NPR suspends veteran editor who blew whistle on liberal bias at organization
- Thread starter NorthernHawkeye
- Start date
He didn't appeal it because he didn't want to work for the shower of shit CeO, who has done nothing but shit out of her mouth for the last 36 hours.
No matter how many times you repeat that false info doesn't make it true, nor alter the fact that NPR is a very centrist reporting entity.
#DATA
My 30 minute turn to Newsmax was literally an anti-Biden/OrangeTurd campaign experience. And this is no exaggeration.
Forget the previous friction. Does this sound or seem like center to you for a "news network"?
I didn't pirate the thread - just responded. Ignore if it bothers you. We have to every day.
Would you extend freedom of the press to include not having the government fund 'non-profits' who generate lists and campaigns with social media companies to de-amplify particular voices?
Is that violating the first amendment, or can the government outsource the activity?
NPR should receive 0 federal funding.
NPR suspends veteran editor who blew whistle on liberal bias at organization
NPR has suspended veteran editor Uri Berliner after he detailed his employer’s "absence of viewpoint diversity" last week in a stunning rebuke of the news organization.www.foxnews.com
Meanwhile, actual facts come out that are summarily ignored by the minions who's brains have been turned to mush by right-wing propaganda...
Uri Outright LIED about all the party affiliations:
Uri acknowledges this lie:
Actual review of this lie shows it is complete bullshit:
"9" actual uses of LatinX vs ~400 uses of Latina/Latino
No actual research to support this wild claim on Israel coverage:
Completely out-of-context BS here, where NPR coverage mirrored that of most news outlets:
steveinskeep.substack.com
Uri Outright LIED about all the party affiliations:
Uri acknowledges this lie:
Actual review of this lie shows it is complete bullshit:
"9" actual uses of LatinX vs ~400 uses of Latina/Latino
No actual research to support this wild claim on Israel coverage:
Completely out-of-context BS here, where NPR coverage mirrored that of most news outlets:
How my NPR colleague failed at “viewpoint diversity”
Uri Berliner gave a perfect example of the kind of journalism he says he’s against.
steveinskeep.substack.com
87 to zeroMeanwhile, actual facts come out that are summarily ignored by the minions who's brains have been turned to mush by right-wing propaganda...
Uri Outright LIED about all the party affiliations:
Uri acknowledges this lie:
Actual review of this lie shows it is complete bullshit:
"9" actual uses of LatinX vs ~400 uses of Latina/Latino
No actual research to support this wild claim on Israel coverage:
Completely out-of-context BS here, where NPR coverage mirrored that of most news outlets:
How my NPR colleague failed at “viewpoint diversity”
Uri Berliner gave a perfect example of the kind of journalism he says he’s against.
Yes: that's fully debunked by the info in my post. Uri just made it up.
He didn't make it up, it's 100% factual. You're coping and claiming some people may not be tied to either political party but give no concrete evidence of any numbers to support your statement/claim. If you wanna say 87-0-x then go for it. NPR is still headed by a nut job leftist that pushes propaganda endlessly just like she did at Wikipedia (and the founder of wiki also called her out on destroying that platforms credibility). Inskeep is one of the 87 btw and shouldn't be trusted to be impartial. They don't deserve that assumption.
Nah, Steve and Aaron the far leftists made the response up. Checkmate.
Joe - are you an NPR listener? I’m someone who listens occasionally and it does feel like coverage has taken a harder turn to the left. The two big changes I’ve noticed were post-Trump coming on the scene and post-George Floyd.
I used to listen to Fresh Air all the time. I hate Trump but it felt like they would bring up Trump randomly every episode. It got very tiring.
After George Floyd and the recent “identity” politics stuff, similar spin on so many stories. I remember listening after an electric substation I believe had an attack or incident. Person on NPR said, “Some have said it was caused by anti-trans activists, although their is no evidence…” If there is no evidence, how is it good journalism to state that. Also, do I think they would state if there were rumors it was caused by trans activists with no evidence? Stuff like that isn’t a big deal by itself but it just infects all of its coverage. The audience is savvy enough to understand how coverage leans. I’ve listened way less.
I’ll give the inverse example as well. I used to listen to Joe Rogan a decent amount. I’m sure if you asked him, he would say he leans down the middle. However, if he complains about Nancy Pelosi constantly, its not hard to see where he truly leans. I barely listen to him anymore either as that gets old fast.
That is one hell of a lot of propaganda you just posted. No surprise it is posted by our resident useful idiot and propagandist.Meanwhile, actual facts come out that are summarily ignored by the minions who's brains have been turned to mush by right-wing propaganda...
Uri Outright LIED about all the party affiliations:
Uri acknowledges this lie:
Actual review of this lie shows it is complete bullshit:
"9" actual uses of LatinX vs ~400 uses of Latina/Latino
No actual research to support this wild claim on Israel coverage:
Completely out-of-context BS here, where NPR coverage mirrored that of most news outlets:
How my NPR colleague failed at “viewpoint diversity”
Uri Berliner gave a perfect example of the kind of journalism he says he’s against.
You still wearing a mask?
Just finished up a 1 1/2 hour run. Listened to Fresh Air on the IPR app. Lost count how many times the participants mentioned whites, white males, elites, founding fathers, Republicans, Trump, gerrymandering, etc...
Zero counter points to anything that was discussed.
Zero counter points to anything that was discussed.
Keep listening, you might broaden your understanding of the world
Considering the latest Fresh Air episode (4/20) was Salman Rushdie's interview and about the show Diarra from Detroit....that would be quite a topic divergence.
It does do that,.. I listen to NPR daily and my understanding of the world is that things are becoming more and more woke, by the day...
So even though evidence shows that there is no bias you want NPR to hire less qualified journalists just to so they have a conservative voice in the room?
Well since there's allegedly 0 Republicans that work for NPR it's safe to assume that there haven't been any conservative journalists that have met their qualifications. So if you want NPR to have a conservative voice they would need to lower their standards.
