James Daniels refers to some stats about player retention. Did he get these numbers ahead of time from rob howe?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Grad rates are on the players. The academic help provided for these players is incredible. If a player doesn’t graduate, they need to look in the mirror. Skin color makes no difference. This “Victim Card” is getting ridiculous. Go to YouTube and search for Dr. Shelby Steele or Burgess Owens and listen. These black players that consider themselves victims should definitely listen. And yes, this is Burgess Owens the former NFL Star.James Daniels refers to some stats about player retention. Did he get these numbers ahead of time from rob howe?
What’s interesting about the twitter ban is that the seniors that year were the ones that told KF to keep it in place.From the sounds of it, all of the coaches were also focused on those same statistics and it was no secret in the program that they were trying to fix it as early as 2017. They set up a diversity task force and KF was regularly meeting with the black players on the team about this. Lomax had some sort of advisory role.
Unfortunately I didn’t hear any concrete changes that came from those meetings, although I believe they said KF was considering letting up on the twitter ban as a result. I think that probably at least partly explains why James Daniels felt like he needed to go to Twitter with his complaints. The real painful changes weren’t going to happen (or were going to take many years) doing things that way. In comparison, look at how many changes have been implemented in just a few weeks doing things this way.
That’s interesting, I missed that part. That’s definitely an interesting twist to this story.What’s interesting about the twitter ban is that the seniors that year were the ones that told KF to keep it in place.
They might not have said it in this one can’t remember. But Ward has mentioned it several times prior because he was a captain that year.That’s interesting, I missed that part. That’s definitely an interesting twist to this story.
Unfortunately I didn’t hear any concrete changes that came from those meetings, although I believe they said KF was considering letting up on the twitter ban as a result
We ain't come here to play school!!Grad rates are on the players. The academic help provided for these players is incredible. If a player doesn’t graduate, they need to look in the mirror. Skin color makes no difference. This “Victim Card” is getting ridiculous. Go to YouTube and search for Dr. Shelby Steele or Burgess Owens and listen. These black players that consider themselves victims should definitely listen. And yes, this is Burgess Owens the former NFL Star.
Yeah, I don’t doubt it. I guess the counter argument is so many of the players that were upset had already left the program so they weren’t around to vote as seniors. I think the twitter thing was bound to change once players start getting paid for sponsored tweets so that policy was going to die soon no matter what.They might not have said it in this one can’t remember. But Ward has mentioned it several times prior because he was a captain that year.
Btw dmps says around 16% of black boys in high school get a "b" or better in algebra 1. Their "goal" is about 1/4 of them.James Daniels refers to some stats about player retention. Did he get these numbers ahead of time from rob howe?
Actually now that I’ve thought about it more I believe I heard something about making sure more black players get to be captain and get chosen to go to Chicago for media day, etc. So I think there were more concrete changes already implemented than I initially remembered. I thought the WuW comments on captains were interesting. Sort of implied that before these changes the captains had supposedly been decided by an anonymous vote of the players but the results sometimes made the players question if the coaches put their finger on the scale to get the results they wanted. I assume that has now been changed for the better.I can't speak to specific changes after the 2017 meetings, but it does seem like the program is retaining black players at a much higher rate since those meeings. I believe our strong core of young black coaches (Copeland, Woods, Bell, Foster) has a lot to do with that.
Player retention is the first step towards higher graduation rates.
So certain colored players need a guaranteed representative because either the coaches or others players are racist?Actually now that I’ve thought about it more I believe I heard something about making sure more black players get to be captain and get chosen to go to Chicago for media day, etc. So I think there were more concrete changes already implemented than I initially remembered. I thought the WuW comments on captains were interesting. Sort of implied that before these changes the captains had supposedly been decided by an anonymous vote of the players but the results sometimes made the players question if the coaches put their finger on the scale to get the results they wanted. I assume that has now been changed for the better.
So certain colored players need a guaranteed representative because either the coaches or others players are racist?
My interpretation - and anyone else that listened can correct me if you think I heard it wrong - is that there were times when one of the captains would end up being some white kid that nobody had voted for but that the coaches must have liked because he fit their image of the Iowa try-hard football player. It wasn’t implied that he was chosen because he’s white, it just happens that most of our walkons that have to try to our-effort everyone tend to be white because of the demographics of the state.So certain colored players need a guaranteed representative because either the coaches or others players are racist?
Don't get me started on that crap. White and brown are colors too!Colored? Did you just get here from 1960? Jesus...
So players of certain color need a guaranteed representative because either the coaches or others players are racist?Colored? Did you just get here from 1960? Jesus...
Don't get me started on that crap. White and brown are colors too!
2nd of all there is no damn difference between what I said and this stupid bullshit "person of color" crap that is "acceptable" to say!
Grad rates are on the players. The academic help provided for these players is incredible. If a player doesn’t graduate, they need to look in the mirror. Skin color makes no difference. This “Victim Card” is getting ridiculous. Go to YouTube and search for Dr. Shelby Steele or Burgess Owens and listen. These black players that consider themselves victims should definitely listen. And yes, this is Burgess Owens the former NFL Star.
White is a color you moron! White people ARE colored you tool....So it's cool you refer to all non Caucasian people as colored? It's literally a term that hasn't been used in at least 30 years, if not 40, and even then was derogatory.
You can't be serious, right?
White is a color you moron! White people ARE colored you tool....
And say white not Caucasian
To be clear I laugh at people who say "people of color"...however it is perfectly acceptable these days. At least to the masses.So it's cool you refer to all non Caucasian people as colored? It's literally a term that hasn't been used in at least 30 years, if not 40, and even then was derogatory.
You can't be serious, right?
Dude why don't you go search "people of color" under Google news. You'll see CBS Fox news Washington Post etc using the term. I don't make the rules so don't bitch at me. all I said was black is a color. If you disagree so be it I'm done with this.....I mean if you want to be scientifically correct white isn't a color but I digress...
Do you really think there's nothing wrong, or at least no legitimate stigma, with referring to any minority as "colored"?
And no, saying a "person of color" is not the same or better because even by your own, misguided, definition that would mean every person. So why would saying "colored" or "person of color" be necessary if every person falls into that definition and therefore there's no need to distinguish between any certain "color"?
I think you misread his post. He wasn’t calling black players “colored.” He was referring to the skin color of all the football players, and suggesting players of a certain color shouldn’t be guaranteed representationSo it's cool you refer to all non Caucasian people as colored? It's literally a term that hasn't been used in at least 30 years, if not 40, and even then was derogatory.
You can't be serious, right?
Just curious if using skin color isn't ok....how do you classify a dark Hispanic like Jorge Soler? Other than American how would you classify him... Of course that's even if he classifies himself as American.I mean if you want to be scientifically correct white isn't a color but I digress...
Do you really think there's nothing wrong, or at least no legitimate stigma, with referring to any minority as "colored"?
And no, saying a "person of color" is not the same or better because even by your own, misguided, definition that would mean every person. So why would saying "colored" or "person of color" be necessary if every person falls into that definition and therefore there's no need to distinguish between any certain "color"?
Dude why don't you go search "people of color" under Google news. You'll see CBS Fox news Washington Post etc using the term. I don't make the rules so don't bitch at me all I said was black is a color. If you disagree so be it I'm done with this.....
Thanks. And bottom line nothing about the decision screams equality. Fake forced equality maybe but not true equality.I think you misread his post. He wasn’t calling black players “colored.” He was referring to the skin color of all the football players, and suggesting players of a certain color shouldn’t be guaranteed representation
Don’t agree at all with the take, given Iowa’s and Iowa City’s demographics in contrast with the demographics of the football team, but also don’t think the comment was racist or anything like that
Just curious if using skin color isn't ok....how do you classify a dark Hispanic like Jorge Soler? Other than American how would you classify him... Of course that's even if he classifies himself as American.
We don't classify everyone by their original nationality get real. Is he Hispanic American (even though most just say Hispanic) or African American? how many people you call Kenyan American or Egyptian AmericanBy where he's from and not how he looks. He'sCHe's or Cuban American if he has citizenship, how do you identify him?
I think you misread his post. He wasn’t calling black players “colored.” He was referring to the skin color of all the football players, and suggesting players of a certain color shouldn’t be guaranteed representation
Don’t agree at all with the take, given Iowa’s and Iowa City’s demographics in contrast with the demographics of the football team, but also don’t think the comment was racist or anything like that
We don't classify everyone by their original nationality get real. Is he Hispanic or African American to you? how many people you call Kenyon American or Egyptian American
James Daniels refers to some stats about player retention. Did he get these numbers ahead of time from rob howe?
We don't classify everyone by their original nationality get real. Is he Hispanic or African American to you? how many people you call Kenyon American or Egyptian American
What the hell are you talking about? Hell black lives matter talks about the color of ****ing skin dude. This is completely pointless bye.....My point was the term "colored" hasn't been used in 40 years and it's amazing that anyone would try to use it in any discussion legitimately.
Unless it was being used ironically, which he's proven wasn't the case, how can anyone think that's an appropriate term?
So he shouldn't count towards black lives matter then is that your opinion?Neither Hispanic or African American have anything to do with skin color. Soler would be considered Hispanic by that definition, so where does the "colored" or "person of color" legitimacy come in?
What the hell are you talking about? Hell black lives matter talks about the color of ****ing skin dude. This is completely pointless bye.....
"People like you" is ok but not to admit we have different colored skin. Lmfao, seriously.....BYE.Exactly, because people like you still use the term colored like there is a difference between black and white. There shouldn't be, that's the whole reason they make the argument of BLM. If there wasn't a difference, like there shouldn't be, there would be no reason to protest or make the argument in the first place.
I still don’t think you are grasping his usage of the word “colored.” Unless you are albino, everybody has a skin color. Recognizing this isn’t racist; harboring negative feelings towards people with a specific skin tone/color is. Within the context of this thread and Mountain Man Hawk’s comments, the way it was used makes sense. If he had used the word “pigmented” instead, the comment would have meant the exact same thingMy point was the term "colored" hasn't been used in 40 years and it's amazing that anyone would try to use it in any discussion legitimately.
Unless it was being used ironically, which he's proven wasn't the case, how can anyone think that's an appropriate term?