Lamar Alexander appears to be in. He was listed as a top four choice for one who may say no. They need to nominate and confirm by the end of this week.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You just can’t contain that excitement over Ginsburg’s death, can you?Lamar Alexander appears to be in. He was listed as a top four choice for one who may say no. They need to nominate and confirm by the end of this week.
You just can’t contain that excitement over Ginsburg’s death, can you?
You’ve been hoping and praying she’d keel over during Trump’s reign, and Santa delivered your Christmas gift early. It’s unicorns and glitter for you right now.
You’re a sick bastard.
47 minutes.Once again mstp no. Isn't it your bed time?
It always has. Most every advance in history features unrest.Just keep looting, rioting and invading citizens personal space, that’ll change things for ya.
Then why do you continue to post items that demonstrate your glee in replacing Ginsburg? We all know, you’re completely giddy about her death. You, Trump, and most of his supporters have been hoping she’d die while he was still in office.Once again mstp no. Isn't it your bed time?
Sure. No hearings. Just break out the rubber stamps for everyone. lolLamar Alexander appears to be in. He was listed as a top four choice for one who may say no. They need to nominate and confirm by the end of this week.
Just keep looting, rioting and invading citizens personal space, that’ll change things for ya.
What are this weeks Power Ball numbers since you're predicting the future?MAGAts have no shame, decency, respect, or civility. This is going to backfire spectacularly and the consequence will be an expanded Supreme Court. This will incentivize more, normally apathetic, people to show up and vote for Biden and other Democrats.
Dems should put this up on thousands of billboards in every last battleground state. They now have $125 million to spare.
1-800-EAT-SHITWhat are this weeks Power Ball numbers since you're predicting the future?
You're disoriented like Biden. I asked for the Power Ball numbers not your phone number.1-800-EAT-SHIT
That you take this seriously is hilarious.You're disoriented like Biden. I asked for the Power Ball numbers not your phone number.
The Constitution places the power to determine the number of Justices in the hands of Congress. “Court packing” is allowed constitutionally, also.If the dems pack the court we really are headed to a country and 2 sides that cannot remain together. . While people may not like Trumps tactics on this all, it is clearly allowed constitutionally. Court packing would be a nuclear bomb for our constitution.
My understanding was it was ruled unconstitutional when FDR tried it but I have yet to read up on it more than what I read in a news article.The Constitution places the power to determine the number of Justices in the hands of Congress. “Court packing” is allowed constitutionally, also.
No he threatened it. The SCOTUS magically started becoming more liberal almost immediately.My understanding was it was ruled unconstitutional when FDR tried it but I have yet to read up on it more than what I read in a news article.
So appoint who we want or we will destroy the country authoritarian style.Make your movie, Mitchy boy. Is this one "win" worth it to you and the GOP? In 4 months the Dems will have full control. Consider:
1) SCOTUS having number of Justices increased to 15 or more and packed by Biden with a bunch of young liberals.
2) D.C. and Puerto Rico as States #51 and #52.
3) After #2 goes through, Dems will have control of the Senate essentially forever. Then, next time the Cons manage to steal another Presidential election, it'll be guaranteed that a Con President will NEVER AGAIN have a SCOTUS justice nomination get confirmed. When Mitchy boy sets the precedent that the Senate can do whatever the heck they want for whatever reason they want, then the heavy liberal SCOTUS will have no problem allowing the Dem-controlled Senate to block SCOTUS nominations for 4-8 years or more. Why not?
Or, Mitchy can let this go in exchange for a compromise, which might present some of the above scenarios. Personally, I would prefer a "gloves off, no-holds-barred" approach by the Dems starting in January once they're in full control; it would be glorious. So make your move, Turtle-face. I dare you.
Just giving fair warning. Dems are not known for playing dirty like Cons are, but you'd certainly be asking for it. Your party is a dying breed. Gotta go sometime. This could be it. They'll build a GOP Museum right next to the Texas Cotton Gin Museum. They'll have statues of Orange Turd and Turtle-Face flanking the entrance.So appoint who we want or we will destroy the country authoritarian style.
This is similar to dems saying antifa/blm will burn the country down unless you elect who we say you have to elect
Court packing is as allowed as anything the Rs have done. Don’t cry when you burn. You asked for it.If the dems pack the court we really are headed to a country with 2 sides that cannot remain together. While people may not like Trumps tactics on this all, it is clearly allowed constitutionally. Court packing would be a nuclear bomb for our constitution.
If you wouldn’t find it offensive, I’d blow you.Make your movie, Mitchy boy. Is this one "win" worth it to you and the GOP? In 4 months the Dems will have full control. Consider:
1) SCOTUS having number of Justices increased to 15 or more and packed by Biden with a bunch of young liberals.
2) D.C. and Puerto Rico as States #51 and #52.
3) After #2 goes through, Dems will have control of the Senate essentially forever. Then, next time the Cons manage to steal another Presidential election, it'll be guaranteed that a Con President will NEVER AGAIN have a SCOTUS justice nomination get confirmed. When Mitchy boy sets the precedent that the Senate can do whatever the heck they want for whatever reason they want, then the heavy liberal SCOTUS will have no problem allowing the Dem-controlled Senate to block SCOTUS nominations for 4-8 years or more. Why not?
Or, Mitchy can let this go in exchange for a compromise, which might present some of the above scenarios. Personally, I would prefer a "gloves off, no-holds-barred" approach by the Dems starting in January once they're in full control; it would be glorious. So make your move, Turtle-face. I dare you.
Don’t claim you weren’t warned. When the government of the people, for the people is no longer by the people, it is the right and proper duty of the people to throw away that government and remake itself anew; a vessel for the common man.So appoint who we want or we will destroy the country authoritarian style.
This is similar to dems saying antifa/blm will burn the country down unless you elect who we say you have to elect
Just giving fair warning. Dems are not known for playing dirty like Cons are, but you'd certainly be asking for it. Your party is a dying breed. Gotta go sometime. This could be it. They'll build a GOP Museum right next to the Texas Cotton Gin Museum. They'll have statues of Orange Turd and Turtle-Face flanking the entrance.
Either that, or bring some honor and dignity back to your party. Your choice.
All the sh&t Trump and the GOP have pulled over the past 4 years, starting with the Garland fiasco, and you call potential Dem Court Packing as the tipping point? Good God.If the dems pack the court we really are headed to a country with 2 sides that cannot remain together. While people may not like Trumps tactics on this all, it is clearly allowed constitutionally. Court packing would be a nuclear bomb for our constitution.
No he threatened it. The SCOTUS magically started becoming more liberal almost immediately.
In any case, Biden is actually a person of principle unlike Trump. Even if R’s pull this stunt and Biden wins, I think he’ll avoid court packing. Eventually somebody has to be the bigger person. Won’t be a Republican.
And had it been done it 2016, I would have no problem with it.I'm in the wait until after the election camp, but if RBG, Clinton and Biden said this then not sure what the complaints are about.
And Biden's qoute:
“I made it absolutely clear that I would go forward with the confirmation process, as chairman — even a few months before a presidential election — if the nominee were chosen with the advice, and not merely the consent, of the Senate—just as the Constitution requires. There is no Biden rule. It doesn’t exist.”
- Joe Biden, 2016
I'm in the wait until after the election camp, but if RBG, Clinton and Biden said this then not sure what the complaints are about.
And Biden's qoute:
“I made it absolutely clear that I would go forward with the confirmation process, as chairman — even a few months before a presidential election — if the nominee were chosen with the advice, and not merely the consent, of the Senate—just as the Constitution requires. There is no Biden rule. It doesn’t exist.”
- Joe Biden, 2016
Harry Reid made the rule for 51 senators instead of 60 to confirm a judge, now Dems bitch about it.
Obama stated it was a national urgency to seat a judge prior to an election to avoid a 4-4 court. Now dems bitch about it.
Hypocrites.
Just keep looting, rioting and invading citizens personal space, that’ll change things for ya.