The projection is strong in this one.Exactly. maga likes to shout, "lock them up," but when pressed to articulate the crime committed, they wilt.
The projection is strong in this one.Exactly. maga likes to shout, "lock them up," but when pressed to articulate the crime committed, they wilt.
Start with low hanging fruit, get all the ones that are incarcerated out.
Why would they need the military if all they're doing is pulling folks out of prison?But that is essentially how it will begin to unfold..
Why would they need the military if all they're doing is pulling folks out of prison?
What does that look like, then? The military supports the federal government in pulling people out of prison? How?If the military gets involved at all it would be in a supporting role...
Anyone here legally will have the option of staying. If they want to remain with that family member they’d need to relocate to wherever that person is being sent.What if only the father or the mother is deported? Or one of the grandparents?
What if the children are dreamers and they want them to stay?
I'm only saying that it will be ugly. How could something of this scale go smoothly?
My original comment was that this was going to "be ugly". That's it.Anyone here legally will have the option of staying. If they want to remain with that family member they’d need to relocate to wherever that person is being sent.
It’s their call, nobody will force them to go. But the illegal doesn’t get to stay because they have family here legally, that’s just dumb.
Requires 2/3 majority and every state has to ratify.
You are right, in general , it likely will get ugly.My original comment was that this was going to "be ugly". That's it.
i think they stopped pretending to give a shit what's actually in the constitution (unless guns are involved)Requires 2/3 majority and every state has to ratify.
Good luck with that.
I mean I know we are on opposite sides of most things but I don't quite get the hostility, I was just trying to answer your question.Sounds to me like you don't know WTF you're talking about.
Homan is a politician. What else is he going to say?
You're wrong.Requires 2/3 majority and every state has to ratify.
Good luck with that.
Fair enough, and my apologies if I came off in an offensive way.I mean I know we are on opposite sides of most things but I don't quite get the hostility, I was just trying to answer your question.
Undaunted, I will forge ahead!
It's not like Homan is making the statute up. How applicable or enforceable it is I don't know, but he obviously thinks it is. Without further ado, the code he cites is:
Section 1324(1)(a)(iii) of the immigration laws (Title 8, U.S. Code) if a person, knowing or in reckless disregard of the fact that an alien has come to, entered, or remains in the United States in violation of law, conceals, harbors, or shields from detection, or attempts to conceal, harbor, or shield from detection, such alien in any place, including any building or any means of transportation[.]
agreedLOL - Apprehending criminals is not Nazi imagery.
"All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside"You're wrong.
Sigh. It's hard to argue with magats like scuzzy who have no comprehension for the Constitution. The 14 amendment is pretty clear to reasonable folks."All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside"
They are vermin.agreed
but what you wrote "vermin rats gone so we will all be clapping when the last boxcar is loaded" is
Nazi
If he isn’t a politician Rifler, why is he playing “politics” here?He's not a politician,.. Yes, you are naive.
That's why sanctuary cities and states exist without impunity.