Do you live in your parents basement? Is the truth your phone app burner account?you and Bleeder are something else, I will give that much to you.....
i would be embarrassed to have as many posts as you so I’d do a burner too.
Do you live in your parents basement? Is the truth your phone app burner account?you and Bleeder are something else, I will give that much to you.....
Why is everyone so mad that we are having a discussion about who should start and get minutes? Yes we are winning. Yes it's great. That doesn't mean we can't discuss what we think will make the team even better.I guess nit picking minutes is all that’s left when a team has won 5/6, all the wins by DD, with 3 wins by 20+ points.
For me it’s a game by game thing. Ke Murray will always be around 30. The rest ebb and flow based on matchups and game flow.
It feels like Fran has settled into a nice rotation. The players have responded positively. And that really quirky, shake your head kind of line ups have pretty much disappeared.
Sometimes you get the vibe from players when they’re unhappy with minutes or their role. If that’s the case, I haven’t seen one bit of evidence that’s the case this year.
All the players seem engaged and really playing together as a team. I wouldn’t say that they have defined roles but they know what skills they bring to the table.
so you are saying he NEVER ONCE mentioned it and never once mentioned Fentanyl Floyd being black in what should have been a sports article?I'm pretty indifferent on Leistikow but that's not anywhere near the realm of truthful. But carry on being a fragile drama queen if you must
You may want to review your postso you are saying he NEVER ONCE mentioned it and never once mentioned Fentanyl Floyd being black in what should have been a sports article?
The nerve of you, interrupting a lovers spat!How about them Hawkeyes!! Amirite!
this generation fails to understand sarcasm I seeYou may want to review your post
‘exactly, he couldn't puke out one article during the football season without mentioning race’
that would mean you said he did it in every article. Not ‘never once’.
Wow, you look really smart using couldn’t puke out one then going with NEVER ONCE when called on your fabrication.this generation fails to understand sarcasm I see
I see the soy boy is triggeredWow, you look really smart using couldn’t puke out one then going with NEVER ONCE when called on your fabrication.
That is probably a far better use of sarcasm than what you attempted. You may want to brush up on what sarcasm is as well.
Definitely. When you can’t support your post with substance you cast aspersions. Fully prepared for your ‘snowflake’ response next. Let me know when you learn to use and recognize sarcasm properly.I see the soy boy is triggered
Apparently, Matt Painter doesn’t know what he is doing either when he doesn’t start Trevion Williams(All Big Ten last year)!
Are you saying that being on the ALL-FRESHMAN team is better than being ALL BIG 10?I guess this is why
ALL-FRESHMAN TEAM
Andre Curbelo, Illinois
Keegan Murray, Iowa
Hunter Dickinson, Michigan
Zach Edey, Purdue
Jaden Ivey, Purdue
Most people are laughing at you.Keep spinning. Keep the insults coming. The rest of us will just laugh at you and shake our heads.
You really are something else. I though Chis was bad on the Off Topic board with his nonsense. You are close to catching him.
I'm not sure what point is trying to be made by who here but Zach Edey has the highest PER in all of college basketball ahead of you know who. I'm guessing he knows what he's doing by starting Edey ahead of Williams. They both play the same minutes anyway.D Blade said:
Apparently, Matt Painter doesn’t know what he is doing either when he doesn’t start Trevion Williams(All Big Ten last year)!
Are you saying that being on the ALL-FRESHMAN team is better than being ALL BIG 10?
That's a relevant point. That he was all-freshmen wasn't.I'm not sure what point is trying to be made by who here but Zach Edey has the highest PER in all of college basketball ahead of you know who. I'm guessing he knows what he's doing by starting Edey ahead of Williams. They both play the same minutes anyway.
2022-23 Hollinger Player Statistics - ESPN
ESPN's John Hollinger ranks the NCAA's players with his exclusive PER formula.insider.espn.com
Starting, not starting isn't all that important. It's always about minutes and who is getting the most minutes. Your best players should play more. Period.Kris definitely could have started on last years team.. his take on coming off the bench and the second unit being able to keep a great deal of pressure on the other team is what a good team mate says that isn’t starting and has accepted his current role.. it was the right thing to say and mature..
I will say Fran made tough decisions about starting Perkins (and playing him more), and putting Joe T on the bench. It was absolutely the right move and kudos to Fran for seeing it. There wasn't a lot about Perkins' play prior to Fran doing that to indicate he should start. But it improved the team in two areas, put the ball in Bohannon's hands to make him more effective and allowed Perkins to blossom as a scoring, physical guard.
In the 2022 season, Kr. Murray averaged 5.5 fouls per 40 minutes. In 2020-21, Keeg. Murray averaged 4.3 fouls per 40 minutes. Keegan's fouls per 40 dropped to 2.4 in 2021-22. He definitely got better about not challenging everything and once he became great he definitely got calls from Big 10 refs. I would guess Kris Murray will see a similar arc on the fouls. Less challenging/reaching, and more respect from refs if he is a really good player.One thing is for sure, kris has to stop the fouls or it won't matter if he starts or not.
If not we will be hearing about Frans foul strategy in every other post on here!
Agree that that jury is still out on Perkins. In his last 9 games, he averaged 11.4 points, made 30-57 2 pointers, 9-19 3-pointers, 38 rebounds, 10 steals, 25 assists. Toussaint has never had a 9-game stretch approaching that level of consistency with 3 years on the Iowa roster.I hope you're right about this. It certainly resulted in the departure of Joe T. Remains to be seen as to whether it resulted in Perkins taking a big step as a scoring guard, in my opinion.
This... Hopefully not playing the 5 will help with some of the fouls he got battling with bigger guys.One thing is for sure, kris has to stop the fouls or it won't matter if he starts or not.
If not we will be hearing about Frans foul strategy in every other post on here!
Joe T was making progress...fewer turnovers and hitting some shots..BUT in this lay person's view the offense just did not flow with him as the PG. I don't claim any expertise, I don't know what evidence to cite to support that assertion, it just is what it looked like to me as someone who is not that knowledgeable about how a PG running Fran's offense should look, that when JBO was in the game the offense generally looked better.
That said, I wish Joe T had stayed...and wish him the best. He seemed like a great kid and a great teammate.
That’s some great stuff!People will always complain about who should start and how many minutes everyone should play. When Fran moved JBo back to starting PG and Tony to the starting shooting guard there was a lot of complaining on here. But that move had a huge impact. Iowa was 12-2 over it's last 14 games heading into the NCAA Tournament so I think it's pretty clear Fran was pushing the right buttons heading into the NCAA Tournament.
8-2 -- last 10 games of the Regular Season
4-0 -- in the B1G Tournament, resulting in a B1G Tournament Championship
And Iowa would not have not been in the Richmond game if not for PMac. PMac was 4-7 from 3 and was the 2nd leading scorer in that game (18 points). The rest of the team was 2-22 (9%) from 3. Kris and Keegan were a combined 0-8 from 3.
2 Pt..3 Pt..Total
FG.....FG....FG....FTs...Pts...Reb...TO's...Min
8-12...0-3....8-15...5-5......21.......9........2.....38.....Keegan
3-10...4-7....7-17....0-0.....18......2........0......25.....PMac
1-1......0-5.....1-6.....1-2.......3.......5........0......16......Kris
0-1.....2-7.....2-8....0-0......6.......2.........1......33.....JBo
2-3.....0-2.....2-5....2-3.......6.......1.........3......19......Tony
2-5....0-0.....2-5.....1-2.......5......9.........0......25.....Filip
1-2.....0-3.....1-5.....0-0......2......3.........0........8.....Payton
1-3....0-0.....1-3.....0-0......2.......1..........1.......13.....JoeT
0-0...0-2....0-2.....0-0......0......3.........2......23......Connor
Joe T might have been....though Tony P seemed pretty good as well. That said JBO will no longer be defending, and I think the guys likely to take his place could/should be quite a bit better defenders just based on size and athleticism. Overall I think a pretty good upgrade on the defensive end of the floor....does that mitigate the loss of Joe T on that end?I think we will find out if the offensive success had more to do with JBo at the point or Perkins getting minutes instead of Joe T.
The offensive numbers bear out that the lineup down the stretch worked better on offense but was it due to Perkins or due to JBo at the point?
The other thing that always gets lost in this discussion is the other end of the floor. Joe T was our best perimeter defender by a good margin.
I don't disagree with any of that. I just wish we still had Joe T. That would allow the incoming freshman some playing time but not necessitate them being vital. Freshman guards often struggle a bit in the Big Ten.Joe T might have been....though Tony P seemed pretty good as well. That said JBO will no longer be defending, and I think the guys likely to take his place could/should be quite a bit better defenders just based on size and athleticism. Overall I think a pretty good upgrade on the defensive end of the floor....does that mitigate the loss of Joe T on that end?
I would add that I think JBO actually turned up the defensive effort and was better on that end of the floor his final year. He was a great Hawk.
Our backcourt should be PG: 6' 2/3" and 2G 6' 4/5" and fairly athletic.....that should help in defending the 3 and hopefully limiting penetration.