Law enforcement. More signage. Not complicated
Law enforcement is extremely expensive and signage does nothing.
I’m 100% fine with this. Quite frankly I think there should be a lot more of them.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Law enforcement. More signage. Not complicated
they aren't constituionalLaw enforcement is extremely expensive and signage does nothing.
I’m 100% fine with this. Quite frankly I think there should be a lot more of them.
Would you also like cameras at every red light and stop sign? Maybe all cars to have an interlock device before people can drive? Is there any limit to your ideal surveillance state?Law enforcement is extremely expensive and signage does nothing.
I’m 100% fine with this. Quite frankly I think there should be a lot more of them.
cedar rapids speed/stop light cameras were for money and not safety when they didn’t put any in school zones. There was a kid a number of years back just down the road from Erskine Elementary in Cedar Rapids that got hit by a driver walking from schoolWould you also like cameras at every red light and stop sign? Maybe all cars to have an interlock device before people can drive? Is there any limit to your ideal surveillance state?
Cameras are going up in Milwaukee area around every Intersection. Supposedly for crash scene investigation purposes. We do have issues with reckless driving here. My guess is eventually traffic citations will get added to camera.Would you also like cameras at every red light and stop sign? Maybe all cars to have an interlock device before people can drive? Is there any limit to your ideal surveillance state?
It's going to feel a lot more like China or Russia here in another 20 years. Maybe they can add microphones to the cameras, so if they catch you criticizing the government, it's easier to lock you up.Cameras are going up in Milwaukee area around every Intersection. Supposedly for crash scene investigation purposes. We do have issues with reckless driving here. My guess is eventually traffic citations will get added to camera.
Between Ring devices, security cameras, cell phones, now intersection cameras. Will almost always be on camera in the Milwaukee area.It's going to feel a lot more like China or Russia here in another 20 years. Maybe they can add microphones to the cameras, so if they catch you criticizing the government, it's easier to lock you up.
Quite a difference between private property, or companies offering services you can opt in or out of, and the government generally surveilling all public areas for 'crimes' they might not otherwise see. So they can be enforced by technology instead of people.Between Ring devices, security cameras, cell phones, now intersection cameras. That will almost always be on camera in the Milwaukee area.
Big fan of these. More automated speed enforcement please.Can't find an online KCCI link. Attached is an article from the Newton paper.
Council approves contract to install speed cameras on I-80 near Newton
Equipment could reduce accidents but will most certainly bring more revenuewww.newtondailynews.com
Understand, but I’m just assuming from now forward. I’m tracked no matter what. Between that and our cell phone data. There is zero privacy anymore once u step outside.Quite a difference between private property, or companies offering services you can opt in or out of, and the government generally surveilling all public areas for 'crimes' they might not otherwise see. So they can be enforced by technology instead of people.
Hell yeah. As many red lights as I see people blow through on my way to work. I'd love this.Would you also like cameras at every red light and stop sign? Maybe all cars to have an interlock device before people can drive? Is there any limit to your ideal surveillance state?
It's a civil fine, much like a parking ticket.Therein lies the rub. In our justice system the burden of proof is on the government, not the accused. Now if the government wants to put in the effort to make the case, beyond a reasonable doubt, that they know the identity of the driver, then I'm good with it. Otherwise, if they didn't identify the driver of the vehicle and the owner pleads not guilty, then I don't think that the government has a provable case.
OkIt's going to feel a lot more like China or Russia here in another 20 years. Maybe they can add microphones to the cameras, so if they catch you criticizing the government, it's easier to lock you up.
My issue is reckless passing in Milwaukee. They’ll use the bus only lane or what is essentially a parking lane if it’s not being used. So I see the need.Hell yeah. As many red lights as I see people blow through on my way to work. I'd love this.
You have a right to privacy in your home. that's itQuite a difference between private property, or companies offering services you can opt in or out of, and the government generally surveilling all public areas for 'crimes' they might not otherwise see. So they can be enforced by technology instead of people.
Understand, but I’m just assuming from now forward. I’m tracked no matter what. Between that and our cell phone data. There is zero privacy anymore once u step outside.
Eventually, people slow down I assume and the ticket revenue dries up. The fact that they make so much money shows just how many people were speeding.I know a lot of folks who have received tickets since last fall from the cameras installed on Hwy. 20 at Webster City. Making so much money it was only a matter of time before every city on a highway or interstate tries to get their piece. If you're a small town like Shelby on I-80 or Owasa on Hwy. 20, get that cash while you can.
You can dispute itI’ve been ticketed when not driving. Seems pretty unconstitutional. I thought that’s why we had to sign the ticket when stopped
If you have a state tax return they just deduct it out of that. Happened to me on one my daughter got that I wasn't aware of.Everyone should stop paying them.
According to a former co-worker who is a PT PC policeman, he told me the “trip” has always been 11 mph on #163 there…. Now the camera they have “in town”, I don’t know what that is “tripped” at…but a year ago or so KCCI did a rather lengthy story on the speed cams in Prairie City.It has probably changed now (although Prairie City makes more from speed can’t than from property taxes) but theirs started out with almost no leeway.
These cameras aren't catching locals after awhile. They learn where they can speed and where they can't.Eventually, people slow down I assume and the ticket revenue dries up. The fact that they make so much money shows just how many people were speeding.
And the next time they go through, they'll slow down.These cameras aren't catching locals after awhile. They learn where they can speed and where they can't.
The cameras are catching people from out of town. It's not changing their behavior, other than they'll always remember and hate the town that sent them the ticket in the mail weeks later.
They won't ever want to come back through if they can help it.And the next time they go through, they'll slow down.
So they'll avoid I80 instead of slowing down to 81mph? Actually I'm ok with them staying off the road then.They won't ever want to come back through if they can help it.
I always pictured him as the cop that is like "hey i saw you doing some dumb shit, knock it off before i have to do something about it."
One one hand I mostly agree. On the other, I wish Omaha would install some sort of way to get people to chill the f*ck out on the interstates. If they can't get troopers to do it, then what?I guess at the end of the day, I'd rather have troopers and deputies doing the actual work
If it were actually important to the department, they would police it. But, apparently it must not be a priority.One one hand I mostly agree. On the other, I wish Omaha would install some sort of way to get people to chill the f*ck out on the interstates. If they can't get troopers to do it, then what?
Why, there's more important work for those folks to be doing then stopping assholes that don't think the traffic laws apply to them.I guess at the end of the day, I'd rather have troopers and deputies doing the actual work
They stopped doing it in 2020 and keep saying they're going to start, but I rarely see someone pulled over on the interestates.If it were actually important to the department, they would police it. But, apparently it must not be a priority.
Eventually, people slow down I assume and the ticket revenue dries up. The fact that they make so much money shows just how many people were speeding.
According to a former co-worker who is a PT PC policeman, he told me the “trip” has always been 11 mph on #163 there…. Now the camera they have “in town”, I don’t know what that is “tripped” at…but a year ago or so KCCI did a rather lengthy story on the speed cams in Prairie City.
These cameras aren't catching locals after awhile. They learn where they can speed and where they can't.
The cameras are catching people from out of town. It's not changing their behavior, other than they'll always remember and hate the town that sent them the ticket in the mail weeks later.
That’ll teach’em!I'm committed to not doing business in any of these communities.
The ACLU director is entitled to his opinion, but he is factually wrong.Check out this video. It's a great watch on Prairie City. The 1:35 to 1:42 mark addresses your statement. He contends it doesn't make it safer because the tickets keep coming.
That’ll teach’em!