ADVERTISEMENT

Minneapolis PD Kill Black Man (not the subject of the warrant) during No Knock Search Warrant in Connection w/ a St Paul Homicide Investigation

Franisdaman

HB King
Nov 3, 2012
96,218
130,617
113
Heaven, Iowa
See link at end of post #2 for the video of the shooting.

The Black man, who was not the subject of the warrant, was beneath a blanket as the officers entered the apartment; a handgun emerged in his right hand before one of the officers fired 3 times.

Ben Crump is representing the family.

Video: Amir Locke, under blanket, holds gun as Minneapolis police officers enter, fire 3 shots

The 55-second video shows officers at the downtown Minneapolis apartment unit to serve a search warrant in connection with a St. Paul homicide investigation. Locke was not the subject of the warrant.

By Libor Jany, Paul Walsh and Abby Simons
Minneapolis Star Tribune

FEBRUARY 3, 2022 — 10:15PM


Minneapolis police body camera video released Thursday night showed several officers rushing into a downtown apartment shouting "Search warrant!" and then shooting and killing Amir Locke as he stirred beneath a blanket on a couch with a gun in his hand.

The 55-second video, first in slow motion and then real time, shows the SWAT officers enter and close in on the 22-year-old Locke with their guns drawn and equipped with mounted lights that illuminated the otherwise dark apartment. The incident Wednesday morning unfolded in seconds before Locke was shot and killed.

The officers were at the seventh-floor unit of the Bolero Flats Apartment Homes, at 1117 S. Marquette Av., shortly before 7 a.m. to serve a search warrant in connection with a St. Paul homicide investigation.

The Star Tribune learned earlier Thursday that Locke, a Black man, was not the subject of the warrant. Interim Minneapolis police chief Amelia Huffman confirmed late Thursday that Locke was not named in the warrant.

The video shows police turning the key quietly. As soon as the door was opened, multiple officers yelled, "Police search warrant! ... Get on the [expletive] ground!"

Locke is moving beneath the blanket, a handgun emerging in his right hand before one of the officers fires three times, knocking Locke to the floor. That's where the released video stops.

Amir Locke's parents, Andre and Karen Locke, declined to comment about the shooting, other than his mother saying, "We want justice for our son." Jeff Storms, an attorney representing the family, confirmed earlier Thursday that Locke's family viewed the video before its release.

Storms is partnering with civil rights attorney Ben Crump, who has won significant financial settlements for several families across the country who have lost loved ones to police violence in recent years, including a record $27 million settlement with the city of Minneapolis for the family of George Floyd.

The Locke family plans to hold a news conference Friday morning.

Authorities identified the officer who fired the fatal shots as Mark Hanneman. Huffman coordinated the video release with investigators at the Bureau of Criminal Apprehension (BCA) "without compromising the integrity of their investigation or their ability to collect evidence," read a statement from City Hall.

Crump and Storms said Locke has several family members in law enforcement and has no criminal history, and he was in legal possession of a firearm at the time of his death. Locke would not have been required to have a permit to possess the weapon in a private residence.

"Like the case of Breonna Taylor, the tragic killing of Amir Locke shows a pattern of no-knock warrants having deadly consequences for Black Americans," Crump said in a statement. "This is yet another example of why we need to put an end to these kinds of search warrants so that one day, Black Americans will be able to sleep safely in their beds at night."

Three sources from separate law enforcement agencies told the Star Tribune that Locke was not the target of the St. Paul homicide investigation. They spoke on the condition of anonymity because the case remains under BCA investigation.

Police officials said that a loaded handgun was recovered at the scene.

One of Amir Locke's cousins said Thursday there was nothing violent and hot-tempered about him.

"He was totally the opposite," said 21-year-old Ervin Locke Jr., who recalled the two of them catching up on the phone just last week. "All he did was crack jokes."
 
He said the man he's affectionately known all their lives by the nickname C-Mo "was no street person. All he was into was music and playing basketball. He stayed to himself."

Locke was not named in the application for the search warrant, but he is related to one of the people thought to be involved in the St. Paul homicide. A police spokesman declined to comment Thursday.

According to a dispatch report, police informed a dispatcher around 6:19 a.m. that they would be going into Apartment 701 at Bolero Flats. A comment added to the report showed that police would "AIR WHEN ABOUT TO EXECUTE THIS RISK – NO NOISE EXPECTED" — suggesting that they were carrying out a no-knock warrant. By 6:48 a.m., police called medics from Floor 7, indicating that someone was shot, the report showed. CPR was started three minutes later as officers brought the man, later identified as Locke, down to medics on the first floor. He was taken to a nearby hospital, where he was pronounced dead.

About 7:04 a.m., an officer said on the radio that police were "transporting" a woman to Room 801, an office at police headquarters that is used for interviews. It's unclear whether the woman in question was in the apartment with Locke.

Hanneman was the only officer who fired, striking Locke twice in the chest and once in the wrist, according to a separate report.

A search of court records showed that the warrant to support the raid hadn't been made public as of Thursday afternoon.

At a Thursday night news conference with Mayor Jacob Frey, Huffman said the department will reexamine its policies following the shooting. She defended a statement Wednesday that police announced their presence before crossing the threshold into the apartment, although the video indicates the officers were shouting as they entered. She also contended the barrel of the gun Locke was holding was pointed toward an officer outside the video frame.

Frey said the "video raises just about as many questions as it does answers. We intend to get answers as quickly as possible."

Questions from reporters mostly ended after civil rights activist and attorney Nekima Levy Armstrong approached Huffman and Frey, and said their handling of the shooting made her doubt her decision to work with the city on preventing further police violence.

"This is unacceptable, I'm sorry, it is," Levy Armstrong said. "When I agreed to work with you ... we talked about the importance of transparency and accountability, and what we are seeing is business as usual."

Referring to the decision to execute St. Paul's warrant, Levy Armstrong asked: "Why in the hell would you all sign up to do this in the first place?"

The MPD's initial press release about the encounter referred to Locke as "a suspect," although not necessarily in connection with the St. Paul homicide investigation. Huffman said that at the time the release was issued, "it certainly was unclear yesterday but it remains unclear if or how Mr. Locke is connected to St. Paul's investigation."

Earlier Thursday, pressure to release the video mounted on the city, as leaders from U.S. Rep. Ilhan Omar to City Council members Jason Chavez and Robin Wonsley Worlobah called for all footage to be made public. That demand was echoed in a letter to Huffman and Frey from members of the Minneapolis delegation of the Minnesota House.

In a statement released after the shooting, Police Officers Federation of Minneapolis president Sgt. Sherral Schmidt said the union was thankful that all of the officers involved were "safe." She said that the officer who shot the man was forced to make a "split-second decision to save his life and the lives of fellow officers."

Wednesday's shooting has revived a simmering debate over the use of so-called "no-knock" search warrants.

The use of these unannounced raids, which allow police to enter a property without announcing their presence beforehand, have been banned in cities across the country after they resulted in the deaths of innocent civilians. Minneapolis restricted the practice in 2020, but it is still occasionally used in certain cases.

While police have defended the use of no-knock raids as necessary for keeping officers safe while apprehending violent suspects, critics say it puts lives at risk.

Paul Applebaum, a private defense attorney, said no-knock warrants are often used in drug and violent crime cases, but that with the expansion of surveillance technology police should be able to apprehend a suspect without such a show of force.

"It seems like the risk is greater than the reward of preserving evidence or not having a shootout or all that," said Applebaum, who has sued officers for alleged misconduct. "It's like, just go sit in the lobby behind a newspaper and wait until he comes out."

Another problem, he says, is that judges tend to be deferential to law enforcement, signing off on no-knock warrants "without thinking about the potential repercussions if something goes wrong."

"And this is what happens," he said.

Under the current Minneapolis policy, officers must identify themselves as "police" and announce their purpose as "search warrant" before entering any domicile — regardless of whether a judge signed off on an "unannounced" or "no-knock" entry. Once inside a residence, officers are supposed to periodically repeat those announcements in case occupants didn't hear them. The same rules, which mirror those already in place across the river in St. Paul, also apply for arrest warrants.

The practice, most often used by SWAT officers, should help maintain the element of surprise and preservation of evidence while eliminating confusion about who's entering the building, a police spokesman said at the time.

Policy dictates that no-knock warrants would be acceptable only in high-risk circumstances such as a hostage situation, when "giving an announcement would create an imminent threat of physical harm to victims, officers or the public." Some exceptions apply, but investigators need to obtain permission from the chief of police or his or her designee.

In the past, MPD executed an average of 139 no-knock warrants a year.



LINK TO STORY:
 
This just makes me sick. Police will be exonerated because the victim showed a handgun. Meanwhile, it’s no longer possible to protect/defend yourself in your own home without risking death at the hands of police.

i predict no charges but a decent settlement for the victim’s family.
 
I have a security system that extends to the street, so hopefully I'll be saved from getting shot by a cop if any break down my door.

I have a good friend who is pretty close to being deaf. During the day, he wears two very high tech hearing aids. He wouldn't be able to hear LEO's screaming obscenity laden instructions.
 
So is the problem that the police shot a man raising a gun or the no knock warrant?

Here is the problem though. . . we live in a country where it is your legal right to shoot someone illegally coming into your home.

When you are awakened suddenly by people coming into your home there isn't a lot of time to get your mind on straight and figure out if these are cops or bad guys.

No knock warrants should honestly be an absolute last resort for investigating only the most serious crimes.
 
I'll assume that's not a serious question.
it's the most important. You can't have a serious conversation if you don't know the problem.
If no knock warrants are legal (if not please let me know), this may be an unintended consequence and the logical result would be to come up with a better system of catching bad guys. I think that would be a good place to start the conversation. I'm not sure a no knock warrant is necessary tactically speaking in an apartment that appears to be in an apartment building.

If your problem is with the cop shooting a guy that is raising a gun at them, while they are doing their duty, I don't know what to tell you. Where the hell would we be in this country if we just let people pull a gun on cops and that lets them get away. It would be like letting shoplifting go unpunished. It leads to larger problems by people that have no problem not obeying the law.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Old_wrestling_fan
Here we go again.... glass half full: it's below freezing and several inches of snow on the ground, any rioters will have to be especially determined.
 
  • Like
Reactions: red/green hawk
Was it his home? What do you expect the cops to do? Ask him if he's going to shoot at them to find out his intentions?
Fair question I made the assumption it was his home. If it's a no knock warrant he doesn't know that they are cops because they don't announce that, correct?
 
i predict no charges but a decent settlement for the victim’s family.
This.

The warrant is currently legal. It would be reasonable to believe the officer thought his life was in danger. The lethal use of force will be justified.

But they will settle with the family since he was not named and want the bad publicity to go away as quickly as possible.
 
  • Like
Reactions: goldmom
So far some initial research has revealed:

Locke wasn't who the cops were looking for.

He was only staying there.

He was a licensed CCW and gun owner.

St. Paul PD didn't request a no-knock warrant, but MPD got one anyway.
 
Fair question I made the assumption it was his home. If it's a no knock warrant he doesn't know that they are cops because they don't announce that, correct?

They yelled "Police, Search Warrant". The problem is if he was napping on the couch they likely woke him out of a dead sleep and he had very little time to figure out what's going on.

People being woken out of a dead sleep are not exactly known for stellar decision making seconds after being awoken.
 
The no knock warrant is the issue. The people who asked for it, and the judge who signed it are the problem. The man shot was a law abiding citizen at the time he was shot. He had a permit for the gun and had no idea cops broke into the home. The cops were just doing their job and put into a really bad situation of no fault of their own.
 
not a video game. This is a consequence of being the most armed population on the planet.

I'm aware of that. . . but police officers sign up for the risk to protect the public. In this country they simply can not start shooting every time they see a gun. Too many perfectly innocent people with no intention to harm anyone have one.

You have to take some risk in order to give members of the public the chance to live.
 

That's not exactly true. . . if you watch the video as soon as they opened the door they yelled "Police, Search Warrant"

Problem is again that comprehending that information when being awoken out of a dead sleep is easier said then done.

If I let you go into a deep sleep and then suddenly yell something out that awakens you, what are the chances that 9 seconds later you are going to be able to repeat to me what I yelled out AND fully comprehend what all of that means.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT