Like I said earlier.....let’s bookmark this thread for Selection Sunday.Lol, sure buddy. They'd be "possibly sneaking" into a 2 by winning out. You're nothing but a sock puppet for the absurd.
Like I said earlier.....let’s bookmark this thread for Selection Sunday.Lol, sure buddy. They'd be "possibly sneaking" into a 2 by winning out. You're nothing but a sock puppet for the absurd.
Fine with me. I don't see Iowa winning the BTT but you are your buddy will look foolish when Iowa is firmly on the 2 and possibly 1 line if they win out.Like I said earlier.....let’s bookmark this thread for Selection Sunday.
No. They will not win out.
You called Underscore stupid because he said Iowa isn’t a 2 seed. They’re not.
So in other words....he said they could still get a 2 seed.
Honestly, some of people are a real piece of work.
I agree let’s bookmark it! But we need to stick to the original points. IF Iowa wins today +1 more they’ll be no lower than a 3 seed. If they win today +2 more they’ll be a 2 seed.Like I said earlier.....let’s bookmark this thread for Selection Sunday.
I would agree with this. I can't see a #1 under the very best of circumstances, but reality tells me they'll end up a 4 at best given their current play.Honestly, the real piece of work is your reading comprehension. He clearly and unambiguously said if Iowa were to win out they would be at best a 3 seed. The potential for a 2 seed, in his view, was Iowa would have to win out plus have a bunch of other teams lose, and even then it would be iffy according to him. And that is absolutely ridiculous. Iowa has been ranked in the Top 10 the vast majority of the season. If they were to win out and win the conference tournament of the best conference in basketball this year, they would be a lock for a 2 seed regardless of what anyone else does. That's not even debatable.
I agree the 1 line is pretty dang set however if Iowa won out (and I’d be SHOCKED) they’d get it over OSU.. would likely have 10 quad 1 wins.I would agree with this. I can't see a #1 under the very best of circumstances, but reality tells me they'll end up a 4 at best given their current play.
I would agree with this. I can't see a #1 under the very best of circumstances, but reality tells me they'll end up a 4 at best given their current play.
I agree there’s not a huge win there. Again your last line around the “conversation for a 3 seed” is simply not accurate with how the committee works. When they released their top 16 Iowa was 13 in the midst of some struggles. Only loss is at Michigan since then. Iowa is absolutely in the conversation for a 3 seed and as a high as a 2 right now according to bracketologist.. They’ll certainly have to finish 3-2 down the stretch to stay on that 3 or higher but that’s doable.The title of this post made me think: What IS Iowa's signature win? At Wisconsin (8-8 in last 16 games)? North Carolina game looks a little better now, but Iowa SHOULD beat bubble teams at home. The MSU win @MSU will prove to be most impressive (and of course I envision a doomsday scenario where MSU keeps rolling and beats Iowa in BTT now!), but what marquee win does Iowa actually have? Honestly, If Iowa had no hype to start season, and say were ranked as borderline top-25 team, I don't think they're in conversation for top-3 seed, let alone ranked as high as they are.
You are outside of reality if you think Iowa could be a 2 seed. You would have to do research, look at actual bracketologists who are accurate, etc.
Except for at the end of the season the rent check comes due and they get scored.. that never happens with weathermen. So why not pay attention to the best ones we have instead of saying “I don’t feel like Iowa is a 2 seed”.. Not saying you are saying that but a few in this thread are.I've said this about bracketologists before and I'll say it again. They are like weathermen who get to keep revising their predictions until they finally get it right.
And I never once said Iowa wouldn’t be a 2 if they won out. Not once. But thanks for playing.Fine with me. I don't see Iowa winning the BTT but you are your buddy will look foolish when Iowa is firmly on the 2 and possibly 1 line if they win out.
You are the one with comprehension trouble. He clearly said Iowa could still be a 2 seed.Honestly, the real piece of work is your reading comprehension. He clearly and unambiguously said if Iowa were to win out they would be at best a 3 seed. The potential for a 2 seed, in his view, was Iowa would have to win out plus have a bunch of other teams lose, and even then it would be iffy according to him. And that is absolutely ridiculous. Iowa has been ranked in the Top 10 the vast majority of the season. If they were to win out and win the conference tournament of the best conference in basketball this year, they would be a lock for a 2 seed regardless of what anyone else does. That's not even debatable.
I agree wholeheartedly that Iowa is probably on the right side of a 3-seed currently. BUT, my point was in reference as to whether they would be had they not been hyped and ranked so high in the preseason? If they're pre-season 22 or 24 instead of top-5, are they, based on their resume of "decent" wins and bad losses (Minny and Indiana aren't making tourney), and overall poor non-conference strength of schedule, on the 3-seed? I don't think they would be.I agree there’s not a huge win there. Again your last line around the “conversation for a 3 seed” is simply not accurate with how the committee works. When they released their top 16 Iowa was 13 in the midst of some struggles. Only loss is at Michigan since then. Iowa is absolutely in the conversation for a 3 seed and as a high as a 2 right now according to bracketologist.. They’ll certainly have to finish 3-2 down the stretch to stay on that 3 or higher but that’s doable.
What do you think they are right now? I think most people agree they would need a massive win today to be a 2..And I never once said Iowa wouldn’t be a 2 if they won out. Not once. But thanks for playing.
I stated I didn’t think they would win out, and that they are not a 2 right now.
Oh come on. Let me have my fun.....So in other words....he said they could still get a 2 seed.
Honestly, some of people are a real piece of work.
I see what you’re saying. Committee doesn’t take any media poll into consideration when stack ranking teams. It’s solely done off their net profile. Warren Nolan is a great website to visit to see what they take into consideration. I agree they somewhat start there with pre season expectations but ultimately it comes down to metrics that are not based on polls.I agree wholeheartedly that Iowa is probably on the right side of a 3-seed currently. BUT, my point was in reference as to whether they would be had they not been hyped and ranked so high in the preseason? If they're pre-season 22 or 24 instead of top-5, are they, based on their resume of "decent" wins and bad losses (Minny and Indiana aren't making tourney), and overall poor non-conference strength of schedule, on the 3-seed? I don't think they would be.
But please let us know how seriously you're taking this. I don't think you've illustrated that quite well-enough yet.....Not thinking they can is being realistic. (Actually that's pessimism. But pessimists usually don't realize they're doing it until they're told......) They have losses since the initial 4 (and wins....), from the actual committee. And they have done nothing to move up since (Sure they have.). So one last time. (How about two last times?) Read and think. (You first...) Take your time, you can do it. (I already did. I've been waiting for you, slowpoke.)
You have too much fun as it is......Oh come on. Let me have my fun.....
Hmmmm......good question. Tough to say. I’d like to think a 3, but given the lack of real “signature” wins, it would not surprise me if they were a 4. But....its nothing but conjecture at this point.What do you think they are right now? I think most people agree they would need a massive win today to be a 2..
That’s fair then.. I was just going after the response that Iowa is “nowhere near a 2 seed right now” that the one person replied with.. that’s just simply not trueHmmmm......good question. Tough to say. I’d like to think a 3, but given the lack of real “signature” wins, it would not surprise me if they were a 4. But....its nothing but conjecture at this point.
So I would say a 3 or 4.
Meanwhile Nova getting run out of the gym by ButlerIowa will not, and does not even remotely deserve a 2 seed, no matter the result of this game or the rest of the season.
If Iowa were to win out AND, win the B1G tournament, AND, beat Michigan and or Illinois in the process, then maybe a 3 seed. Then, if other good teams with decent wins were to falter in the end, maybe they could sneak into a 2 seed. But even then, more likely a 3 is the ceiling at this point.
I was going to ask him what should happen to them if they lose this game? They’re on the 2-3 line right now. If he’s pissed about losses to top 5 teams I wonder how he feels about other teams getting run by top 130 teams..Meanwhile Nova getting run out of the gym by Butler
Hmmmm......good question. Tough to say. I’d like to think a 3, but given the lack of real “signature” wins, it would not surprise me if they were a 4. But....its nothing but conjecture at this point.
So I would say a 3 or 4.
Exaaaaactly. Like I said it doesn’t bother me if people don’t truly pay attention to how CBB works but when they pretend like they do talking about AP rankings and Iowa sucks.. dumbLets compare some of the teams on the 2/3 line and see their top 2 'signature wins.' I'm going to leave out Ohio State and Illinois currently as they are on the 1/2 lines and I would argue clearly ahead of Iowa.
I'm going to use net ranking. Then I will put their quad 1 record. I'm using teams that with bracket matrix are on the 2/3 line. If you have a team that is more deserving than the ones listed I would like to know.
Houston (net ranking 4)-Best wins. Texas Tech #15/ SMU #56. quad 1 record 2-1
Alabama(net ranking 9) - Best wins. Arkansas #19/Tennessee #22 quad 1 record 7-4
Villanova(net ranking 8)- Best wins. Texas #27/ U-Conn #36. quad 1 record 2-3
West Virginia (net ranking 12)-Best wins. Kansas #11/Texas Tech #15. quad 1 record 6-6
Iowa (net ranking 6)-Best wins. Purdue #21/Wisconsin #23. quad 1 record 5-6
Exaaaaactly. Like I said it doesn’t bother me if people don’t truly pay attention to how CBB works but when they pretend like they do talking about AP rankings and Iowa sucks.. dumb
Let me get this straight.
We're ranked #9 in the country, and in a lot of metric rankings, some of which influence seeding, even higher; numerous teams around our ranking are losing games; and people think if we win out, which would include probably three top 10 wins, that we wouldn't be a 2 seed?
Let me get this straight.
We're ranked #9 in the country, and in a lot of metric rankings, some of which influence seeding, even higher; numerous teams around our ranking are losing games; and people think if we win out, which would include probably three top 10 wins, that we wouldn't be a 2 seed?
I agree! I think a win is unlikely, would be an awesome one to get.That being said today's game is huuuuuge. I'm not extremely confident because as a Hawk fan I'm used to being let down. But I've been surprised/wrong before and would love to get a big win today!
You are the one with comprehension trouble. He clearly said Iowa could still be a 2 seed.