ADVERTISEMENT

Ironside comments on stalling

Originally posted by northernboarderhawk:

Originally posted by blak&gold:
Personally, I think the officials have to be forced to make calls.

If the score is 0-0 at 1:00, one or both need to be cautioned.
If the score is 0-0 at 2:00, one or both need to be cautioned.

2nd period

If a wrestler chooses top or bottom, they get 1:00 minute to score, if that does not happen they are brought to their feet.
At 1:40 of the period if there has still been no scoring in the period, one or both need to be cautioned.

3rd period

If a wrestler chooses top or bottom, they get 1:00 minute to score, if that does not happen they are brought to their feet.
At 1:40 of the period if there has still been no scoring in the period, one or both need to be cautioned.

Every period is forced to have a point scored or a stalling call (two in first).

OT

Same as current except, if it goes to the final OT instead of riding time difference official decides winner.

Make officials know that they need to impact match. If they don't do it early then they have to decide the winner which they probably don't want to.

MMA does pretty well at getting aggressive competitions, they have to impress judges. If I am a wrestler and I think the official might make the call, I will be forced to be aggressive.
I like what you are thinking as far as calling stalling with 0-0 scores, also know your ideas are just examples but I do not like the idea on putting time constraints on when to call it. I personal would just like to see it called like it was in the 80's early 90's. Pretty much every match had a stall called on one if not both wrestlers if there wasn't any scoring late 1st. period, then they didn't wait until the next period was over before they would call it again if there was still no activity. The parallel body ride, riding behind the arms, they would call this quit regularly and early if the top guy wasn't at least getting off to the side and trying to turn his opponent . I always loved it when Gable would stand at the edge of the mat and holler that guy is stalling that's one, and it was his own wrestler that he wanted the stalling called on. I really think it would help the sport a lot if coach's would do this today. As I already know this isn't going to happen because the coach's also know that with the way the officials call it by todays standard it may help their guy get that exiting 2-1 win. As many others have already pointed out the 5 count is one of the worst things that they have done to the sport. It just lets the official of the hook for actually doing his job in the match. Not all officials start the count at the same time, not all of them count at the same pace. What should be a 5 count for some, actually turns into about a count of 7 to 8 or even worse. Officials need to be held accountable, and even suspended for lack of doing what they are getting paid to do. I realize everything is subjective and could be hard to get done, but it can be done. Somebody has got to grow a pair and start to enforce the rules.
The whole point of putting restraints on calls is because officials are not going to grow a pair. In essence it is forcing them to have a pair whether they like it or not. I am assuming that is why they went to the counts because officials would not call it stalling without counts.
 
As I glanced over the various posts which include rule book explanations of stalling as writen, it is quite obvious why so many fans and wannabe fans would be going crazy. stalling is quite well discribed and adressed in the rule book privious to the many recent tweaks. WHY IS IT SO HARD TO ENFORCE??? It is as many have suggested up to the people in stripes to give our sports the the "kick start" that is needed. Until the rule is enforced wrestling will suffer plain and simple.

The tweaks that have come into being have done little more than lead to confusion. In addition to the rediculous count to five to determine if an ankle rider is stalling, the confusion on fleeing the mat makes it literally imposible to defend an attack as one would do in the center of the mat. And talk about confusion..... one of the top officials in the country and one who participated with his father in a video to explain the rule blows it in the Minny/PSU dual.
This post was edited on 3/9 9:55 PM by BDB57
 
Originally posted by Auger:
I live out West where wrestling fans only exist in small pockets. It has been really hard to grow the sport partially due to stalling. Yesterday I was at a bar watching the tourney with two buddies who have partial interest in wrestling and they were both turned away because of the stalling. One friend even stated that he thought wrestlers were tough and didn't understand the cowardly actions of back stepping after having the lead. I couldn't argue with him. When half the match is two guys slapping at each other and the other half is one guy back stepping it doesn't make for great TV sports watching to casual fans. Wrestling has been a very important sport for my family so it is hard to see it viewed so harshly by other sport fans but I can't blame them after watching yesterday's championship.
Totally agree and there's no way our sport is going to grow and grab casual fans with the product we're putting on the mat now. I'm as big as a fan as there is and it's sometimes painful for me to watch. I feel like they should just start the matches in overtime and save us all the hand fighting, boundary dancing, and fleeing out of bounds. It really is comical sometimes, the only thing I wish I could figure out is if I should be blaming the wrestlers or the officials.
As far as rules, we have to keep in consideration that they need to be "clean" and "clear cut"...easy for the new or casual fan to understand.
One things for sure, it really would be an easy fix if officials would just call the stuff the way it needed to be called. Hell I'd love officials to be overzealous with the stall calls and "fleeing/avoiding" calls than the way it's being called now. Everyone of them just swallows the whistle.
I wonder how many stalling points were actually called this weekend...not warnings but stalling points actually awarded.
 
Originally posted by shobart:
Originally posted by artradley:
The main areas are stalling on your feet and stalling on top, which I believe are separate issues and should be dealt with separately.

On Feet
Push out rule. I don't like the subjectivity that sometimes comes into play, but the current system is failing and the increased action/scoring would be worth the risk.

On Top
Forget stall warnings, but based on the definitions that are already in the book (parallel, repeatedly dropping to a leg, etc) when the referee identifies that the top wrestler is stalling simply blow it dead, award the bottom wrestler an escape, and stand them up. I think this would make it easier for refs to make that call, and so they would do it more often.
I wish they would just flat out get rid of the riding time point. This is just my simple, and humble, opinion, but it seems to me for every wrestler that is actually "working for something" on top, there are at least 20 others doing a stall ride with hopes of just getting to the minute mark for that one point. We see the riding time point play a role in determining a lot of winners these days, particularly when you are looking at two top tier guys who are very evenly matched on their feet. Yes, eliminating the riding time point doesn't prevent stalling on the bottom per se, but I think it would help to a certain degree,.

Part of it is a mind set as well to a certain extent. I think a ref could be more inclined to call stalling for a guy on top who's just going to rid paralell versus the guy who's truly working to score from top, even if the guy who is working to score isn't necessarily "getting anywhere". Right now, I see a lot of stall rides not being treated any differently than a guy who is riding and working to score. Plus, I think shifts a wrestler's focus a bit when they understand that there are no points awarded for riding time.

Only thing about the push out rule that could be an issue (to me anyway) is if a guy is just bulldogging a kid out of bounds, without changing levels and/or really working for a shot, wouldn't that be one point? I see that from time to time, where maybe a coach is yelling for stalling, but his kid is only pushing the other kid out of bounds. It just seems to me that rule could get a little fuzzy.

Obviously, everything is subjective, and there isn't really a 100% cure to this, but I would like to see some approach to change. Actually would be nice to see coaches to start pushing for changes as obviously, that could help. Outside of watching Logan (unfortunately against Jeva) and Martinez-Ness, the finals yesterday we mind blowingly boring to watch.

Not sure what others think as there's a lot of discussion around this from time to time, but man, I wish the powers that be could take hold of this and run with it to make/force some changes.
Agree with your overall premise, but I thought a couple of other matches were fairly entertaining, though not high scoring. There was quite a bit of good action at 133 with Dardanes and Taylor, and lo and behold, Taylor actually TRIED to score on a desperation move with less than 10 seconds left while TRAILING! Who'd have ever thunk that was something you could do! LOL!

I thought 165 and 174 were fairly entertaining matches as well.

At 149, when Tsirtsis was on top, he didn't even bother to try and move off of Sorensen's back when he broke him down. He just wanted whatever seconds of riding time he could get away with while completely laying directly on top of him. He didn't care in the least. HWT.'s don't even bother with that crap very often. Ridiculous. And I don't like it any better when Iowa guys do similar things (I don't think I've seen any of our guys this year quite as bad as what Tsirtsis was doing however). Zero attempt to get off to the side, at least fake it for God's sake.
 
Originally posted by MVPFAN:
Here are the rules and if the gutless refs actually followed them like they are supposed to things would be fine. Someones ass needs to be on the line! In no other sport do they not enforce the rules. I agree with the poster who said the 5 count sucks, it has created more stalling because before a ref could hit a guy anytime he felt they needed it and now they just stall their asses off and know full well they won't get called because they can hear the count. They just move up for a second and the count starts over, it is a friggin joke. Meanwhile they have totally forgot about calling all the other stalling listed below that has nothing to do with a count. If they see stalling then call it, screw the counting crap! Call it like you are supposed to and how the rules say and people will adjust and quick. Take all the damn refs and have off season training watching all these bullshit matches and instruct them about all the places they should be calling stalling. Refs who don't follow the book can be let go.

I do like the push out if they are going to continue to not do their jobs. I do worry about it leading to teams getting a bunch of meat heads to win matches just by pushing people and it would really get boring. I'd maybe have it be a point if they step out on their own or to avoid a shot or wrestling hold like underhooks etc. If they do a push out they still need to call stalling if a guy runs all over inside the circle avoiding action. I guess people will learn to stay away from the edge either way.

I like getting rid of riding time for sure, the sooner the better.

I also like an action clock and if on the mat no one can get a turn or escape in 30 seconds then put them back up. If you get backs you can get another 30 seconds to work.




5.9 Stalling


5.9.1 Initiating Action. Action is to be maintained throughout the match by the contestants staying near the center of the mat and wrestling aggressively in all positions (top, bottom or neutral). Stalling is defined as one or both wrestlers attempting to avoid wrestling action as an offensive or defensive strategy. When a referee recognizes stalling, the first violation will be a warning; the second violation will result in 1 point being awarded to the opponent; the third violation is 1 point being awarded to the opponent; the fourth violation is 1 point being awarded to the opponent; and the fifth violation will result in a disqualification. A "double stalling" violation is given when both wrestlers fail to initiate an offense. (See Penalty Table for sequence of penalties.)


5.9.2 Neutral Position Stalling. Each wrestler must attempt to work toward the center of the mat and continue wrestling in an attempt to secure a takedown, RULE 5 / INFRACTIONS WR-57 regardless of the time or score of the match. Stalling in the neutral position is defined as follows: [/B]


5.9.2.1 Continually backing away from the opponent without creating offensive action. This happens all the time.[/B]


5.9.2.2 Near the edge of the wrestling area, a wrestler shall not leave the wrestling area unless it is to sprawl from an opponent's takedown attempt or when interlocked in wrestling. Over and over with this one[/B]


5.9.2.3 A wrestler shall be called for stalling if kicking out from a lower leg hold when this action results in the defending wrestler going out of the wrestling area. Happens a lot, have not called it for 2 or 3 years[/B]


5.9.2.4 Fleeing or attempting to flee the wrestling area as a means of avoiding being scored upon. (See Rule 5.13.) Have not seen this called much if at all but happens a lot.[/B]


5.9.3 Stalling-Offensive and Defensive Position. Offensive and defensive wrestlers shall make an attempt to sustain active wrestling and remain in the center. The offensive and defensive stalling situations include:


5.9.3.1 The offensive wrestler does not aggressively attempt to break down the opponent. This is big time abused.[/B]


5.9.3.2 Either wrestler pushing or pulling the opponent out of bounds to prevent scoring. Big time abused, people are constantly pushing or pulling people OB to avoid an escape. This is even easy to call, should be automatic.


5.9.3.3 The offensive wrestler grasping the defensive wrestler's leg(s) with both hands or arms, unless such action is designed to break down the opponent for the purpose of securing a fall or to prevent an escape or reversal. Big time stall tactic.


5.9.3.4 Repeatedly grasping or interlocking hands around a leg without attempting an offensive move. Big time stall tactic.


5.9.3.5 The defensive wrestler must initiate action to escape or reverse the opponent. Done some but not as bad as top guy stalling.


5.9.3.6 Repeatedly applying the legs while in the rear-standing position is stalling. With the defensive wrestler in a standing position, the offensive wrestler is allowed reaction time to attempt to bring the opponent back to the mat. Waters


5.9.4 Stalling by Delaying Match. Delaying the match-such as straggling back from out of bounds or unnecessarily changing or adjusting equipment-shall be penalized as stalling. This crap is non stop, guys dinking around and slowly getting back to the center while the other guy and ref wait. If the ref and one guy are ready and waiting then nail em don't wait on em.

This post was edited on 3/9 3:24 PM by MVPFAN

This post was edited on 3/9 4:13 PM by MVPFAN
MVP, it is amazing to think back on the season and reflect on how many times I witnessed the things listed above. And there was absolutely no thought by the refs to call any of it. The wrestler would have been shocked to get many of these called on him at this point, because the refs have taught them they don't need to worry about it.

It's just sad.
 
That is the crazy thing - if us as wrestling fans are complaining about the product, how do we expect a casual fan to get interested. I used to try to explain to people about why they lock up, they are fighting for position, to feel an opening, etc.. Now I want to just tell them they are just trying not to get taken down. When you watch matches and a guy is leading by 1 with 30 or 40 seconds, you almost now it is over. One guy runs around, gets 1 stall call, but will never get a 2nd one to tie it up.

If you can't call 2 stall calls when a guy runs around the mat for 30 or 40 seconds, I don't know how we expect refs to call it at other times. I agree that if it is a scoreless 1st period, 3 full minutes of wrestling, at the least they should give a stall call to the least aggressive guy.
 
Originally posted by augiehawk:
That is the crazy thing - if us as wrestling fans are complaining about the product, how do we expect a casual fan to get interested. I used to try to explain to people about why they lock up, they are fighting for position, to feel an opening, etc.. Now I want to just tell them they are just trying not to get taken down. When you watch matches and a guy is leading by 1 with 30 or 40 seconds, you almost now it is over. One guy runs around, gets 1 stall call, but will never get a 2nd one to tie it up.

If you can't call 2 stall calls when a guy runs around the mat for 30 or 40 seconds, I don't know how we expect refs to call it at other times. I agree that if it is a scoreless 1st period, 3 full minutes of wrestling, at the least they should award a point to the most aggressive guy.
FIFY

But that would only change how the first 3 minutes are wrestled. Officials still need to promote activity the rest of the way. Laying on the opponent like Tsirtsis did or grabbing the mat to get out of bounds like Evans did should be penalized immediately.
 
Most refs don't want action in match. It makes their job a lot harder. Refs should read the damm rule book for stalling before each match. Maybe then it would sink in.
 
Originally posted by blak&gold:
Originally posted by northernboarderhawk:

Originally posted by blak&gold:
Personally, I think the officials have to be forced to make calls.

If the score is 0-0 at 1:00, one or both need to be cautioned.
If the score is 0-0 at 2:00, one or both need to be cautioned.

2nd period

If a wrestler chooses top or bottom, they get 1:00 minute to score, if that does not happen they are brought to their feet.
At 1:40 of the period if there has still been no scoring in the period, one or both need to be cautioned.

3rd period

If a wrestler chooses top or bottom, they get 1:00 minute to score, if that does not happen they are brought to their feet.
At 1:40 of the period if there has still been no scoring in the period, one or both need to be cautioned.

Every period is forced to have a point scored or a stalling call (two in first).

OT

Same as current except, if it goes to the final OT instead of riding time difference official decides winner.

Make officials know that they need to impact match. If they don't do it early then they have to decide the winner which they probably don't want to.

MMA does pretty well at getting aggressive competitions, they have to impress judges. If I am a wrestler and I think the official might make the call, I will be forced to be aggressive.
I like what you are thinking as far as calling stalling with 0-0 scores, also know your ideas are just examples but I do not like the idea on putting time constraints on when to call it. I personal would just like to see it called like it was in the 80's early 90's. Pretty much every match had a stall called on one if not both wrestlers if there wasn't any scoring late 1st. period, then they didn't wait until the next period was over before they would call it again if there was still no activity. The parallel body ride, riding behind the arms, they would call this quit regularly and early if the top guy wasn't at least getting off to the side and trying to turn his opponent . I always loved it when Gable would stand at the edge of the mat and holler that guy is stalling that's one, and it was his own wrestler that he wanted the stalling called on. I really think it would help the sport a lot if coach's would do this today. As I already know this isn't going to happen because the coach's also know that with the way the officials call it by todays standard it may help their guy get that exiting 2-1 win. As many others have already pointed out the 5 count is one of the worst things that they have done to the sport. It just lets the official of the hook for actually doing his job in the match. Not all officials start the count at the same time, not all of them count at the same pace. What should be a 5 count for some, actually turns into about a count of 7 to 8 or even worse. Officials need to be held accountable, and even suspended for lack of doing what they are getting paid to do. I realize everything is subjective and could be hard to get done, but it can be done. Somebody has got to grow a pair and start to enforce the rules.
The whole point of putting restraints on calls is because officials are not going to grow a pair. In essence it is forcing them to have a pair whether they like it or not. I am assuming that is why they went to the counts because officials would not call it stalling without counts.
Right on. Get a set, CALL the STALL.
 
Originally posted by Shafthawk:
Originally posted by MVPFAN:
Here are the rules and if the gutless refs actually followed them like they are supposed to things would be fine. Someones ass needs to be on the line! In no other sport do they not enforce the rules. I agree with the poster who said the 5 count sucks, it has created more stalling because before a ref could hit a guy anytime he felt they needed it and now they just stall their asses off and know full well they won't get called because they can hear the count. They just move up for a second and the count starts over, it is a friggin joke. Meanwhile they have totally forgot about calling all the other stalling listed below that has nothing to do with a count. If they see stalling then call it, screw the counting crap! Call it like you are supposed to and how the rules say and people will adjust and quick. Take all the damn refs and have off season training watching all these bullshit matches and instruct them about all the places they should be calling stalling. Refs who don't follow the book can be let go.

I do like the push out if they are going to continue to not do their jobs. I do worry about it leading to teams getting a bunch of meat heads to win matches just by pushing people and it would really get boring. I'd maybe have it be a point if they step out on their own or to avoid a shot or wrestling hold like underhooks etc. If they do a push out they still need to call stalling if a guy runs all over inside the circle avoiding action. I guess people will learn to stay away from the edge either way.

I like getting rid of riding time for sure, the sooner the better.

I also like an action clock and if on the mat no one can get a turn or escape in 30 seconds then put them back up. If you get backs you can get another 30 seconds to work.




5.9 Stalling


5.9.1 Initiating Action. Action is to be maintained throughout the match by the contestants staying near the center of the mat and wrestling aggressively in all positions (top, bottom or neutral). Stalling is defined as one or both wrestlers attempting to avoid wrestling action as an offensive or defensive strategy. When a referee recognizes stalling, the first violation will be a warning; the second violation will result in 1 point being awarded to the opponent; the third violation is 1 point being awarded to the opponent; the fourth violation is 1 point being awarded to the opponent; and the fifth violation will result in a disqualification. A "double stalling" violation is given when both wrestlers fail to initiate an offense. (See Penalty Table for sequence of penalties.)


5.9.2 Neutral Position Stalling. Each wrestler must attempt to work toward the center of the mat and continue wrestling in an attempt to secure a takedown, RULE 5 / INFRACTIONS WR-57 regardless of the time or score of the match. Stalling in the neutral position is defined as follows: [/B]


5.9.2.1 Continually backing away from the opponent without creating offensive action. This happens all the time.[/B]


5.9.2.2 Near the edge of the wrestling area, a wrestler shall not leave the wrestling area unless it is to sprawl from an opponent's takedown attempt or when interlocked in wrestling. Over and over with this one[/B]


5.9.2.3 A wrestler shall be called for stalling if kicking out from a lower leg hold when this action results in the defending wrestler going out of the wrestling area. Happens a lot, have not called it for 2 or 3 years[/B]


5.9.2.4 Fleeing or attempting to flee the wrestling area as a means of avoiding being scored upon. (See Rule 5.13.) Have not seen this called much if at all but happens a lot.[/B]


5.9.3 Stalling-Offensive and Defensive Position. Offensive and defensive wrestlers shall make an attempt to sustain active wrestling and remain in the center. The offensive and defensive stalling situations include:


5.9.3.1 The offensive wrestler does not aggressively attempt to break down the opponent. This is big time abused.[/B]


5.9.3.2 Either wrestler pushing or pulling the opponent out of bounds to prevent scoring. Big time abused, people are constantly pushing or pulling people OB to avoid an escape. This is even easy to call, should be automatic.


5.9.3.3 The offensive wrestler grasping the defensive wrestler's leg(s) with both hands or arms, unless such action is designed to break down the opponent for the purpose of securing a fall or to prevent an escape or reversal. Big time stall tactic.


5.9.3.4 Repeatedly grasping or interlocking hands around a leg without attempting an offensive move. Big time stall tactic.


5.9.3.5 The defensive wrestler must initiate action to escape or reverse the opponent. Done some but not as bad as top guy stalling.


5.9.3.6 Repeatedly applying the legs while in the rear-standing position is stalling. With the defensive wrestler in a standing position, the offensive wrestler is allowed reaction time to attempt to bring the opponent back to the mat. Waters


5.9.4 Stalling by Delaying Match. Delaying the match-such as straggling back from out of bounds or unnecessarily changing or adjusting equipment-shall be penalized as stalling. This crap is non stop, guys dinking around and slowly getting back to the center while the other guy and ref wait. If the ref and one guy are ready and waiting then nail em don't wait on em.

This post was edited on 3/9 3:24 PM by MVPFAN

This post was edited on 3/9 4:13 PM by MVPFAN
MVP, it is amazing to think back on the season and reflect on how many times I witnessed the things listed above. And there was absolutely no thought by the refs to call any of it. The wrestler would have been shocked to get many of these called on him at this point, because the refs have taught them they don't need to worry about it.

It's just sad.
Someone should make a bunch of little cards with these stalling rules on it and hand them out @NCAA to the fans as they enter.
 
Originally posted by Huck:
I have to disagree on the shortage situation. I won't pretend to know all the workings but it seems to me there is "good old boys" club going on. As someone stated, for whatever reason, younger or different guys don't even get a chance at the "big time".
Think for a second on how many officials there are across the United States. There is no way with as many good hs officials there are that many of them could not be doing college matches. Are you telling me if the NCAA or Mike Allen were to talk to the State HS Associations and get their recommendations that those officials are going to turn down the chance to officiate at the college level? Guys simply have a hard time getting their shot at it.

I have a college buddy that has been doing NCAA stuff. He actually was the asst. in the Rutgers dual this year. I talk to him every year at the NCAA's and he tells me every year that he's hoping to get his shot at the big show...still hasn't happened. He's in his lower 40's, now sure how long he's been doing NCAA stuff but it's been awhile.

One of our state's best hs officials also does a lot of NCAA stuff. I talked to him this year at a tournament and he told me a story of how he made a call a big time coach didn't like and next thing you know his "assignments" changed. This gentleman is one hell of an official guys but it's just like anything else....you piss the wrong person off and it can change your career. Now that might be a little "dramatic" but there's no doubt it can have a big effect on your officiating assignments. All it takes is making a coach mad and him calling up Mr. Allen. To me this is why so many officials are afraid to call stalling the way they should. It boils down to them not want to take a chance and putting their neck on the line. Those that have "made it" are in a pretty good situation and don't want to blow it. I'm sure most already know this and understand it, the question becomes how do you fix it? What are the checks and balances in the situation? I'm sure the coaches all rate officials which to me really shouldn't be taken into deep consideration for assignments. To me, some sort of "committee" should be rating officials from an unbiased point of view.

Bottom line IMHO, officials are afraid to make the proper calls (mainly stalling) because it will have a direct affect on their pocketbooks/status. Until that fear is eliminated, same old, same old.
D1 Coaches need to better understand the situation as it now stands.

The officials are apparently paralyzed by fear. The ADs need to understand fans want action above all else and figure out a system that allows the officials to make judgement calls without the fear that these relatively famous coaches will have them shelved. The ADs can set up a system where coaches have little influence as far as who is officiating while still getting the best officials on the mat come tourny time. This is needed desperately.

If you can get an atmosphere where officials are actively about promoting action first, then I think it goes along way in helping the end product on the mat which is what the sport and the ADs want/need. If an official is worried about his job, based on the judgement calls he makes, this is a recipe for what we currently see on the mat much of the time--nothing.

Get a set, CALL the STALL.
 
The whole sport is being suffocated by stalling and the lack of calling it what it is-- STALLING-- is obviously killing the sport.

Conspiracy alert:

Do the "powers that be" want folk style wrestling dead? What better way to kill it than slowly squeeze the life from the sport from the top down. If D1 and the rest of college wrestling goes freestyle doesn't high school wrestling shortly follow?

The whole stalling thing has gotten progressively worse with no apparent concern as it relates to improving the product on the mat at the D1 level since the Olympic wrestling threats.

Food for thought.
 
How about the match can't end until there is at least a 3 point difference in score? (Didn't there used to be a similar rule in Freestyle?)
 
Originally posted by MVPFAN:
Here are the rules and if the gutless refs actually followed them like they are supposed to things would be fine. Someones ass needs to be on the line! In no other sport do they not enforce the rules. I agree with the poster who said the 5 count sucks, it has created more stalling because before a ref could hit a guy anytime he felt they needed it and now they just stall their asses off and know full well they won't get called because they can hear the count. They just move up for a second and the count starts over, it is a friggin joke. Meanwhile they have totally forgot about calling all the other stalling listed below that has nothing to do with a count. If they see stalling then call it, screw the counting crap! Call it like you are supposed to and how the rules say and people will adjust and quick. Take all the damn refs and have off season training watching all these bullshit matches and instruct them about all the places they should be calling stalling. Refs who don't follow the book can be let go.

I do like the push out if they are going to continue to not do their jobs. I do worry about it leading to teams getting a bunch of meat heads to win matches just by pushing people and it would really get boring. I'd maybe have it be a point if they step out on their own or to avoid a shot or wrestling hold like underhooks etc. If they do a push out they still need to call stalling if a guy runs all over inside the circle avoiding action. I guess people will learn to stay away from the edge either way.

I like getting rid of riding time for sure, the sooner the better.

I also like an action clock and if on the mat no one can get a turn or escape in 30 seconds then put them back up. If you get backs you can get another 30 seconds to work.






5.9 Stalling






















































5.9.3.6 Repeatedly applying the legs while in the rear-standing position is stalling. With the defensive wrestler in a standing position, the offensive wrestler is allowed reaction time to attempt to bring the opponent back to the mat. Waters









This post was edited on 3/9 3:24 PM by MVPFAN


This post was edited on 3/9 4:13 PM by MVPFAN
I don't think I've ever seen Waters apply the legs while standing. I agree that he should be required to return his opponent to the mat, and he usually does within 5 seconds. Regarding Gilman, I'm pretty sure Waters' legs were in every time before he stood up.

This post was edited on 3/10 12:42 PM by XiXiTiger
 
A friend out of Chicago ref's D1 and said coaches have a lot of input on ref assignments.
If you make a tough call against certain coaches it can eliminate you from getting good matches to ref.
Strangely, not making a call seems not to go against you. IF this has any truth to it, then it goes a ways to explain part of the problem.

Most states high school level ref's assign independent of popularity among coaches. A few states have a process where if a coach has a strong complaint against a ref, that ref is evaluated via a training official watching a couple of duals or video review if available and either dismiss the concerns or provide training. Not perfect by any stretch but I have seen it help. Other states allow coaches a "black-ball" list where they can request a ref not be assigned to their home duals. This gives the coaches a feeling of input as most states are stretched to having enough refs but at least it is communication.

While I like my friend, I don't have enough insight to know if what he says happens in D1 does.

As stated, coaches and athletes have a large role in this in the guise of strategy. Getting ahead and use a series of half/fake shots, blocking tie-ups or just plain back peddle until the warning. Play the edge, blanket rides or "position fight" on the bottom are also common.

I don't know why people, the NCAA and National High School committees are so against the push out. It does add another way to score that has no subjectivity, forces wrestlers to not play the edge and could cure a large part of the problem. Yes, a new problem of top guys just pushing the bottom guy out but thems the breaks. A match where a guy simply tries to push his opponent out of bounds 4 times and wins 4-1 or 4-2 is worlds better than the 2-1 win with riding time.
 
Originally posted by XiXiTiger:

Originally posted by MVPFAN:
Here are the rules and if the gutless refs actually followed them like they are supposed to things would be fine. Someones ass needs to be on the line! In no other sport do they not enforce the rules. I agree with the poster who said the 5 count sucks, it has created more stalling because before a ref could hit a guy anytime he felt they needed it and now they just stall their asses off and know full well they won't get called because they can hear the count. They just move up for a second and the count starts over, it is a friggin joke. Meanwhile they have totally forgot about calling all the other stalling listed below that has nothing to do with a count. If they see stalling then call it, screw the counting crap! Call it like you are supposed to and how the rules say and people will adjust and quick. Take all the damn refs and have off season training watching all these bullshit matches and instruct them about all the places they should be calling stalling. Refs who don't follow the book can be let go.

I do like the push out if they are going to continue to not do their jobs. I do worry about it leading to teams getting a bunch of meat heads to win matches just by pushing people and it would really get boring. I'd maybe have it be a point if they step out on their own or to avoid a shot or wrestling hold like underhooks etc. If they do a push out they still need to call stalling if a guy runs all over inside the circle avoiding action. I guess people will learn to stay away from the edge either way.

I like getting rid of riding time for sure, the sooner the better.

I also like an action clock and if on the mat no one can get a turn or escape in 30 seconds then put them back up. If you get backs you can get another 30 seconds to work.






5.9 Stalling















































































5.9.3.6 Repeatedly applying the legs while in the rear-standing position is stalling. With the defensive wrestler in a standing position, the offensive wrestler is allowed reaction time to attempt to bring the opponent back to the mat. Waters









This post was edited on 3/9 3:24 PM by MVPFAN

This post was edited on 3/9 4:13 PM by MVPFAN
I don't think I've ever seen Waters apply the legs while standing. I agree that he should be required to return his opponent to the mat, and he usually does within 5 seconds. Regarding Gilman, I'm pretty sure Waters' legs were in every time before he stood up.
Well the 5 count on the ankle rule also states that if the wrestler lets go at the count of 4 and then goes right back to it it is stalling so again the refs don't have a pair to call it.
 
Originally posted by 255:

A friend out of Chicago ref's D1 and said coaches have a lot of input on ref assignments.
If you make a tough call against certain coaches it can eliminate you from getting good matches to ref.
Strangely, not making a call seems not to go against you. IF this has any truth to it, then it goes a ways to explain part of the problem.

Most states high school level ref's assign independent of popularity among coaches. A few states have a process where if a coach has a strong complaint against a ref, that ref is evaluated via a training official watching a couple of duals or video review if available and either dismiss the concerns or provide training. Not perfect by any stretch but I have seen it help. Other states allow coaches a "black-ball" list where they can request a ref not be assigned to their home duals. This gives the coaches a feeling of input as most states are stretched to having enough refs but at least it is communication.

While I like my friend, I don't have enough insight to know if what he says happens in D1 does.

As stated, coaches and athletes have a large role in this in the guise of strategy. Getting ahead and use a series of half/fake shots, blocking tie-ups or just plain back peddle until the warning. Play the edge, blanket rides or "position fight" on the bottom are also common.

I don't know why people, the NCAA and National High School committees are so against the push out. It does add another way to score that has no subjectivity, forces wrestlers to not play the edge and could cure a large part of the problem. Yes, a new problem of top guys just pushing the bottom guy out but thems the breaks. A match where a guy simply tries to push his opponent out of bounds 4 times and wins 4-1 or 4-2 is worlds better than the 2-1 win with riding time.
Then no one is going to choose bottom, or attempt a stand up because they're just going to get run out of bounds.

Sorenson would've lost to Houdashelt and Tsirstis by major decisions if this was the case.
 
I agree Ace, I just don't have a better idea and have not heard one that can have a quick impact. Open to it though.
 
If there was a push out rule then it would only apply if the wrestlers were neutral. No points would count if control was established.
 
Originally posted by LutherAce:

Originally posted by 255:

A friend out of Chicago ref's D1 and said coaches have a lot of input on ref assignments.
If you make a tough call against certain coaches it can eliminate you from getting good matches to ref.
Strangely, not making a call seems not to go against you. IF this has any truth to it, then it goes a ways to explain part of the problem.

Most states high school level ref's assign independent of popularity among coaches. A few states have a process where if a coach has a strong complaint against a ref, that ref is evaluated via a training official watching a couple of duals or video review if available and either dismiss the concerns or provide training. Not perfect by any stretch but I have seen it help. Other states allow coaches a "black-ball" list where they can request a ref not be assigned to their home duals. This gives the coaches a feeling of input as most states are stretched to having enough refs but at least it is communication.

While I like my friend, I don't have enough insight to know if what he says happens in D1 does.

As stated, coaches and athletes have a large role in this in the guise of strategy. Getting ahead and use a series of half/fake shots, blocking tie-ups or just plain back peddle until the warning. Play the edge, blanket rides or "position fight" on the bottom are also common.

I don't know why people, the NCAA and National High School committees are so against the push out. It does add another way to score that has no subjectivity, forces wrestlers to not play the edge and could cure a large part of the problem. Yes, a new problem of top guys just pushing the bottom guy out but thems the breaks. A match where a guy simply tries to push his opponent out of bounds 4 times and wins 4-1 or 4-2 is worlds better than the 2-1 win with riding time.
Then no one is going to choose bottom, or attempt a stand up because they're just going to get run out of bounds.

Sorenson would've lost to Houdashelt and Tsirstis by major decisions if this was the case.
Potentially a valid concern...easy solution though...award no points on a push out when the wrestlers start from the top/bottom(referee's) position, only when both wrestlers are neutral.

The current boring state of D1 wrestling reminds me of when years ago North Carolina, and others, used the "four corners", ahem, offense, to stall out the clock in a basketball game. It was boring and the fans didn't like it...boom, then the shot clock was born. BB games were turning into boring, difficult to officiate slam fests in the paint...bam, a three point line is created and naturally teams and players spaced themselves out to cover the deep shot, etc.

Wrestling needs to learn from things like this in other sporting contests and implement new rules so the wrestling version of the "four corners" offense does not kill this sport at the D1 level.

I have steadfastly preferred that rule changes be made to let the wrestlers sort things out between each other v. relying on refs to call stalling, which I don't think is going to happen. Then I read in this thread that there may be some incentive on refs to play it safe and not make potentially controversial calls so as not to be skipped over for future assignments and now I am even more persuaded that the refs are not going to solve this problem. Rule changes, rule changes, rule changes!
 
Originally posted by Old_wrestling_fan:

Originally posted by LutherAce:

Originally posted by 255:

A friend out of Chicago ref's D1 and said coaches have a lot of input on ref assignments.
If you make a tough call against certain coaches it can eliminate you from getting good matches to ref.
Strangely, not making a call seems not to go against you. IF this has any truth to it, then it goes a ways to explain part of the problem.

Most states high school level ref's assign independent of popularity among coaches. A few states have a process where if a coach has a strong complaint against a ref, that ref is evaluated via a training official watching a couple of duals or video review if available and either dismiss the concerns or provide training. Not perfect by any stretch but I have seen it help. Other states allow coaches a "black-ball" list where they can request a ref not be assigned to their home duals. This gives the coaches a feeling of input as most states are stretched to having enough refs but at least it is communication.

While I like my friend, I don't have enough insight to know if what he says happens in D1 does.

As stated, coaches and athletes have a large role in this in the guise of strategy. Getting ahead and use a series of half/fake shots, blocking tie-ups or just plain back peddle until the warning. Play the edge, blanket rides or "position fight" on the bottom are also common.

I don't know why people, the NCAA and National High School committees are so against the push out. It does add another way to score that has no subjectivity, forces wrestlers to not play the edge and could cure a large part of the problem. Yes, a new problem of top guys just pushing the bottom guy out but thems the breaks. A match where a guy simply tries to push his opponent out of bounds 4 times and wins 4-1 or 4-2 is worlds better than the 2-1 win with riding time.
Then no one is going to choose bottom, or attempt a stand up because they're just going to get run out of bounds.

Sorenson would've lost to Houdashelt and Tsirstis by major decisions if this was the case.
Potentially a valid concern...easy solution though...award no points on a push out when the wrestlers start from the top/bottom(referee's) position, only when both wrestlers are neutral.

The current boring state of D1 wrestling reminds me of when years ago North Carolina, and others, used the "four corners", ahem, offense, to stall out the clock in a basketball game. It was boring and the fans didn't like it...boom, then the shot clock was born. BB games were turning into boring, difficult to officiate slam fests in the paint...bam, a three point line is created and naturally teams and players spaced themselves out to cover the deep shot, etc.

Wrestling needs to learn from things like this in other sporting contests and implement new rules so the wrestling version of the "four corners" offense does not kill this sport at the D1 level.

I have steadfastly preferred that rule changes be made to let the wrestlers sort things out between each other v. relying on refs to call stalling, which I don't think is going to happen. Then I read in this thread that there may be some incentive on refs to play it safe and not make potentially controversial calls so as not to be skipped over for future assignments and now I am even more persuaded that the refs are not going to solve this problem. Rule changes, rule changes, rule changes!
The coaches need to take the lead and also realize they are part of the problem as to how the matches are officiated. IF they really wanted to promote action they would find a way to make it work.
 
Fwiw, I was on a Minnesota board and they were basically accusing Iowa of the same stalling tactics that we complain about, saying how pushing people out is not wrestling, and that our style is boring to watch...........

Ohio State and Penn State fans agreed with those sentiments.

What say you, knowledgeable Hawkeye wrestling fans?
 
Originally posted by EvilMonkeyInTheCloset:
Fwiw, I was on a Minnesota board and they were basically accusing Iowa of the same stalling tactics that we complain about, saying how pushing people out is not wrestling, and that our style is boring to watch...........

Ohio State and Penn State fans agreed with those sentiments.

What say you, knowledgeable Hawkeye wrestling fans?
It seems to me that say wrestling A is pushing can't wrestling B push back or hold his ground or is it easier to let him push you and use much strength to avoid it?
If a wrestler keeps backing up to the ob line dam right just shove hs butt all the way out.

As for when bottom man stands up and guy just runs or pushes him ob the rule is there it is stalling on the top again no balls by the ref to call it.

Maybe only answer is make it like MMA everything goes let the wrestlers decide it
 
Originally posted by 86_90:
The whole sport is being suffocated by stalling and the lack of calling it what it is-- STALLING-- is obviously killing the sport.

Conspiracy alert:

Do the "powers that be" want folk style wrestling dead? What better way to kill it than slowly squeeze the life from the sport from the top down. If D1 and the rest of college wrestling goes freestyle doesn't high school wrestling shortly follow?

The whole stalling thing has gotten progressively worse with no apparent concern as it relates to improving the product on the mat at the D1 level since the Olympic wrestling threats.

Food for thought.
I like folk style better than freestyle. I don't understand why coaches and officials don't get together during the college wrestling off season and discuss the rules. Maybe they do. I'm new here but I have followed the HR and find it to be the place I want to get in trouble on in regards to the subject of wrestling. I would like to know, if possible, what does Mike Allen do?
 
Originally posted by EvilMo...Closet:
Fwiw, I was on a Minnesota board and they were basically accusing Iowa of the same stalling tactics that we complain about, saying how pushing people out is not wrestling, and that our style is boring to watch...........

Ohio State and Penn State fans agreed with those sentiments.

What say you, knowledgeable Hawkeye wrestling fans?

For these other programs to pretend it's mutually exclusive to Iowa wrestling is laughable at best. It's a nation wide epidemic.

Good handfighting and the push-pull, heavy on the head is the Iowa style and can be boring at times, but while we're wrestling that style, what are our opponents doing?! It sure as hell isn't being offensive or taking risk. So my question is... Would you rather see a guy fighting hands and moving forward or see a guy avoiding tying up and circling away?

For the love of Dan Gable, it's just hilarious that people want to put this on Iowa.
Posted from Rivals Mobile
 
Originally posted by Gobblin:

Originally posted by EvilMo...Closet:
Fwiw, I was on a Minnesota board and they were basically accusing Iowa of the same stalling tactics that we complain about, saying how pushing people out is not wrestling, and that our style is boring to watch...........

Ohio State and Penn State fans agreed with those sentiments.

What say you, knowledgeable Hawkeye wrestling fans?

For these other programs to pretend it's mutually exclusive to Iowa wrestling is laughable at best. It's a nation wide epidemic.

Good handfighting and the push-pull, heavy on the head is the Iowa style and can be boring at times, but while we're wrestling that style, what are our opponents doing?! It sure as hell isn't being offensive or taking risk. So my question is... Would you rather see a guy fighting hands and moving forward or see a guy avoiding tying up and circling away?

For the love of Dan Gable, it's just hilarious that people want to put this on Iowa.

Posted from Rivals Mobile
Gobblin, I definitely agree with you here that it is a national problem, and as much as I hate to say it, Iowa has some guys that are becoming well versed in this. I think mainly because the way matches are called.
I see some on here wanting the push out and getting rid of riding time. I don't have a problem with getting rid of riding time but if the first guy chooses down and gets out, then in the third period starts on top even with out the benefit of getting a riding time point, why wouldn't you still not try and ride them out with the way matches are called know. Instead of winning 2-0 now you would win 1-0. Even if the bottom guy does get out you are still tied and go to OT. and who ever can get out there is going to win. Still not solving the problem of inactivity while in the top position.

Guess my point is I think you need a point for pushing out while either in neutral or riding, and you most definitely have to start calling stalling on the top guy if he isn't getting of to the side, working for a pinning combination. You can get rid of the riding point but I can still see stalling in the top position if they don't start calling it like it was in the 80's and 90's when wrestling was a lot more entertaining. and could really get you excited with all the action.
 
Originally posted by GOARMYSPEC68:

Originally posted by 86_90:
The whole sport is being suffocated by stalling and the lack of calling it what it is-- STALLING-- is obviously killing the sport.

Conspiracy alert:

Do the "powers that be" want folk style wrestling dead? What better way to kill it than slowly squeeze the life from the sport from the top down. If D1 and the rest of college wrestling goes freestyle doesn't high school wrestling shortly follow?

The whole stalling thing has gotten progressively worse with no apparent concern as it relates to improving the product on the mat at the D1 level since the Olympic wrestling threats.

Food for thought.
I like folk style better than freestyle. I don't understand why coaches and officials don't get together during the college wrestling off season and discuss the rules. Maybe they do. I'm new here but I have followed the HR and find it to be the place I want to get in trouble on in regards to the subject of wrestling. I would like to know, if possible, what does Mike Allen do?
Big 10, Mac and Big 12 Coordinator of Officials--hires and oversees the officials for those conferences.

Here it is from the man himself from an interview with the Predicament: "...I came back as the coordinator of officials for the Big 10, the Big 12 and the MAC conference. I now hire all the officials, train and evaluate them for those conferences.
Some of the things I watch for include how the officials position themselves during a match. It is important to see how they handle themselves with the wrestlers and coaches both on and off the mat. They all know the rules but can they apply them during competition. That is what makes the difference."
 
Stalling caused me to:
3dgrin.r191677.gif




1. start sniffing glue again.



What about you?



This post was edited on 3/11 9:34 AM by 86_90
 
Long time reader but new to the board so go easy on me. I've been a fan of our great sport since I was a kid growing up in a wrestling family and I agree that something needs done to improve it or we will generate no new fans and it will kill wrestling. I agree with a lot of what has been said on here for change but I have a multi-part question. Do the officials get graded on their performance, if they do by who, and how are they held accountable for not doing their jobs right? If I failed to accuratley do my job 50% of the time I would be unemployed.

As for the lack of interest in officiating at the college level I find that hard to believe but maybe they are not actively looking either. I happen to know of a couple HS officials that would be better at calling stalling and would not hesitate to call it either. Maybe they never wanted to be in the spotlight or even pursued it but is there a way to gain interest in that area and get rid of the BS we have going on now? Maybe actively go to state tournaments or other Nationals and approach the best of the best for the big time?

Anyway hopefully I can meet some of you guys down in St. Louis next week after reading your commentary and PBP all year long, all of it was greatly appreciated and I just wish it wasn't ending soon!
 
Stalling thread. Many well thought out opinions on the problems and several good suggestions as to how it can be fixed. Good read ahead of Tourny Season. Please pass on to your friendly official.
 
LOL I remember this thread.

I think its funny right now that everyone seems to forget how bad NATO stalled out in his first win ever over Gilman. Not really us hawk fans but I dont care if he is defending champ. NATO is what 1-4 all time vs Gilman and this was his win. Gilman is a much better wrestler at this time than a year ago. NATO's glory ride is about to end soon and quite frankly he owes Moisey unlimited Xmas cards for taking care of a guy that owned him in STL.

That Moisey pin is the best thing that ever happend to Thomas. 2nd best was the confidence he learned in that Dance comeback. Cant wait.
 
LOL I remember this thread.

I think its funny right now that everyone seems to forget how bad NATO stalled out in his first win ever over Gilman. Not really us hawk fans but I dont care if he is defending champ. NATO is what 1-4 all time vs Gilman and this was his win. Gilman is a much better wrestler at this time than a year ago. NATO's glory ride is about to end soon and quite frankly he owes Moisey unlimited Xmas cards for taking care of a guy that owned him in STL.

That Moisey pin is the best thing that ever happend to Thomas. 2nd best was the confidence he learned in that Dance comeback. Cant wait.

Can't wait for the rematch with NATO. I read in one of the threads he was something like 9-1 against NATO going into that match. Could be off, but he obviously had his # before the end of last year.
 
This has nothing to do with stalling but, as many times the Indiana wrestler slapped Gilman in the face and head and the ref did nothing. If the ref finally did something then I missed it because I was busy beating the crap out of my foot stool.:mad:
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ihawkd9times
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT