ADVERTISEMENT

*****MAGA in disarray, who will be speaker of the House***** McCarthy REMOVED! Jim Jordan 0-3. Election denier Mike Johnson confirmed. Vote them out

Sounds like the latest GOP house meeting did not go well ...

There was also an emotional and heated discussion over the death threats that some GOP lawmakers who oppose Jordan for speaker have faced.

Exiting the meeting, Wisconsin Rep. Mike Gallagher said he was “going to the chapel to pray the rosary.”

“Temperatures are really high in there,” a deflated-looking Gallagher said.
But Jordan still wants to drive the clown car, even though no one wants him to.
 
Every house has passed legislation that has no chance in the opposite chamber. That’s the way it works. What’s different now is that this house is absolutely content with their path being the only path. Refusing to compromise at all
There was never a mechanism where a single rep could call for the Speaker’s ouster just because. This House can’t pass anything without triggering that. There is no path for bipartisan cooperation that won’t trigger the nut jobs.
 



F80tpRfWMAA9r4D
 
Whatever the timeline, lots of stuff has to be done and correctly. A leader Pro Tem is not insurance against the radicals. The Republicans weren't functioning before the collapse and why is there confidence things will improve? Unless their caucus (hic cup) moderates and is willing to compromise, we'll back be we started 2 weeks ago.

Cole's nomination speech of Jordan was a terrible omen, reiterating the intransience of Republican's unexpectable positions, and glorifying a participant in a coup to overthrow the government, and what has to be considered among the most ineffective legators to have served in Congress. This has to be just another of the worst chapters in Amercian history. File with the "Weaponization Committees", Orange Turd crimes and impeachments, and criminal procedures to follow.
 
I'm not an attorney. Powell entered a guilty plea by agreement so she provided testimony of sufficient value to warrant the reduced sentence.

Doesn't this mean she has provided the evidence by testimony, tape, oral, or written? If so, the evidence is in possession of the prosecution, and she can't recant without perjuring, which would be a felony.

Edit: moved to Powell thread.
 
Last edited:
I'm not an attorney. Powell entered a guilty plea by agreement so she provided testimony of sufficient value to warrant the reduced sentence.

Doesn't this mean she has provided the evidence by testimony, tape, oral, or written? If so, the evidence is in possession of the prosecution, and she can't recant without perjuring, which would be a felony.
Please, I beg you, don’t use Powell and oral together.,
 
  • Like
Reactions: Thunderlips71
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT