?Guys, let's worry about Illinois first before we start thinking about Illinois.
Very true. However, they went from bad (like Rutgers bad) to being decent this year.
With Iowa not running up the score on anyone (except Rutgers), I fully expect the game to be within 2 TD's.
How can you worry about Illinois without thinking about them?