I would vote for him
I would only vote for him if I had no choice. We could have solidified voting rights but he turned his back on the party.Never happen. There’s a section of democrats who absolutely would not vote for him.
He was a Republican far too many times...There’s no way a majority of delegates are going to support Joe “Wishy-Washy” Manchin. We all know how reliable he’s been towards the party, and he can go fook himself.
Could we solidify voting rights and add the Save act as a compromise? Any way to work thatI would only vote for him if I had no choice. We could have solidified voting rights but he turned his back on the party.
You are dumber than a bag of hammers…They should allow multiple people to throw their names in the hat for consideration. It would be wild if the democrats spit in the face of democracy 3 election cycles in a row and let the elites pick their candidate.
For calling on the democrats to host an open primary? You really hate democracy that much?You are dumber than a bag of hammers…
“ It would be wild if the democrats spit in the face of democracy 3 election cycles in a row.”For calling on the democrats to host an open primary? You really hate democracy that much?
Yeah.. what about it? Truth upset you?“ It would be wild if the democrats spit in the face of democracy 3 election cycles in a row.”
This part tool bag….
Your life is a embarrassment.@Franisdaman please stick to posting about Caitlin Clark. Your political threads are giving me second hand embarrassment for you.
Quit insulting hammers.You are dumber than a bag of hammers…
I get what you’re saying, but the guy literally left the Democratic Party.I don't get it. Everyone says Trump is an existential threat and in the next breath say that they couldn't support Mancin under any circumstances. So is existential threat not sufficient enough to warrant a little flexibility in terms of picking a winning candidate?
Ten years from now they will say the Republican candidate for president is an existential threat and Donald Trump wasn’t so bad.I don't get it. Everyone says Trump is an existential threat and in the next breath say that they couldn't support Mancin under any circumstances. So is existential threat not sufficient enough to warrant a little flexibility in terms of picking a winning candidate?
Not 10 years, the next election. There's at least a dozen authoritarian fascists ready to pick up where Trump left off. Most of them are far more capable than Trump is as well.Ten years from now they will say the Republican candidate for president is an existential threat and Donald Trump wasn’t so bad.
I'm not exactly pushing Manchin as a viable candidate. I'm just saying that maybe, given the degree of fear brought on by the thought of a second Trump term, electability might be the most important factor in who the Dems s/b looking for as their standard bearer.I get what you’re saying, but the guy literally left the Democratic Party.