ADVERTISEMENT

Joe pardons Hunter

bafkreietk6lwz3qjvrpsx4jnzd4xwis2llcw5n43kwqkot7r4dp57yf6bm@jpeg
 
Let’s see. Drug abuser, woman abuser, abandoned his child, sold out his country to enrich he and his family, enticed his widowed sister in law into his perverse world, massive tax cheat. “Everyone” might be a little generous here. Everyone knew the pardon was coming because it’s the Bidens , but Joe lied about his plans before the election like the champion of political expediency he has always been.
The Super Maga's are really disgusted by Hunter and the Biden's.

Everything is projection.
 
I assume everyone has found some common ground and came to a logical agreement without any name calling or hypocritical views.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WSC72
Not regretting my decision to avoid corporate news the last month. Hearing it has been breathless coverage of this last 3 days while ignoring the far far more important and darker stuff.

Enjoying my NPR in AM and PM commute. Reminds me of 40 years ago listening to it with my dad on way to school.
 
Everyone would protect their kids from this shit if given the opportunity. Fake anger from Republicans.
YOU DO NOT HAVE ANY KIDS

Christopher, you are like 60 years old and in a world with like 4 billion women not one of them had a kid with you. There are around 300 school districts in Iowa and you work at one of the worst. There are like 400 million twitter users yet they banned you. You are always in the top 3 most clueless/insane posters on this website. Just so you know, you are not the smart one, you are the dumbass.
 
Just don’t continually lie about it before doing so. 🥴
Yeah... the Republicans hate those leaders that are known to lie... right?? 😂😂 you can't make this up, right? Can you even pronounce the word hypocritical? 😂
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: BelemNole
Make the 10 years, 11 months pardon time frame understandable please....
That’s probably the most troubling part of this. The whole concept of a pardon is supposed to be to overturn a conviction that you believe is faulty or to commute a sentence that you believe is excessive.

But Joe didn’t just overturn Hunter’s existing convictions to keep him out of jail. He basically gave Hunter blanket immunity from prosecution for anything that has happened over the past 11 years. And the fact that Joe chose such a very specific period of time that corresponds with the start of Hunter’s business dealings in Ukraine is more than a little suspicious.
 
That’s probably the most troubling part of this. The whole concept of a pardon is supposed to be to overturn a conviction that you believe is faulty or to commute a sentence that you believe is excessive.

But Joe didn’t just overturn Hunter’s existing convictions to keep him out of jail. He basically gave Hunter blanket immunity from prosecution for anything that has happened over the past 11 years. And the fact that Joe chose such a very specific period of time that corresponds with the start of Hunter’s business dealings in Ukraine is more than a little suspicious.
Probably just a coincidence.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: WSC72
You idiots tried saying everything was a conspiracy theory.




Now we get to go through the dirty laundry.
i never said that

i typically just point out that for all the shrieking about the obvious biden family corruption there never seems to be any actual prosecution of it

lots of congressional hearings and fox news appearances...not a lot of real attempts at accountabilty
 
i never said that

i typically just point out that for all the shrieking about the obvious biden family corruption there never seems to be any actual prosecution of it

lots of congressional hearings and fox news appearances...not a lot of real attempts at accountabilty
Yea.... this was purely coincidence.




Have a good day.
 
And the plea deal was rejected by the judge who has the authority to do that. It was also a extremely friendly plea deal so I don't entirely blame him for rejecting it.
As I said earlier:

"Let's give the judge the benefit of doubt and imagine he or she thought the deal was too lenient. If that were the case, the reasonable thing to do would have been to negotiate a deal that would meet the judge's standards. I think we'd know if that was tried; but maybe not."
 
That’s probably the most troubling part of this. The whole concept of a pardon is supposed to be to overturn a conviction that you believe is faulty or to commute a sentence that you believe is excessive.

But Joe didn’t just overturn Hunter’s existing convictions to keep him out of jail. He basically gave Hunter blanket immunity from prosecution for anything that has happened over the past 11 years. And the fact that Joe chose such a very specific period of time that corresponds with the start of Hunter’s business dealings in Ukraine is more than a little suspicious.
Agreed. Nixon is probably one of the few comparably broad scopes. At least there, given the uniqueness of a sitting president actually being impeached and what the first half of the decade looked like, Ford's "good of the country" rationale was at least plausible (and maybe even right). Hunter, of course, was not a former president.
 
Don't whine and cry about Joe changing his mind, when Bonespur's most recognized trait is his incessant and never ending lying. 😂 Well that and his PARDONS for the convicted criminals Stone and Flynn. Again, can you even pronounce the word 'hypocritical ' ? So sad.
But Trump!!! You can't help yourself.

I always expected Joe to pardon Hunter. Joes is as big a POS as Trump.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Kelsers
But Trump!!! You can't help yourself.

I always expected Joe to pardon Hunter. Joes is as big a POS as Trump.
Of course But Trump. You can't whine and cry and shed fake tears over Hunter's pardon when your felon Bonespurs issued many more pardons for much worse crimes. But again... can you pronounce hypocritical?
 
Of course But Trump. You can't whine and cry and shed fake tears over Hunter's pardon when your felon Bonespurs issued many more pardons for much worse crimes. But again... can you pronounce hypocritical?
Is the reverse not also true? There are numerous posters here who criticize Trump multiple times a day, every day of every week, and yet will never under any circumstances levy even the mildest criticism against Biden. Not even when he does some of the same things as Trump.

By your own standard, is that not also hypocrisy?
 
  • Like
Reactions: WSC72
Is the reverse not also true? There are numerous posters here who criticize Trump multiple times a day, every day of every week, and yet will never under any circumstances levy even the mildest criticism against Biden. Not even when he does some of the same things as Trump.

By your own standard, is that not also hypocrisy?
Could be, if it were true. "Numerous posters" sounds like an exaggeration to me. Vs routine from the right.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: NoWokeBloke
Could be, if it were true. "Numerous posters" sounds like an exaggeration to me. Vs routine from the right.
You would be hard-pressed to find any examples of Huey criticizing Biden. Or Chis. Or Tom Paris or Belem.

I’m sure there are others if I give it a little more thought. How many do I need to count as ‘numerous’?
 
Last edited:
You would be hard-pressed to find any examples of Huey criticizing Biden. Or Chis. Or Tom Paris or Belem.

I’m sure there are other if I give it a little more thought. How many do I need to count as ‘numerous’?
Well, maybe. I'll let them defend themselves.

When I read comments like yours, I tend to feel that I'm among those targeted. But I try very hard to apply the same standards to my side.
 
Well, maybe. I'll let them defend themselves.

When I read comments like yours, I tend to feel that I'm among those targeted. But I try very hard to apply the same standards to my side.
Actually I wasn’t implying you at all. You’ve never been averse to calling out Dems when you feel it’s warranted. For as much as we often disagree, I’ve always respected that about you.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT