ADVERTISEMENT

Iowa 2017-2018 National Champs

  • Thread starter anon_0pi0cv8t1ggvb
  • Start date
LOL.

Let's address:

1. Huh? Did I say Tomasello was better than Gilman or others in the Iowa room? Way to create a massive strawman and proclaim your victory for knocking it down. Very impressive. There's a difference between the practice room and wrestling actual live matches, which is something you don't seem to grasp. Tomasello is a physical beast. Spencer Lee is an undersized true freshman coming off a torn labrum two years ago and a torn ACL less than a year ago. He's not even medically cleared to go live or even drill and it's October.

2. Oh no, you mean the Brands brothers aren't coming here for advice on how to run the team? I guess we should just shut down the board so you can keep jerking off to the "inside info" you allegedly possess and yet so rarely are able to produce. But keep throwing out vague statements that can sometimes eventually be tied to something that eventually happens, Ms. Cleo.

3. Because Spencer Lee could be the key to 4 straight championship teams and 4 straight individual championships, so I think it's a waste to throw him out there in a year where we have no shot at a team title and where his path to the first title is more difficult than it needs to be.

4. You are the one who has repeatedly claimed you were putting me on ignore, and yet constantly respond, so maybe you could just suck on my giant penis, you weak-willed buffoon? I have never placed anyone on ignore, nor will I. Opposing view points and trolls, and even fake insiders do not affect my enjoyment of posting on the forums.

5. I said I would pay the $100 by the end of the year. I will. I never said I was a "big shot attorney". I've been very open about the fact that I have worked as a Public Defender for years to qualify for the public loan forgiveness program. But keep shooting your shot, man. Whenever you get into specifics, you are almost always wrong, but perhaps some vague generalities might get you back on track?

Hahaha!!! You've got a shitty memory and an even shittier grasp on reality about what goes on inside the practice room in Iowa City.... You're like the dog that only barks when he's on his chain... Just a remarkably bitch made mark.

This is the part where I let your dominate inner 14 year old get the last word... Again.
 
Hahaha!!! You've got a shitty memory and an even shittier grasp on reality about what goes on inside the practice room in Iowa City.... You're like the dog that only barks when he's on his chain... Just a remarkably bitch made mark.

This is the part where I let your dominate inner 14 year old get the last word... Again.

True rhetorical brilliance once again. Maybe give us some vague, unprovable percentages about recruits again? That usually gets you feeling better about yourself.
 
Did I miss something? How in the World does his post have ANYTHING to do with you? I would say you look like the one that has an obsession clouding judgement.

Did I miss something? How in the World does his post have ANYTHING to do with you? I would say you look like the one that has an obsession clouding judgement.

You missed the other thread, but thanks for your devoted concern.
 
LOL.

Let's address:

1. Huh? Did I say Tomasello was better than Gilman or others in the Iowa room? Way to create a massive strawman and proclaim your victory for knocking it down. Very impressive. There's a difference between the practice room and wrestling actual live matches, which is something you don't seem to grasp. Tomasello is a physical beast. Spencer Lee is an undersized true freshman coming off a torn labrum two years ago and a torn ACL less than a year ago. He's not even medically cleared to go live or even drill and it's October.

2. Oh no, you mean the Brands brothers aren't coming here for advice on how to run the team? I guess we should just shut down the board so you can keep jerking off to the "inside info" you allegedly possess and yet so rarely are able to produce. But keep throwing out vague statements that can sometimes eventually be tied to something that eventually happens, Ms. Cleo.

3. Because Spencer Lee could be the key to 4 straight championship teams and 4 straight individual championships, so I think it's a waste to throw him out there in a year where we have no shot at a team title and where his path to the first title is more difficult than it needs to be.

4. You are the one who has repeatedly claimed you were putting me on ignore, and yet constantly respond, so maybe you could just suck on my giant penis, you weak-willed buffoon? Have you ever heard that "vulgarity is the crutch of the conversational cripple"? No, of course not, that would require a degree of literacy obviously not present in your writing. I have never placed anyone on ignore, nor will I. Opposing view points and trolls, and even fake insiders do not affect my enjoyment of posting on the forums.

5. I said I would pay the $100 by the end of the year. I will. I never said I was a "big shot attorney". I've been very open about the fact that I have worked as a Public Defender for years to qualify for the public loan forgiveness program. But keep shooting your shot, man. Whenever you get into specifics, you are almost always wrong, but perhaps some vague generalities might get you back on track?

Did he really go 'suck my giant p*nis' and then chastise someone else on vulgarity? Did he realize what he did there?
 
Did he really go 'suck my giant p*nis' and then chastise someone else on vulgarity? Did he realize what he did there?

Of course I did. He called me a giant penis, so I responded with the same phrase turned to a different purpose. Pretty standard rhetorical device.
 
Of course I did. He called me a giant penis, so I responded with the same phrase turned to a different purpose. Pretty standard rhetorical device.

May be standard but really diminishes your point about vulgarity when you use vulgarity.
 
Twice. TWICE! It was amazing. And then Gilman beating him again at WTT. So great.

Lol that's just a lack of situational awareness and offensive diversity. It was glorious!

Gilman just wanted it more than he did and is so dang strong. He may not be as strong in the weight room as NATO (who I really respect and like, so fOSU fans don't get mad) but his grip for sure is stronger.
 
Lol that's just a lack of situational awareness and offensive diversity. It was glorious!

Gilman just wanted it more than he did and is so dang strong. He may not be as strong in the weight room as NATO (who I really respect and like, so fOSU fans don't get mad) but his grip for sure is stronger.

I like NATO too but damn if it isn’t cool to see him get big brothered by Clark and Gilman.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DayHawk18
Gotta dream bigger than that buddy.

Dream bigger? I'm not trying to get crushed...Now I am willing to add Jennifer Lawrence and Emily Ratajkowski to my previous duo. You forced me to it PBS.

I'm willing to let the hefty ones go to the Hogg...he clearly likes em rolled in sh*t, 200+, and from the barn.
 
125: 1st place Lee
141: 3rd place Lugo
149: 2nd place (or 1st on a good day) Sorensen
157: 1st place Kemerer
165: 3rd place Marinelli
184: 1St place Downey
197: don't even need it, but 3rd place Warner
Hwt: 3rd place Stoll

Iowa 2018 NCAA champs.

Goodnight.
Too much vodka in Iowa?
The Nature Nuts from Columbus haven't gift wrapped anything.
Of course, poor luck health wise can monkey wrench the guts out of any good plan.
 
The new stalling call on the top man for having the legs in in the standing postition no matter if they were in before of after a guy stands up makes getting out from under Zain just a little more realistic. That was kind of his go to move if a guy actually was able to get to his feet. He would have lost to the Okie State kid last year if that rule was in place.
No. The ref warned and then penalized Zain as it was. Zain wrestled within the rules, Haggerty did not have a good match.
If the rules last year had already been changed to what they read this year my guess is Zain would have made the necessary adjustments.
In case you are wondering I thought the way the rule had been written was horsepuky. If the rule for every other situation of bottom wrestler gets to his feet is the top man must make an attempt to return the bottom man to the mat, release him or be called for stalling, it always seemed utterly stupid to have a singular exception for having the legs in.
 
No. The ref warned and then penalized Zain as it was. Zain wrestled within the rules, Haggerty did not have a good match.
If the rules last year had already been changed to what they read this year my guess is Zain would have made the necessary adjustments.
In case you are wondering I thought the way the rule had been written was horsepuky. If the rule for every other situation of bottom wrestler gets to his feet is the top man must make an attempt to return the bottom man to the mat, release him or be called for stalling, it always seemed utterly stupid to have a singular exception for having the legs in.
Great stuff.
 
No. The ref warned and then penalized Zain as it was. Zain wrestled within the rules, Haggerty did not have a good match.
If the rules last year had already been changed to what they read this year my guess is Zain would have made the necessary adjustments.
In case you are wondering I thought the way the rule had been written was horsepuky. If the rule for every other situation of bottom wrestler gets to his feet is the top man must make an attempt to return the bottom man to the mat, release him or be called for stalling, it always seemed utterly stupid to have a singular exception for having the legs in.
Where were you in January? I could have used your like. I'm saving them up for a trip to Europe. They can be converted to airline miles, right?

https://iowa.forums.rivals.com/threads/i-dont-like-this-rule.177833/#post-4024579

By the way, thanks to who ever sent that thread over to the rules comity. I'm sure that's what lead to the new rule.;)
 
No. The ref warned and then penalized Zain as it was. Zain wrestled within the rules, Haggerty did not have a good match.
If the rules last year had already been changed to what they read this year my guess is Zain would have made the necessary adjustments.
In case you are wondering I thought the way the rule had been written was horsepuky. If the rule for every other situation of bottom wrestler gets to his feet is the top man must make an attempt to return the bottom man to the mat, release him or be called for stalling, it always seemed utterly stupid to have a singular exception for having the legs in.

Remember Zain's finals match 2 years ago vs Sorensen? When every single time Sorensen got to his feet from the bottom position, Zain ran him out of bounds from the center of the mat?

Is that "wrestling within the rules"? Zain is a monster on top, but he's also a master at stalling and getting away with it.
 
Remember Zain's finals match 2 years ago vs Sorensen? When every single time Sorensen got to his feet from the bottom position, Zain ran him out of bounds from the center of the mat?

Is that "wrestling within the rules"? Zain is a monster on top, but he's also a master at stalling and getting away with it.
I do not recall Zain running Brandon to the edge. I do recall Brandon getting to his feet with Zain having the legs in and stalemates being called. Probably happened 3 maybe 4 times. I also recall Zain getting all the takedowns, all the backpoints. I think Zain scored all of the offensive points in that match.
I understand the heeee's staaaaaling thing, but come on. If one kid scores all of the offensive points and wins by major decision is this really where you want to argue that kid is the one stalling?
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT