It’s official-another Whistle Blower

[noleclone2]

According to New York Times Friday this second intelligence official is higher up food chain and has more direct information about the events than the first whistle-blower. If that is true seems a great way to play it and intentional timed. Basically after a week of right wing spinning away other whistle blower you simply drop a bigger one a week later. The administration at this point has to wonder how many more are out there. When you are guilty, this hurts your defense tactics bigly...

 

[gonegolfing]

If one of these people are non-partisan, it could be tough for Trump.

 

[DFSNOLE]

If one of these people are non-partisan, it could be tough for Trump.

The first whistleblower's report was mirrored by the transcript released by Trump. It was deemed credible by Trump's own IG. That isn't enough?

 

[The Tradition]

The first whistleblower's report was mirrored by the transcript released by Trump. It was deemed credible by Trump's own IG. That isn't enough?

No, it didn't work. So they have to try again.

 

[prlyles]

No, it didn't work. So they have to try again.

Please explain

 

[Rudolph]

No, it didn't work. So they have to try again.

Do you like corruption?

 

[ThorneStockton]

Please explain

What he means is that he doesn't care what Trump does.

Trump could shoot someone live on Fox News and people like Trad would say "nice try liberals, maybe you'll get something to stick next time."

 

[MitchLL]

Tic toc, tic toc...tic toc....

BTW: There's likely more than these two.

 

[DFSNOLE]

No, it didn't work. So they have to try again.

It is not a replacement. It is an addition. That really shouldn't be that hard to understand.

 

[baddog25]

If one of these people are non-partisan, it could be tough for Trump.

Linda Tripp was unbiased. LOL

 

[SoMplsHawkI]

No, it didn't work for me. So they have to try again.

FIFY

 

[theiacowtipper]

No, it didn't work. So they have to try again.

So....not that I think you’ll answer this, but is there anything in the initial whistleblower complaint that was not in the transcript? Maybe you mean it’s not enough to remove someone from office but hard to believe you mean it isn’t true.

 

[dgordo]

What he means is that he doesn't care what Trump does.

Trump could shoot someone live on Fox News and people like Trad would say "nice try liberals, maybe you'll get something to stick next time."

even if he did shoot someone, that’s ok. Remember the time Obama droned a bunch of innocent Iraqis? Same thing.

 

[The Tradition]

So....not that I think you’ll answer this, but is there anything in the initial whistleblower complaint that was not in the transcript? Maybe you mean it’s not enough to remove someone from office but hard to believe you mean it isn’t true.

What Biden did was worse.

 

[Huey Grey]

So what's the new talking point to explain this away? The secondhand defense is now shredded and this was the GOP's big card to play after the initial whistleblower came out.

Republicans are getting to the point where they will just have to say that they are ok with the president bribing foreign countries to interfere with our elections.

 

[dgordo]

So what's the new talking point to explain this away? The secondhand defense is now shredded and this was the GOP's big card to play after the initial whistleblower came out.

Republicans are getting to the point where they will just have to say that they are ok with the president bribing foreign countries to interfere with our elections.

they are already saying they are ok with that.

 

[khael-hawk]

Do you like corruption?

If he liked corruption, why would he want Biden looked into?

 

[theiacowtipper]

What Biden did was worse.

Most of the international community, including the European Union, wanted this prosecutor removed. They said it repeatedly and they said it publicly. The prosecutor in question was not actively investigating Hunters company. Joe Biden was articulating the current position of the United States government. Donald Trump basically asked a foreign government's help in winning an election.

Even if your fondest dreams are true, and Joe Biden is corrupt, all you’ve got is the two of them should share a cell. Probably, Hunter Biden took advantage of his fathers position to make some money. That’s the way this country works. See children of Trump.

 

[tumorboy]

What Biden did was worse.

The Catholic Church loved members like you.

 

[SoMplsHawkI]

What Biden did was worse.

Biden made national security worse? As VP? Worse than what the Pussy Grabber-in-Chief is doing? You seem to have DBS.

 

[ironside1]

No, it didn't work. So they have to try again.

How didn’t it work?

 

[goldmom]

No, it didn't work. So they have to try again.

Yep. He or she was waiting in case they were needed. Kavanaugh 2.0

 

[Joes Place]

Do you like corruption?

He doesn't understand that actual investigations take longer than an episode of CSI:Miami

 

[goldmom]

Most of the international community, including the European Union, wanted this prosecutor removed. They said it repeatedly and they said it publicly. The prosecutor in question was not actively investigating Hunters company. Joe Biden was articulating the current position of the United States government. Donald Trump basically asked a foreign government's help in winning an election.

Even if your fondest dreams are true, and Joe Biden is corrupt, all you’ve got is the two of them should share a cell. Probably, Hunter Biden took advantage of his fathers position to make some money. That’s the way this country works. See children of Trump.

The difference is Trumps kids were in business long before he ran for any office. Use his money and his name? Sure. It's not illegal. He was a private citizen. There IS a difference.

 

[goldmom]

It is not a replacement. It is an addition. That really shouldn't be that hard to understand.

Oh, it's not. This person was ALWAYS there, but only if needed. It's not that hard to understand...

 

[theiacowtipper]

The difference is Trumps kids were in business long before he ran for any office. Use his money and his name? Sure. It's not illegal. He was a private citizen. There IS a difference.

So Biden convinced the Obama administration and the European Union that this prosecutor need to be booted? That was the reason? Come on. At worst, Biden has a he should have known better issue.

 

[Joes Place]

The difference is Trumps kids were in business long before he ran for any office.

So? They're tied to HIS business, which he should have divested himself from if he wanted to be POTUS.

 

[Joes Place]

No, it didn't work. So they have to try again.

Actually, one way to keep yourself out of jail is to report the evidence of the crimes you were an eyewitness to, vs. covering them up.

More people will be coming out with info and flipping, because they don't wanna end up like the 40+ people Nixon told/implied he'd pardon, then didn't. And they all went to jail.

Only person that got a pardon in the end: Nixon.

 

[aflachawk]

View embedded media

According to New York Times Friday this second intelligence official is higher up food chain and has more direct information about the events than the first whistle-blower. If that is true seems a great way to play it and intentional timed. Basically after a week of right wing spinning away other whistle blower you simply drop a bigger one a week later. The administration at this point has to wonder how many more are out there. When you are guilty, this hurts your defense tactics bigly...

with Trump releasing the transcript what there to blow a whistle about?

 

[Menace Sockeyes]

He’s just flailing and flinging his feces around at this point, looking for anything to stick. How convenient that Perry just bailed on him...

 

[Joes Place]

with Trump releasing the transcript what there to blow a whistle about?

Additional evidence that was not in the alleged "transcript".

While this would be obvious to the average person, you're clearly exposing yourself as not really understanding how any of this works....

 

[Huey Grey]

with Trump releasing the transcript what there to blow a whistle about?

That's why Trump supporters should be shitting their pants over this. The new whistleblower was higher up on the food chain and has firsthand concerns. Chances are it goes beyond what Trump has admitted to.

 

[dekhawk]

Oh, it's not. This person was ALWAYS there, but only if needed. It's not that hard to understand...

Apparently it is for you.

Your continued defense of trumps illegal acts are amazing. When will it be ok to follow the constitution again ?

 

[ottumwan in tx]

it does not matter if there are fifty whistle blowers if all they are eating is nothingburgers and then blowing into a broken whistle with hot air that makes no sound

 

[Formerly Rockymtnole]

That's why Trump supporters should be shitting their pants over this. The new whistleblower was higher up on the food chain and has firsthand concerns. Chances are it goes beyond what Trump has admitted to.

If it’s what you say it is I love it.

 

[strummingram]

That's why Trump supporters should be shitting their pants over this.

I'm guessing that Trump supporters wear diapers by now.

 

[ottumwan in tx]

So? They're tied to HIS business, which he should have divested himself from if he wanted to be POTUS.

I thought he did

 

[ottumwan in tx]

I'm guessing that Trump supporters wear diapers by now.

yes, we freaked out over kavenaugh and Russia. and poon on a bus. so we used up all the diapers back then. no more crap left .

 

[Rudolph]

If he liked corruption, why would he want Biden looked into?

By foreign governments? Withholding $ as leverage? Why not use US agencies? Oh yeah. Because everything is corrupt so nothing matters. The con of the autocrat.

 

[Huey Grey]

You just know that someone in Trump's cabinet will come out, eventually. When indictments are on the line, they will save their own asses.