the overlove of Joe T on this site is insane
it gives people something to be outraged about
and now I am outraged with all of the outrage.
the overlove of Joe T on this site is insane
The answer is it depends how Ulis develops and how well Bowen steps up. Ulis and Toussaint were somewhat redundant in terms of their skill sets, so if Ulis can successfully fill that JT role, the Hawks will be ok.So the question is whether or not the benefits we experienced this year by moving Toussaint to the bench are worth more or less than the benefits we would have experienced by having Toussaint on the roster next year. I honestly don’t know the answer.
This exactly. I'm sure he lost all trust in the coaching staff based on the past two years. He was told he was going to be the guy and then wasn't. A fresh start is probably best.And lost his starting point guard position for the second time. If I were Joe I wouldn't have any confidence that I'd be starting especially if Connor's coming back.
Luckily nobody gives a flying **** about your feelings!it gives people something to be outraged about
and now I am outraged with all of the outrage.
I don’t think there’s much of a why to disagree on. Joe T was flashy and quick, but he was a turnover liability and a below average shooter. What he did excel at is defense, which I felt separated him from the other pg options Iowa had.
I understand why Fran benched him. Joe T is an average P5 player. My contention, in terms of the fair shake, is the other option Fran favored over him—and extended a lot of grace to—was not better in terms of overall productivity. Perhaps there will be where our disagreement lies.
I may have reacted poorly.. he's just my favorite player who i felt never got a fair chance to work through his deficiencies. Very disappointed.. time for a few beers
It's Iowa so probably not.....Sure hope the recruits this fall can step in quickly and capably.
Luckily nobody gives a flying **** about your feelings!
Yea sorry. I get a little emotionalyikes.
I always said Joe never passed the eyeball test for me. Strange dribbling, odd decision making and always seemed out of control. He'll do great at a mid major team where he plays top dog.
These are all excellent points. And I agree the right move was made this season. However, I’m talking about Joe T’s entire Iowa career. I don’t believe he was ever given the opportunity to reach his full potential, and who knows what that could have been. In terms of his value to the team, it’s kind of a moot point, because Joe T is an average P5 talent. Could he have been more? We’ll never know.You can't look at overall productivity between 2 players in a vacuum. The productivity that mattered was wins and losses. Fran built a team around his best player, Keegan. What Keegan needed was space and to not be doubled. Jbo had to be on the court for this to happen because of his shooting. Had to be. Pairing Jbo with JoeT was not effective because you had 2 small guards and Joe T did as much bad as good. So when Perkins came in and showed he could shoot, that allowed a nucleus of Keegan, Jbo, and Perk with very close behind those 3 of Kris and PMac. All cam shoot, all take care of the ball. Rebraca had a role as well as Joe T. But bottoming, no Jbo=no NCAA and no B1G title.
I would assume so. As you pointed out the half court offense just died when he ran the point.and that's why he lost his starting job, correct?
His shooting percentage from the perimeter (29% or lower each year from three) should cause him to be concerned about his starting spot. But no question it would have been his job to run with (again) this upcoming senior season, as he was going to start game 1. And Connor is not playing point next season. He will bring the ball up at times when we need a steady 24 year old hand who doesn't turn it over.And lost his starting point guard position for the second time. If I were Joe I wouldn't have any confidence that I'd be starting especially if Connor's coming back.
I would assume so. As you pointed out the half court offense just died when he ran the point.
Or most people only value offense , and don’t understand why some think defense is so important .the overlove of Joe T on this site is insane
Ulis' offensive game is far below JT's.The answer is it depends how Ulis develops and how well Bowen steps up. Ulis and Toussaint were somewhat redundant in terms of their skill sets, so if Ulis can successfully fill that JT role, the Hawks will be ok.
Agreed, pretty much sums it up. Unreal competitor and brought desperately needed extra juice to the team, but poor perimeter shooting and over-penetration meant his ceiling was fairly low. Joe knew what next year was going to bring for him minutes-wise, and he wanted more, which makes complete sense.So, Joe was one of my favorite players for a lot of reasons. (I won't list them all) 1) He played really hard, hustled, one of my favorite qualities in an athlete. 2) His team attitude...unreal how well he took the loss of the starting position and was still a team player. 3) Just seemed like a really likeable and humble kid.....I will miss him injecting energy into a game. I am also a supporter of Fran, but I did feel like Joe had the shortest leash and it stood out to me.
All that said, I'm and optimist about our players and I can usually see their upside, how they are capable of playing. I had a hard time seeing Joe take the necessary step forward for next year. He had worked on and improved his shot, but it still wasn't there. He had plenty of opportunities to run the team on the offensive end and could never get the flow going amidst worries of turnovers.
As much as I hate our guys leaving, maybe it's best for both Joe and the team to get a fresh start?
I don't know about far below, but agreed it's less as of today. He's had one less year to develop though. As discussed at end of the season, he needs to rediscover his confidence and shoot 74898394543 shots this off-season. With some improvement he can be a wash in terms of roster composition for JT next year.Ulis' offensive game is far below JT's.
IMO he got jerked around by FMPrior to 2021 season: "It's Joe T's team to run this year."
Mid 2021 season: "Yeah we are going to go ahead and bench you and not play you hardly at all."
Fans: "I'm just flabbergasted that he would transfer!"
Sorry to see Joe leave because of his hustle and toughness. But, he was a below average PG for a P5 team and a way below average PG for a top 25 team. Some of you guys seriously overrated him if you think Fran mistakenly ran him off. I think Joe wants to have a larger role, but that’s not going to be on a to 5 B1G teamAnyone with a brain could see this one coming….thanks Fran. Maybe if we miss the tourney next year you will be off the hook for another tourney failure…
as soon as he was benched( and he still got significant playing time) Iowa went from a team going nowhere but mediocrity to one of the hottest teams in the country. Fran did the right thing obviously since it worked, Joe was a hustle guy and a good teammate, but he proved he was not a starting caliber PG on a good team.Prior to 2021 season: "It's Joe T's team to run this year."
Mid 2021 season: "Yeah we are going to go ahead and bench you and not play you hardly at all."
Fans: "I'm just flabbergasted that he would transfer!"
People focus on an occasional turnover like it’s worse than all the defensive lapses we see on the other side of the court out of a host of fran favorites. Guess what they aren’t. Defensive breakdowns give up more points than a turnover.On a team that lacked defense, losing possibly your best defender is rough. People complain about Joe T's offensive game. Sure, he was limited in his shooting ability and penetrated too deep at times but he wasn't a liability at all. Add in his defense and leadership and he was a positive on the court.
Problem is Fran only cares about offense.
You could put together a highlight reel of Joe T's best 25 assists and JoBo's best assist in 6 years wouldn't crack the list. Difference between aggressiveness and passiveness.The part that made Joe so hard to play was his poor decision making at times on the offensive end. I don't have any stats but I would say he led the team by far in turnovers per minutes played. Fran values players that don't turn it over. I loved his energy, this team needed this in a bad way, but not good enough offensively. He also found himself penetrating too deep and finding nowhere to go, and that is not Frans offense.