I think individual sites determine the cut off. As we know a 5.7 in rivals is a 3 star but 5.8 is a 4 star. A 6.0 is also a 4 star but 6.1 a 5 star.What you seem to be stating is an avg star rating (1 - 5) vs my avg position rank (1 - 400).
Example:
Player 1 Stars: 4 + 5 + 5 + 4 + 4 = 4.4 avg (is this considered a composite 4-star?)
Player 2 Stars: 4 + 5 + 5 + 4 + 5 = 4.6 avg (is this considered a composite 5-star?)
Wonder where the line is drawn between a composite 4-star and composite 5-star?
Is it 4.5 or greater for a composite 5-star? Is it anything over 4 a for composite 5-star?
Don't know if I like this as I like to know their avg position rank.
Was hoping it was based on avg position rank where anything over top 15 avg, top 20 avg or even top 25 avg are considered composite 5-stars.
Anyways, thanks for your reply.
I attached an article that give a simple explanation of their ranking system. Also, below is the composite for 247.
This probably is not what you are looking for, but I do understand what you are saying.
https://www.cougcenter.com/wsu-foot...n-247-star-rating-system-national-signing-day
For example, 247:
"The 247 Composite Rating is a proprietary algorithm that compiles prospect "rankings" and "ratings" listed in the public domain by the major media recruiting services. It converts average industry ranks and ratings into a linear composite index capping at 1.0000, which indicates a consensus No. 1 prospect across all services."