We can not blame all Muslims for the acts of a demented few----they can blame millions and millions of law abiding gun owners for the acts of a demented few. If they really gave a crap about lives- how about the 57 million babies killed since 1973.
We can not blame all Muslims for the acts of a demented few----they can blame millions and millions of law abiding gun owners for the acts of a demented few. If they really gave a crap about lives- how about the 57 million babies killed since 1973.
I missed it. Where was the good point?He brings up a valid point, cig.
I missed it. Where was the good point?
OK, if you think that's a good point, you must also think the reverse is a good point, right? You blame Islam while wanting to hold gun owners blameless. That seems like a problem for you. A problem that gets compounded when you realise libs don't blame gun owners, but rather the easy availability of guns. It's the product, not the people gun control advocates want to restrict. A point I'm surprised you even missed as pro gun people love to shout "guns don't kill people, people kill people" which should clue you into the gun focus over the gun owner focus of the debate.Blaming Muslims is wrong, but blaming gun owners is okay.
OK, if you think that's a good point, you must also think the reverse is a good point, right? You blame Islam while wanting to hold gun owners blameless. That seems like a problem for you. A problem that gets compounded when you realise libs don't blame gun owners, but rather the easy availability of guns. It's the product, not the people gun control advocates want to restrict. A point I'm surprised you even missed as pro gun people love to shout "guns don't kill people, people kill people" which should clue you into the gun focus over the gun owner focus of the debate.
So where was that good point again?
OK, that logic applies to gun owners too right?I don't blame Islam. I don't want to impose on Muslims. But extra scrutiny is just a rational thing to do when there's a subset trying to kill you.
I don't blame Islam. I don't want to impose on Muslims. But extra scrutiny is just a rational thing to do when there's a subset trying to kill you.
You have a very poor understanding of liberal logic
OK, that logic applies to gun owners too right?
And we could say that about the Syrian Refugees too, but you want even more extra scrutiny. Your muslim logic is very close to the gun control logic.We already have extra scrutiny.
That brilliantly nukes liberal logicI smell a meme thread...
![]()
And we could say that about the Syrian Refugees too, but you want even more extra scrutiny. Your muslim logic is very close to the gun control logic.
I don't know about that. Is there really extra scrutiny on someone from Syria vs. someone from Norway or New Zealand?
We can not blame all Muslims for the acts of a demented few----they can blame millions and millions of law abiding gun owners for the acts of a demented few. If they really gave a crap about lives- how about the 57 million babies killed since 1973.
6 shooter vs a semi-automatic gun.
There are restrictions on criminals who want to immigrate here too. Just as there are stricter regulations on the refugees than there are on a random Norwegian who wants to move here.And you know what else? Entire swaths of people are prohibited from owning guns because they committed a crime, or they were Baker Acted, or they were convicted abusers of alcohol or drugs.
Is there something similar with immigrants?
Way to deflect....you whiffed again.You have a very poor understanding of liberal logic, but that's pretty predictable, as you seem to have a pretty poor understanding about the world around you as a whole.
I'm trying to understand how this would work. Does the gun somehow break the bullet into pieces so that it can hit multiple targets? And what is that graph showing me?the Liberal understanding of guns...
![]()
OK, that logic applies to gun owners too right?
I'm trying to understand how this would work. Does the gun somehow break the bullet into pieces so that it can hit multiple targets? And what is that graph showing me?
Blaming Muslims is wrong, but blaming gun owners is okay.
as well as the availability of assault rifles that serve no legitimate sporting or defense purpose...
You're doing it wrong:You've never been coyote hunting in SW Iowa.
It's showing us that the people most concerned about gun control don't know anything about guns. But those who don't know anything about guns wouldn't understand that.I'm trying to understand how this would work. Does the gun somehow break the bullet into pieces so that it can hit multiple targets? And what is that graph showing me?
This is pretty in line with gun debate as well.
OK, that logic applies to gun owners too right?
Ah, but people who kill with guns do kill because of their gunismism. It's a related condition.Not really. People who own guns don't want to kill someone simply because they own a gun. But when Muslims want to kill someone...it's because of their Muslimismism.
Ah, but people who kill with guns do kill because of their gunismism. It's a related condition.
How about you detail your statement here. You'd actually get some respect if you didn't just pop off and not explain your reasoning.You have a very poor understanding of liberal logic, but that's pretty predictable, as you seem to have a pretty poor understanding about the world around you as a whole.
I bet cars and the flu killed even more.Knives killed 5 times as many people in 2014 as rifles. So, not really. Are you a knife owner?
I bet cars and the flu killed even more.
We already have extra scrutiny.
Knives killed 5 times as many people in 2014 as rifles. So, not really. Are you a knife owner?