Look it up....probablt Obama. But I will let you tell me. I have a life to live.Please show us the last time a majority of the electorate voted for any president.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Look it up....probablt Obama. But I will let you tell me. I have a life to live.Please show us the last time a majority of the electorate voted for any president.
Natural, your arguing these threads just points out how much of a liberal stooge you are. Point of fact is, Iowa is flyover country for the liberal elites on the East and West Coasts. The electoral college was put in place to ensure that the people in rural areas had a say in government and were not made vassals of the state. This is exactly what Machiavelli was warning of in his book. You cannot trod over large geographically diverse portions of the population. The founding fathers were genius in devising the electoral college. Get a clue, you lost this one.Again, how is it unjust? He entire premise of your argument depends on "the will of the people". Yet 70% of the electorate did not vote for her. So what's happening right now is a group of 30% of the electorate is trying to claim its will is more important than the 70%. Your "will of the people" argument only works if Hillary got over 50% of the electorate to vote for her.
And thus, your argument fails - and you know it. But you weren't smart enough to realize it until it was pointed out.
Again - that's just a majority of the voters. Not a majority of the American electorate. Thats only a fraction of the electorate.More voted for "her" than voted for "him"...this protest, using your words and logic, support what the majority of voters felt this November. You are alfully free interchanging electoral college voting for popular votes.
In understand...and appreciate the difference Muteo....do you?
I like that I'm powerful in your mind.When did these riots become about the electoral college? When Natural determined it so because the truth was even more embarrassing than his only slightly less embarrassing argument?
Dude - Obama didn't get anywhere close to a majority of the electorate. At best he got 35% of the electorate.Look it up....probablt Obama. But I will let you tell me. I have a life to live.
More like a legend in your own.I like that I'm powerful in your mind.
Joke. They were my most hated rival in college.Typical liberal.
I just want you to tell all of us how "Russia is surrounded by NATO though" YOU LOSELook it up....probablt Obama. But I will let you tell me. I have a life to live.
I it was proven to be more bullshit from the right.Sure. Let's run with that. You guys are ****ing shameful.
It's the damn Tea Party behind all this violence. Just trying to make you guys look bad. You got it.
You are partially correct in that these are orchestrated and in many cases outside agitators. But they are paid for and funded by people like George Soros and the DNC. This has already been proven.
Wish people would just ignore him. He wants shit like this.
Yep....actually, the liberals outnumber the conservatives 5-1 and have the backing of the administration, so the conservatives keep their heads down and try not to make waves.I was a student at iowa during the Vietnam years.My roommate who was very smart but a flaming lib.He and I teamed up to reach a high grade point by sharing notes from class.I played football in college.He was a complete wimp physically.He became so obsessed with the anti war lib movement,he told me he was going to kill me when the revolution started.I hate bullies,so I didn't kick his ass.I wonder if we are starting see the same bs as was happening back then.
Hey dumbass, look at the Wikileaks dump. There was emails proving that they were paying people to protest and that the DNC was responsibleI it was proven to be more bullshit from the right.
http://www.snopes.com/anti-trump-protesters-bused-into-austin/
Link?Hey dumbass, look at the Wikileaks dump. There was emails proving that they were paying people to protest and that the DNC was responsible
You really think all of those protesters in North Dakota are there on their own dime?
There are numerous confirmations of the same people organizing these riots and many of the same people participating in each one from City to City.
Yeah, keep talking tough like that. One of these days the reasonable are going to stop being reasonable. He didn't spread hate and violence, he's been talking about this exact type of thing as a matter of fact.Spread hate and violence you are going to get the violence. Too bad he wasn't out there in the middle of all of it.
Do your own research. If you have been paying attention during the John podesta WikiLeaks deal you would have seen it.Link?
You posted it. You supply it.Do your own research. If you have been paying attention during the John podesta WikiLeaks deal you would have seen it.
That's not how this works sparkyYou posted it. You supply it.
He literally speaks and advocates for the KkK.Yeah, keep talking tough like that. One of these days the reasonable are going to stop being reasonable. He didn't spread hate and violence, he's been talking about this exact type of thing as a matter of fact.
Keep it coming lefties, keep it coming.
I can't find it. All I can find is reputable sites that say is bs.That's not how this works sparky
No, he speaks against the rise of feminazism, globalism, and far left wing lunacy. He's a gay jew, that is supposed to follow hook line and sinker with the far left BS. He doesn't and that is why he's targeted the way he is. He's a problem for the status quo types. They can't have certain types having opinions that don't meet the required criteria.He literally speaks and advocates for the KkK.
Show me the proof of this statement by the way.He literally speaks and advocates for the KkK.
Whatever it is Muteo...it is 3M more votes than what voted for the Trumpster. If Hillary got 30% of the vote, Trump got 30%-3M.Again - that's just a majority of the voters. Not a majority of the American electorate. Thats only a fraction of the electorate.
If Hillary got over 50% of the electorate to vote for her you have a strong "will of the people" argument. At 30% you do not.
Again....3M more votes than Trump.Dude - Obama didn't get anywhere close to a majority of the electorate. At best he got 35% of the electorate.
I'm not the one trying to argue the "will of the people" has been so badly trampled that it requires we change the constitution to end the electoral college.Again....3M more votes than Trump.
Haha. Love to see those pussy libs fight something that hits back.When you tell a state their voters don't count, this is what you get. Thanks founding fathers. Lets rid ourselves of this vestige of slavery and allow every American an equal vote for our one national leader. You can either stand up now on principle or be forced to stand up later on bodies, but its going to happen. Justice always wins out.
You might need to leave your job. I understand that's a big problem for your team.Haha. Love to see those pussy libs fight something that hits back.
You know it defeats your ignorant argument. Your entire point is that a will of the people isn't being followed - yet close to 70% of the electorate did not vote for Hillary Clinton. How is it the will of the people she must be president? It isn't. However, where does Trump have the right to say "The people have spoken" and chose him? They didn't. By your own logic...the "states" elected Trump and it was not the people. What did the founder of your Republican Party say about this nation at Gettysberg? Something about a government "of the people, by the people, for the people shall not perish from the earth"....Now you are correcting Mr. Lincoln?
People who understand our constitution realize our presidential election is about the will of the states. And the states elected Trump.