Last year it was pretty easy to name the starters. This year we could see 7-8 different starters, during the season, even if everyone stays healthy. This is Fran's first rebuilding year since he got us to the level of a consistent NCAA qualifier. Fingers crossed he has the right underclassmen and recruits to get us to an even higher level over the next 4 years.Whether Fran speaks about it or not, this should be the coaching staff's most challenging team in some time, because he doesn't know what he has. But what's more fun than opening presents when you don't know what's inside?
Isn't tomorrow Thursday?Tomorrow (Wednesday) is media day for BBall. It will be interesting to hear Fran and the players' thoughts on the upcoming season.
So, you're saying he would never play?Wagner could probably walk across the street and be our best receiver.
Whole bunch of articles out there so not gonna link em all. Trying not to get aboard the hype train but it's tough not to. I still think making the Dance is the ceiling for the team because we don't have a true PG and we're so young. Sounds like Cook is the real deal though. The struggle for this team will be finding another option when Jok is taken away. It sounds like Fran has had all the big boys working on their 3 pointers over the summer. It will almost certainly be position less basketball. I think a very underrated combo will be Cook and Wagner. Jok even said Wagner is unbelievably fast for a guy his size. People kinda forget about Wagner with Cook on board, but Wagner still has a big role.
Jok said to expect a lot of dunks this year. Tough to not get excited.
They learned well from white chocolate last year. #woody
He probably has the best potential of any player Iowa has had since Ricky Davis.
McCaffery had a simple, effective plan for how to sell Iowa to a player who had high-profile programs from around the country after him. He told Cook he was going to be a multidimensional player before Cook realized it himself.
'Nobody likes to be put in a box, obviously,' Cook said. 'Especially myself.
'I kind of do a little bit of everything on the court. Fran saw that in me. He's seen me work out, seen me play. He preached to me from Day 1 when he recruited me that you've got to be more than just a post player, got to be more than a 5-man.
'That he saw that before I even saw it was a big factor for me.' Cook said
Uh................That's a pretty high bar given that Davis was a 1st round draft pick and had a long nba career.
Sounds like Cook is the real deal. I am hoping the kid can come in and play solid minutes and put up 7-8pts a game.
I still think making the Dance is the ceiling for the team because we don't have a true PG and we're so young.
I think not having a "true PG" will hurt in crunch time, but outside of that I think they will be fine
Whole bunch of articles out there so not gonna link em all. Trying not to get aboard the hype train but it's tough not to. I still think making the Dance is the ceiling for the team because we don't have a true PG and we're so young. Sounds like Cook is the real deal though. The struggle for this team will be finding another option when Jok is taken away. It sounds like Fran has had all the big boys working on their 3 pointers over the summer. It will almost certainly be position less basketball. I think a very underrated combo will be Cook and Wagner. Jok even said Wagner is unbelievably fast for a guy his size. People kinda forget about Wagner with Cook on board, but Wagner still has a big role.
Jok said to expect a lot of dunks this year. Tough to not get excited.
I think Jordan is a point guard in a similar way that Gesell was a PG. I'm assuming Jordan will be a capable facilitator like Mike, but I'm also assuming that, like MG, he'll be fairly one dimensional in his scoring approach. While Mike was primarily driving and not much of a shooting threat, Jordan will be a shooting threat without much likelihood of driving into the lane and finishing at the hoop.If Jordan Bohannon is not a "true PG" then what designation would you give him?
Bohannon played the PG position almost exclusively as a 4 year varsity starter at Linn-Marr and also for the Martin Brothers team. I recall reading an article that mentioned him as a young boy and how his father sensed that Jordan would not grow as tall as his older brothers. His dad pushed Jordan to practice as a point guard in developmental basketball teams and that is where he played most in the years leading up to high school. As far as I can tell, he has played PG virtually all of his young basketball career so far.
I realize Bohannon isn't as athletic as Charlie Moore, Xavier Simpson, or some of the other PGs Fran offered ahead of him but that doesn't change the fact that PG is his position in college. Also, PGs can be proficient 3PT shooters and still run the offense.
SINCEThat's a pretty high bar given that Davis was a 1st round draft pick and had a long nba career.
Cook will probably avg closer to 12 or 13 pts. He is that good.Sounds like Cook is the real deal. I am hoping the kid can come in and play solid minutes and put up 7-8pts a game. Sounds like he is a match-up nightmare can step back and hit the 15footer and also attack the glass. That's a nice combo to have.
I think Fran and staff will have a challenge this year, but I think this team will be fun to watch. I expect them to lose some "bad games" but also pull off some upsets. Their young and inexperienced, which can be both good and bad. I think not having a "true PG" will hurt in crunch time, but outside of that I think they will be fine. It sounds like Iowa will not have a true PG or Center but 5 athletic guys who can step out and hit the 3 and also attack the rim.
I am pumped for this season. My expectations are not high, but the brand/style will be fun to watch.
He's a shooting guard. He doesn't have high D-1 handles and he doesn't have a high D-1 passing IQ. He's a capable guard but he'd rank among the bottom of BIG starting PG. IMO. And this is just my opinion.If Jordan Bohannon is not a "true PG" then what designation would you give him?
Bohannon played the PG position almost exclusively as a 4 year varsity starter at Linn-Marr and also for the Martin Brothers team. I recall reading an article that mentioned him as a young boy and how his father sensed that Jordan would not grow as tall as his older brothers. His dad pushed Jordan to practice as a point guard in developmental basketball teams and that is where he played most in the years leading up to high school. As far as I can tell, he has played PG virtually all of his young basketball career so far.
I realize Bohannon isn't as athletic as Charlie Moore, Xavier Simpson, or some of the other PGs Fran offered ahead of him but that doesn't change the fact that PG is his position in college. Also, PGs can be proficient 3PT shooters and still run the offense.
If Jordan Bohannon is not a "true PG" then what designation would you give him?
Bohannon played the PG position almost exclusively as a 4 year varsity starter at Linn-Marr and also for the Martin Brothers team. I recall reading an article that mentioned him as a young boy and how his father sensed that Jordan would not grow as tall as his older brothers. His dad pushed Jordan to practice as a point guard in developmental basketball teams and that is where he played most in the years leading up to high school. As far as I can tell, he has played PG virtually all of his young basketball career so far.
I realize Bohannon isn't as athletic as Charlie Moore, Xavier Simpson, or some of the other PGs Fran offered ahead of him but that doesn't change the fact that PG is his position in college. Also, PGs can be proficient 3PT shooters and still run the offense.
I think Jordan is a point guard in a similar way that Gesell was a PG. I'm assuming Jordan will be a capable facilitator like Mike, but I'm also assuming that, like MG, he'll be fairly one dimensional in his scoring approach. While Mike was primarily driving and not much of a shooting threat, Jordan will be a shooting threat without much likelihood of driving into the lane and finishing at the hoop.
What I, and many others, would like to see is a quick PG who defenders can't either sag off or play super tight because they are a threat to either shoot or blow by you. They are capable of pulling defenders away from their man to guard them, so they can kick it out for an open shot. I think Ulis and Moore both have that ability, but JoBo/Gesell likely don't.
I'm absolutely excited for Jordan and admittedly haven't seen him, so I can't say that he certainly doesn't have that drive-and-dish ability (If he does, then I believe we'll be a much better team than many anticipate), but from everything I've heard, he's not the most quick/athletic
I'm more worried about JB on D his frosh year. This is why I think he nod will be given to CW as the starter.I've seen Bohannon...it is remarkable how much bigger & stronger he has got...and quicker. I hope defenders sag off him. No Bohannon is not as quick as Ulis....but not very many are. I'll take Bohannon's outside shooting over Moore's quickness. It will be interesting to follow Mr Moore. Its one thing to blow by people but one still needs to finish.
Cook will probably avg closer to 12 or 13 pts. He is that good.
I'm more worried about JB on D his frosh year. This is why I think he nod will be given to CW as the starter.
I'm more worried about JB on D his frosh year. This is why I think he nod will be given to CW as the starter.
When we started 2 freshmen in 2012-13, we went 9-9. I know the B1G is supposed to be better than then, but this team arguably has more potential than the 2012 one. I understand the caution, but 7-11 should probably be expected as a bare minimum. 7-11 would be a big vs little dip from 12-6.I'm setting the bar at 7 conference wins and an NIT berth.
I still think think they will play some good games and be fun to watch at times.
This year is just most likely a little dip given the turnover of players from last year. A lot of young guys that are either new to the college game or have gotten few minutes thus far isn't likely to add up to an upper tier conference finish.