ADVERTISEMENT

Iowa wages: We were better off 10 years ago

cigaretteman

HB King
May 29, 2001
79,433
62,536
113
Steve Beck went nearly six years without a raise.

The 55-year-old factory worker in Fort Dodge used to routinely get pay bumps in his previous job at an office supply company. But then the owners retired and closed the business.

In his current manufacturing job, Beck until recently hadn't seen his $10-an-hour pay increase since he first started there almost six years ago, even while his costs have grown.

“Things are going up — groceries, everything is going up, up, up,” he said.

It's a familiar lament for many workers, both in Iowa and across the U.S., who have seen their earning power suffer as their costs rise faster than their wages. And it's been a rallying cry on the campaign trail for the Democratic presidential candidates who will debate at Drake University Saturday night.

How bad is it? After adjusting for inflation, an Iowan who earned the state’s median wage of $15.98 per hour last year had $1,200 less to spend than he or she would have a decade earlier.

All three major Democratic candidates have called for raising the minimum wage as one way to address the issue, while Republicans have emphasized lower taxes and less regulation.

Candidates in both parties almost universally agree that wage earners aren't sharing in America's economic recovery.

Numbers back that up.

In 1979, a typical Iowan wage earner working 40 hours a week would have earned $32,385 (in inflation-adjusted 2014 dollars).

By 2014, that worker's salary had inched up to $33,238 — a gain of just $850 over 35 years.

“It’s pretty stark,” said Colin Gordon, a University of Iowa researcher and professor. “It’s not as if people are just not getting wage increases. What makes it stark is that the cost of things — particularly big-budget items like childcare, health care and higher education — has risen dramatically over the same period of time.”

Those wage troubles come even as productivity rates for Iowa companies have reached 35-year highs, according to data from the Bureau of Economic Analysis.

“One thing you have to remember about that flat line at the median wage is that workers in 2015, especially in Iowa, are older, better educated and better trained than workers were in 1979,” Gordon said.

Sluggish wages are particularly hard on the lowest earners, said Charles Bruner, executive director of the Child and Family Policy Center, a children’s issues advocacy group.

“If there’s wage stagnation for people making $80,000 a year even for three or four years, they’re still getting by,” he said. “If there’s wage stagnation for somebody making $25,000 with a young child, that really creates challenges as far as the family holding it together.”

Beck finally saw a raise at his current job. After an extended back-and-forth with the the factory and the staffing company that employs him, he received $2 more an hour.

It's a big jump, but he said that money should have been given to him in increments over the last few years, rather than one lump sum.

Wider income gaps
Languishing wages have fueled widening income inequality across the United States over time, said Lawrence Mishel, president of the union Economic Policy Institute, a national think tank that receives some funding from labor unions.

Between 2013 and 2014, national wages fell at nearly all income levels, EPI research shows. And real hourly wages for those with college degrees fell almost 6 percent between 2007 and 2014, the group's data show.

“The way wage stagnation takes place is that people start out lower in their first jobs, and they have less of an increase as they gain more experience,” he said. “You yourself will experience more wages over time. But when you turn 45, you will have lower wages than someone who turned 45 20 years ago.”

Though he has researched this issue his entire career, Mishel said it seems to finally be gaining national attention, evidenced by recent presidential debates.

Years of small or nonexistent wages leave workers feeling "like it's tougher today," said Steve Vonk, who represents workers at the Des Moines Bridgestone tire plant as president of the United Steelworkers Local 310L.

The plant's workers received pay raises in 2013 after going 11 years without a bump, Vonk said. Jobs there start at about $16.50 per hour.

Vonk said workers at Bridgestone experience ups and downs on their contracts, depending on the state of the agricultural economy. What once was considered great health care is getting shaved off each year with a 10 percent increase in premiums.

Then in September, the company announced it would cut Sunday shifts from the middle of September through the year’s end. That move meant employees would on average lose 14 percent of their wages, Vonk said.

“I think the people out here are like the people everywhere," he said. "It’s harder to get ahead nowadays.”

What's to blame?
Many experts attribute the broader problem of wage stagnation on the diminished role of labor unions and collective bargaining rights, as well as minimum wages that have failed to keep up with inflation.

Conservatives generally point to lackluster growth in the overall economy, and blame that on high taxes and too much government regulation. Also playing roles: increased automation, competition from immigrant workers and movement of jobs to lower-wage countries.

Mishel cites other factors: the loss of overtime rights, the exploitation of undocumented workers and the reclassification of workers as contractors who aren't eligible for benefits and other employee perks.

And there’s a conscious choice by employers to hold on to more profits, rather than share them with employees, he said.

As evidence, he pointed to data that show American business are topping record productivity levels.

“It tells me the fact that wages have been relatively stagnant is not because we have not been producing substantially more goods and services,” he said. “It’s not because somehow the economy is not producing.”

Some relief ahead?
There's some hope that falling unemployment may be one remedy to stagnant wages.

When employees have more job options, and the search for workers becomes more competitive, wages tend to go up.

There's evidence of that in the Des Moines metro, where the unemployment rate fell to 3.6 percent in September.

Research from staffing company Robert Half shows 2016 raises are in store for many employers in Des Moines, spanning jobs in IT, accounting, financial services and office administration.

The Palmer Group, another staffing company, released a survey of 200 central Iowa employers earlier this month that also predicted widespread raises for most workers.

“Across the board, we’re seeing an increase, yes,” said the company’s regional vice president Mike Gremmer. “Now, whether it’s keeping up with inflation, I don’t know."

Fear of being ‘stuck’
In today’s workplace, doing your job well doesn’t necessarily translate into raises; it often takes making job changes to get ahead, workers told the Register.

After graduating from college, Charmaine Bell, 25, was surprised by the relatively low pay she saw advertised in job listings – nothing like the “fantasyland” she had envisioned for her professional future.

Bell, who has a degree in business administration, started out at Wells Fargo in downtown Des Moines two years ago at about $13 an hour. On that wage, she was living paycheck to paycheck and struggling to care for her young son.

She’s since received substantial pay hikes, but only after hopping around to different positions and departments, she said.

Things are much better now, she said, including having her own place. But at her current wage, she said she can’t afford to purchase a home.

And there’s always a fear of getting stuck at a wage for a long period.

“If you never get that promotion that you’re looking for, if you never are able to move up, you can be stuck,” she said.

http://www.press-citizen.com/story/...ges-we-were-better-off-10-years-ago/75462110/
 
  • Like
Reactions: moral_victory
Steve Beck went nearly six years without a raise.

The 55-year-old factory worker in Fort Dodge used to routinely get pay bumps in his previous job at an office supply company. But then the owners retired and closed the business.

In his current manufacturing job, Beck until recently hadn't seen his $10-an-hour pay increase since he first started there almost six years ago, even while his costs have grown.

“Things are going up — groceries, everything is going up, up, up,” he said.

It's a familiar lament for many workers, both in Iowa and across the U.S., who have seen their earning power suffer as their costs rise faster than their wages. And it's been a rallying cry on the campaign trail for the Democratic presidential candidates who will debate at Drake University Saturday night.

How bad is it? After adjusting for inflation, an Iowan who earned the state’s median wage of $15.98 per hour last year had $1,200 less to spend than he or she would have a decade earlier.

All three major Democratic candidates have called for raising the minimum wage as one way to address the issue, while Republicans have emphasized lower taxes and less regulation.

Candidates in both parties almost universally agree that wage earners aren't sharing in America's economic recovery.

Numbers back that up.

In 1979, a typical Iowan wage earner working 40 hours a week would have earned $32,385 (in inflation-adjusted 2014 dollars).

By 2014, that worker's salary had inched up to $33,238 — a gain of just $850 over 35 years.

“It’s pretty stark,” said Colin Gordon, a University of Iowa researcher and professor. “It’s not as if people are just not getting wage increases. What makes it stark is that the cost of things — particularly big-budget items like childcare, health care and higher education — has risen dramatically over the same period of time.”

Those wage troubles come even as productivity rates for Iowa companies have reached 35-year highs, according to data from the Bureau of Economic Analysis.

“One thing you have to remember about that flat line at the median wage is that workers in 2015, especially in Iowa, are older, better educated and better trained than workers were in 1979,” Gordon said.

Sluggish wages are particularly hard on the lowest earners, said Charles Bruner, executive director of the Child and Family Policy Center, a children’s issues advocacy group.

“If there’s wage stagnation for people making $80,000 a year even for three or four years, they’re still getting by,” he said. “If there’s wage stagnation for somebody making $25,000 with a young child, that really creates challenges as far as the family holding it together.”

Beck finally saw a raise at his current job. After an extended back-and-forth with the the factory and the staffing company that employs him, he received $2 more an hour.

It's a big jump, but he said that money should have been given to him in increments over the last few years, rather than one lump sum.

Wider income gaps
Languishing wages have fueled widening income inequality across the United States over time, said Lawrence Mishel, president of the union Economic Policy Institute, a national think tank that receives some funding from labor unions.

Between 2013 and 2014, national wages fell at nearly all income levels, EPI research shows. And real hourly wages for those with college degrees fell almost 6 percent between 2007 and 2014, the group's data show.

“The way wage stagnation takes place is that people start out lower in their first jobs, and they have less of an increase as they gain more experience,” he said. “You yourself will experience more wages over time. But when you turn 45, you will have lower wages than someone who turned 45 20 years ago.”

Though he has researched this issue his entire career, Mishel said it seems to finally be gaining national attention, evidenced by recent presidential debates.

Years of small or nonexistent wages leave workers feeling "like it's tougher today," said Steve Vonk, who represents workers at the Des Moines Bridgestone tire plant as president of the United Steelworkers Local 310L.

The plant's workers received pay raises in 2013 after going 11 years without a bump, Vonk said. Jobs there start at about $16.50 per hour.

Vonk said workers at Bridgestone experience ups and downs on their contracts, depending on the state of the agricultural economy. What once was considered great health care is getting shaved off each year with a 10 percent increase in premiums.

Then in September, the company announced it would cut Sunday shifts from the middle of September through the year’s end. That move meant employees would on average lose 14 percent of their wages, Vonk said.

“I think the people out here are like the people everywhere," he said. "It’s harder to get ahead nowadays.”

What's to blame?
Many experts attribute the broader problem of wage stagnation on the diminished role of labor unions and collective bargaining rights, as well as minimum wages that have failed to keep up with inflation.

Conservatives generally point to lackluster growth in the overall economy, and blame that on high taxes and too much government regulation. Also playing roles: increased automation, competition from immigrant workers and movement of jobs to lower-wage countries.

Mishel cites other factors: the loss of overtime rights, the exploitation of undocumented workers and the reclassification of workers as contractors who aren't eligible for benefits and other employee perks.

And there’s a conscious choice by employers to hold on to more profits, rather than share them with employees, he said.

As evidence, he pointed to data that show American business are topping record productivity levels.

“It tells me the fact that wages have been relatively stagnant is not because we have not been producing substantially more goods and services,” he said. “It’s not because somehow the economy is not producing.”

Some relief ahead?
There's some hope that falling unemployment may be one remedy to stagnant wages.

When employees have more job options, and the search for workers becomes more competitive, wages tend to go up.

There's evidence of that in the Des Moines metro, where the unemployment rate fell to 3.6 percent in September.

Research from staffing company Robert Half shows 2016 raises are in store for many employers in Des Moines, spanning jobs in IT, accounting, financial services and office administration.

The Palmer Group, another staffing company, released a survey of 200 central Iowa employers earlier this month that also predicted widespread raises for most workers.

“Across the board, we’re seeing an increase, yes,” said the company’s regional vice president Mike Gremmer. “Now, whether it’s keeping up with inflation, I don’t know."

Fear of being ‘stuck’
In today’s workplace, doing your job well doesn’t necessarily translate into raises; it often takes making job changes to get ahead, workers told the Register.

After graduating from college, Charmaine Bell, 25, was surprised by the relatively low pay she saw advertised in job listings – nothing like the “fantasyland” she had envisioned for her professional future.

Bell, who has a degree in business administration, started out at Wells Fargo in downtown Des Moines two years ago at about $13 an hour. On that wage, she was living paycheck to paycheck and struggling to care for her young son.

She’s since received substantial pay hikes, but only after hopping around to different positions and departments, she said.

Things are much better now, she said, including having her own place. But at her current wage, she said she can’t afford to purchase a home.

And there’s always a fear of getting stuck at a wage for a long period.

“If you never get that promotion that you’re looking for, if you never are able to move up, you can be stuck,” she said.

http://www.press-citizen.com/story/...ges-we-were-better-off-10-years-ago/75462110/


Has good ol' Steve ever thought that maybe he should make his own raise and apply for jobs that will pay more? If his employer doesn't give raises, why does he stay there? And if Steve won't quit, how does that motivate his employer to raise wages?
 
Doesn't say anything about the increase in health insurance. Is that considered part of the wage?? Maybe we need to look at trying to limit the pool of workers and that would drive wages up as well. However, then the dems would lose a whole block of voters they were counting on and big business would lose it's cheap labor.

I also feel sorry for the people who only get 29 hours. Lots of businesses that have cut back folks to 29 hours a week for some reason.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HallofFame
I read this too ciggy. In fact Trad and I were discussing this on here yesterday. It's a very well written article. It kind of reinforces what I experienced in the workforce....back in the day when I had to work!;)
THGe wage earner today has it much worse than the wage earner of my generation. Pay grades are lower initially, pay raises are less and less frequent from 30 years ago and the demise of collective bargaining, the rise of "temp" employment agencies and the use of (illegal) foreign workers have combined to severely depress any upward movement of wages. The figures in the article are stark. Wages are stale (adjusted for inflation) but the cost of living continues to skyrocket...the costs of healthcare, child care were barely calculable when I was 30 years old...they are HUGE concerns for most household budgets today.
I would challange any "con" on this board to read this article and dismiss it, The one reason I like Bernie (and the only reason Bernie is the ONLY alternative in this field of 18) is because he has identified this as the reason he wants to be POTUS.
Bernie is the only alternative...and he alone cannot get anything done. Meanwhile, "we the people" will get more of the same and we will be told to collectively bow down and kiss "the job creator's" arse.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cigaretteman
Branstad has been cutting regulations for years now, I thought that was supposed to raise wages? Looks like big corporations would rather just pocket their profits instead of rewarding their employees.

Yes, who wants profits for having a vision and turning it into a reality, all while others benefit along the way? What's sad is those that have the least stress and expectations want to have the life that those who sacrifice, struggle and overcome have. Nature doesn't work that way, so guys like the one in the story should just deal with it.
 
I read this too ciggy. In fact Trad and I were discussing this on here yesterday. It's a very well written article. It kind of reinforces what I experienced in the workforce....back in the day when I had to work!;)
THGe wage earner today has it much worse than the wage earner of my generation. Pay grades are lower initially, pay raises are less and less frequent from 30 years ago and the demise of collective bargaining, the rise of "temp" employment agencies and the use of (illegal) foreign workers have combined to severely depress any upward movement of wages. The figures in the article are stark. Wages are stale (adjusted for inflation) but the cost of living continues to skyrocket...the costs of healthcare, child care were barely calculable when I was 30 years old...they are HUGE concerns for most household budgets today.
I would challange any "con" on this board to read this article and dismiss it, The one reason I like Bernie (and the only reason Bernie is the ONLY alternative in this field of 18) is because he has identified this as the reason he wants to be POTUS.
Bernie is the only alternative...and he alone cannot get anything done. Meanwhile, "we the people" will get more of the same and we will be told to collectively bow down and kiss "the job creator's" arse.


I've ready your borderline lunatic posts, but this last line is great. Aren't you the one that's retired and living off the hard work of these job creators? I think it's in your best interest to be thankful to those that help keep this country running.
 
I've ready your borderline lunatic posts, but this last line is great. Aren't you the one that's retired and living off the hard work of these job creators? I think it's in your best interest to be thankful to those that help keep this country running.

I was lucky. I PLANNED for my retirement for 35+ years...It worked out for me. If I was starting work today under similar circumstances Mich, I don't think I could do it. Just sayin'....when I started 3-8% pay bumps annually quite common and "bonuses" occurred not infrequently......The last 15 years of work, increases were 1to 21/2% and bonuses were awarded only if the budget was NOT properly planned.
The modern "wage earner" has it much tougher than I did for a majority of my career.....and I owe it all to those "job creators."
I did have a small pension (employer funded) when I started but that was discontinued about halfway though my work...the vast majority of "my fortune" was MY money invested in 403b's, 401k's and Roths......where there might have been a 2-3% employer match.
AS far as me "keeping the country running"...partner, I have already hauled that water...it is your turn now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cigaretteman
I'm making less than I did almost 20 years ago in the tech world, but I was surprised when I renewed my unemployment claims between one of the many contract jobs I've had to take since this industry has moved to those kind of jobs as "placeholders" before H-1B quotas are basically probably eliminated if TPP gets passed, or congress passes increasing the quota for them.

Oregon's Imatchskills program you need to sign up for as part of getting unemployment has you categorize what you do from a list of professions and in my case I selected "Web Developer". Now this obviously doesn't factor in experience, and the variability of what kind of jobs a web developer can vary a lot between those doing very sophisticated Javascript web frameworks with back end work as well, and those who are just doing some editing HTML web pages online someplace. They noted that the mean salary for this job category was $31k, and that if a company offered that for a job to me, I'd have to take that salary job by the rules or risk losing unemployment. $31k is less than I had as a starting salary when I first got in to the tech world on the west coast coming out of school here at Iowa way back in the 80's.

So, the barriers for people making what they used to make in earlier times are very real these days!
 
  • Like
Reactions: cigaretteman
Branstad has been cutting regulations for years now, I thought that was supposed to raise wages? Looks like big corporations would rather just pocket their profits instead of rewarding their employees.

I work for a large Iowa-based corporation.

We've steadily enjoyed merit increases, profit sharing and bonuses without fail for the last ten years.

Thanks Terry!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 86Hawkeye
Doesn't say anything about the increase in health insurance. Is that considered part of the wage?? Maybe we need to look at trying to limit the pool of workers and that would drive wages up as well. However, then the dems would lose a whole block of voters they were counting on and big business would lose it's cheap labor.

I also feel sorry for the people who only get 29 hours. Lots of businesses that have cut back folks to 29 hours a week for some reason.

I wonder why that is?:)
 
I'm making less than I did almost 20 years ago in the tech world, but I was surprised when I renewed my unemployment claims between one of the many contract jobs I've had to take since this industry has moved to those kind of jobs as "placeholders" before H-1B quotas are basically probably eliminated if TPP gets passed, or congress passes increasing the quota for them.

Oregon's Imatchskills program you need to sign up for as part of getting unemployment has you categorize what you do from a list of professions and in my case I selected "Web Developer". Now this obviously doesn't factor in experience, and the variability of what kind of jobs a web developer can vary a lot between those doing very sophisticated Javascript web frameworks with back end work as well, and those who are just doing some editing HTML web pages online someplace. They noted that the mean salary for this job category was $31k, and that if a company offered that for a job to me, I'd have to take that salary job by the rules or risk losing unemployment. $31k is less than I had as a starting salary when I first got in to the tech world on the west coast coming out of school here at Iowa way back in the 80's.

So, the barriers for people making what they used to make in earlier times are very real these days!

You have given ample reasons as to why you should explore a different line of work, or a different industry altogether.
 
You have given ample reasons as to why you should explore a different line of work, or a different industry altogether.

That's not very practical when you are only a few years away from retirement age. I like the work I do in this field, and there's no reason why I shouldn't get a decent salary in it. As I noted, companies have been doing a lot of outsourcing in this field and "insourcing" with programs like H-1B, that might get expanded when some of these newer trade deals are passed.

If I tried to do a different field altogether, there's no way I'd make the same kind of money, and only for a few years. These problems exist in many areas and there aren't many professions that are immune to them. Radiologists also are outsourced as well in the health profession. Not everyone should or can work for Wall Street or selling real estate, even if professions like that are being pushed as ones making more money these days by a government beholden to Wall Street, etc. The rules of a global economy can and should be changed, so that the only country not in effect doing tariffs through things like VAT taxes, etc. is our country and our working people pay the price for that "race to the bottom".
 
That's not very practical when you are only a few years away from retirement age. I like the work I do in this field, and there's no reason why I shouldn't get a decent salary in it. As I noted, companies have been doing a lot of outsourcing in this field and "insourcing" with programs like H-1B, that might get expanded when some of these newer trade deals are passed.

If I tried to do a different field altogether, there's no way I'd make the same kind of money, and only for a few years. These problems exist in many areas and there aren't many professions that are immune to them. Radiologists also are outsourced as well in the health profession. Not everyone should or can work for Wall Street or selling real estate, even if professions like that are being pushed as ones making more money these days by a government beholden to Wall Street, etc. The rules of a global economy can and should be changed, so that the only country not in effect doing tariffs through things like VAT taxes, etc. is our country and our working people pay the price for that "race to the bottom".

Is there still a need for the service you provide?

If there is then as an IC you need to figure out why the market is deselecting you.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT