Originally posted by shobart:
Originally posted by artradley:
The main areas are stalling on your feet and stalling on top, which I believe are separate issues and should be dealt with separately.
On Feet
Push out rule. I don't like the subjectivity that sometimes comes into play, but the current system is failing and the increased action/scoring would be worth the risk.
On Top
Forget stall warnings, but based on the definitions that are already in the book (parallel, repeatedly dropping to a leg, etc) when the referee identifies that the top wrestler is stalling simply blow it dead, award the bottom wrestler an escape, and stand them up. I think this would make it easier for refs to make that call, and so they would do it more often.
I wish they would just flat out get rid of the riding time point. This is just my simple, and humble, opinion, but it seems to me for every wrestler that is actually "working for something" on top, there are at least 20 others doing a stall ride with hopes of just getting to the minute mark for that one point. We see the riding time point play a role in determining a lot of winners these days, particularly when you are looking at two top tier guys who are very evenly matched on their feet. Yes, eliminating the riding time point doesn't prevent stalling on the bottom per se, but I think it would help to a certain degree,.
Part of it is a mind set as well to a certain extent. I think a ref could be more inclined to call stalling for a guy on top who's just going to rid paralell versus the guy who's truly working to score from top, even if the guy who is working to score isn't necessarily "getting anywhere". Right now, I see a lot of stall rides not being treated any differently than a guy who is riding and working to score. Plus, I think shifts a wrestler's focus a bit when they understand that there are no points awarded for riding time.
Only thing about the push out rule that could be an issue (to me anyway) is if a guy is just bulldogging a kid out of bounds, without changing levels and/or really working for a shot, wouldn't that be one point? I see that from time to time, where maybe a coach is yelling for stalling, but his kid is only pushing the other kid out of bounds. It just seems to me that rule could get a little fuzzy.
Obviously, everything is subjective, and there isn't really a 100% cure to this, but I would like to see some approach to change. Actually would be nice to see coaches to start pushing for changes as obviously, that could help. Outside of watching Logan (unfortunately against Jeva) and Martinez-Ness, the finals yesterday we mind blowingly boring to watch.
Not sure what others think as there's a lot of discussion around this from time to time, but man, I wish the powers that be could take hold of this and run with it to make/force some changes.