Speed may very well be guilty of murder and should be caught and tried but it appears they had info that he was seen at the complex so they just decided to raid any place there where he might be rather than try to determine where he actually was or if he was even still in the building at all. And it appears that he wasn't. Either that or they should have raided every single apartment there on the premise he could be in any of them.
The ONLY question that matters is whether any benefit obtained from a no-knock warrant outweighs the risks they produce to LEOs, civilians, and departments. Breonna Taylor and Amir Locke and others would say that the shoddy police work involved in obtaining and executing their particular warrants aren't worth the price paid. I agee.
"It appears," huh?
Once again, you are talking out of your ass & you show your ignorance by making ASSumptions.
And, again,
@Hawkman98 explained to you that search warrants often occur when the suspect is not there. They only have so much time to get them done.
And, again, if you would educate yourself and not be so ignorant about this case, you would already know that:
* Speed shot and killed the St Paul man in January with a
.223 caliber firearm.
* .223 rifle rounds can penetrate police body armor
* Speed and the other suspect(s) were posting videos and photos on Instagram, holding several different firearms, including what appeared to be the .223 caliber firearm used in the murder.
They were more than armed and dangerous.
You ask if the benefits of using the no knock outweigh the risks. Well, the benefits are clear and obvious. But, you are ignorant and biased and can't see those benefits. The benefits, for starters:
(1) Speed needed to be removed from the streets.
That would be a HUGE BENEFIT to all so that there are NO MORE ARMED ROBBERY, CAR JACKING AND MURDER VICTIMS.
(2) Speed was clearly extremely dangerous.
@Hawkman98 , do you want to risk knocking on the door & being shot by a .223 firearm?
And there you go again saying it was shoddy police work involved in obtaining and executing the warrants. Well, the judge doesn't sign off on the warrant if things are "shoddy." And
@Hawkman98 already explained that the police executed the warrants just as they are trained.
It's pretty clear that you don't get much of anything right. But at least you are consistent so we know to take everything you say moving forward with a grain of salt.