Given the league they play in ... they have some developed depth. Their SS Ellsworth seemed pretty darn good to me.How is the DB unit for Iswho?
If our WR unit is better than last year, then that’s where you could see big Nate dominate.
Given the league they play in ... they have some developed depth. Their SS Ellsworth seemed pretty darn good to me.How is the DB unit for Iswho?
If our WR unit is better than last year, then that’s where you could see big Nate dominate.
They might want to watch our 1st 2 games before deciding what they want to doNot going to happen. ISU will be selling out against the run and daring Stanley to beat them over the top. With a lack of proven playmakers (maybe we have some, but very few are PROVEN) that is absolutely the right thing to do.
A shootout is possible, but I'd expect another low-scoring game as both offenses struggle to get into any kind of rhythm.
PSU, Purdue, Michigan, Wisconsin. Any of those wins was more important than the ISU game. Did you enjoy getting your asses handed to you by Connecticut at home? How about losing your last four in a row and getting mauled in Boise?
Clowns gonna clown
The main thing the ISU game is the key to...is keeping those douches off of our board for several weeks.
Not really, if the Hawks win they flock here to tell us why it doesn’t count due to their endless chain of excuses. If we lose they camp out here night and day telling us how the world has changed and isu has taken over.
The Hawks have won 3 in a row in Jack Trice, relax. It will likely be a close game, but I am picking the Hawkeyes !I don't know about the result of the game just yet, but Purdy is probably going to give Iowa fits. I expect the Cyclones will try to hit on some quick passes early to see if he can get comfortable. Then they will set up some QB runs to try to take advantage of Iowa's aggressive DL, and I predict these will work. Once the ISU offense is rolling, look out. I've seen this movie too many times - going into Ames is a very hostile environment, and Iowa usually looks "tight" early. Meanwhile, ISU gains momentum and the fans start to feel it. They also cross into a very gray area with blasting music right up to the snap count. If Iowa expects anything to be fair in that game, Iowa is going to be sorely disappointed. On the other hand, if the Hawks truly understand the environment they are walking into (should help with Stanley having played there before) and they can put ISU in an early hole, I love how it sets up.
I'm truly in a 50-50 mode on this game. Maybe I'm just haunted by too many bad memories of games at Jack Trice.
That's more of an Iowa thing.The best part of beating isu is the lengths clown fans go to tell us how it really didn’t count.
That's more of an Iowa thing.
That's more of an Iowa thing.
Do you see the irony in your post and presence here? (of course not).
You're approaching a clone-like lack of self-awareness.
How is the DB unit for Iswho?
If our WR unit is better than last year, then that’s where you could see big Nate dominate.
An undefeated regular season and shot at a national title? Who cares, right?
Long time ago but there were articles and with the BCS metrics still would have had OSU ahead of Iowa with that win to play against Miami. So in the end even if Iowa had won that game would've ended up in the same bowl game.
All true, but Payne and Peavey were both exceptional.The best player in the DB unit is Greg Eisworth who was one of the top tackle leaders on last season's team. Braxton Lewis will be in one of the other Safety Spots and led the team in INT's last Season. The 3rd Safety spot will come down to either Amechie Walker who converted to Safety from WR last Season but is considered the 2nd fastest player in the team behind only Kene Nwangwu, or Rice Transfer Justin Bickham who led Rice in PBU's. The CB spots will be Datrone Young and Anthony Johnson who both played well in the games they had to step in and play last season. The Coaching staff says Young and Johnson are the best young Cover Corner Duos they have ever coached. It is an above average group who is ranked towards the top of the Big 12 DB Groups.
Yes they were. Those 2 are the ones I think the defense will miss the most from the defensive losses.All true, but Payne and Peavey were both exceptional.
I think one thing that I'm not taking into account is the loss of Montgomery and Butler. The former is MUCH MUCH MUCH more important as he was so tough to bring down and just such a tough runner. Butler was also a great player and probably better than any Iowa WR in the last 20 years, but I kind of expect ISU to have solid WRs at this point... not sure why, but they seem to always have a couple of them every year.
So yeah, if ISU can't run the ball, I'd think Iowa has a distinct advantage in terms of time of possession and eventually wearing down the ISU defense. Problem is a turnover or penalty here or there can change a game quickly. Hawks really have to be focused and ready to execute that day, and it won't be easy.
The ISU/Iowa games is possibly the difference between a good season and a great season for both schools. Does Iowa want to go 11-1 again and miss the NT because of ISU, Again? I know many a hawk that can not forget that 1 loss!
Montgomery will be much harder to replace than Butler. The latter had some spectacular grabs and some critical ones, but he also had more than his share of drops. Montgomery got yards that weren't there, which is not going to happen this year if the OL isn't better than it was last year. Montgomery also only lost two fumbles in two years ..... and FWIW, replays on both indicated they weren't lost fumbles.Great point. You look at the bowl game and the last 3-4 regular season games. Those 2 were the offense. Look how they struggled with out Montgomery the rest of the Baylor game after he got kicked out and 1st half vs Texas. KState and bowl game those 2 had the bulk of the yards and put up massive numbers. Teams won't load up the box without Montgomery now and they lose the safety blanket of just throwing it up and let Butler go up and grab it as he did multiple times last year.
Given the league they play in ... they have some developed depth. Their SS Ellsworth seemed pretty darn good to me.
They might want to watch our 1st 2 games before deciding what they want to do![]()
Montgomery will be much harder to replace than Butler. The latter had some spectacular grabs and some critical ones, but he also had more than his share of drops. Montgomery got yards that weren't there, which is not going to happen this year if the OL isn't better than it was last year. Montgomery also only lost two fumbles in two years ..... and FWIW, replays on both indicated they weren't lost fumbles.
The key to ISU's team this year will be the OL. The defense should be very good. The skill positions are not a cause for concern. The placekicking is OK, the punting is not.
What are you smoking? 11-1 with our schedule..Iowa needs to gel by the ISU game. If they beat ISU at ISU they go 11-1
I don't know about the result of the game just yet, but Purdy is probably going to give Iowa fits. I expect the Cyclones will try to hit on some quick passes early to see if he can get comfortable. Then they will set up some QB runs to try to take advantage of Iowa's aggressive DL, and I predict these will work. Once the ISU offense is rolling, look out. I've seen this movie too many times - going into Ames is a very hostile environment, and Iowa usually looks "tight" early. Meanwhile, ISU gains momentum and the fans start to feel it. They also cross into a very gray area with blasting music right up to the snap count. If Iowa expects anything to be fair in that game, Iowa is going to be sorely disappointed. On the other hand, if the Hawks truly understand the environment they are walking into (should help with Stanley having played there before) and they can put ISU in an early hole, I love how it sets up.
I'm truly in a 50-50 mode on this game. Maybe I'm just haunted by too many bad memories of games at Jack Trice.
This. The game may illustrate the value of a playmaking QB/offense.
Purdy may have more turnovers but more than compensate for them
but making key plays at critical points. In the meantime, our offense is carefully stringing together another series of 3 and outs.
Clown fan should try harder.
This. The game may illustrate the value of a playmaking QB/offense.
Purdy may have more turnovers but more than compensate for them
but making key plays at critical points. In the meantime, our offense is carefully stringing together another series of 3 and outs.
This might be the smartest clone fan in the world. We appreciate your support but your Iowa outlook while appreciated, might be a bit optimistic. That being said, thanks for believing.Iowa is obviously going 15-0 this year. Possibly the greatest college team ever. Would probably beat the NY Giants this year.
Thanks for the input about your team.Actually, depth is an issue this year. I think the two starting corners (Young and Johnson) are going to be good but after that it's a bit of a crapshoot. Eisworth is very good at safety and Lewis or the Rice transfer will fill the other spot and be fine.
So if ISU wins this year, I assume we wont hear any complaints about ISU having a bye week before Iowa game?Best to ignore clown fans chirping about missing their first game last year. It has been the go to excuse for almost a year now.
So if ISU wins this year, I assume we wont hear any complaints about ISU having a bye week before Iowa game?
So if ISU wins this year, I assume we wont hear any complaints about ISU having a bye week before Iowa game?
Well, not sure what legit defenses are, but 6 of 7 Big XII bowl game opponents (Alabama, Cal, Georgia, Missouri, Syracuse, Washington St) were held below their season scoring average.Could you list the legit defenses Purdy had to play against last year? Iowa and TCU were easily the best defenses ISU played last year. He didn't play against either of them.
So if ISU wins this year, I assume we wont hear any complaints about ISU having a bye week before Iowa game?