Is it only acceptable to make fun of people who didn’t serve?
National Guard Disputes Tim Walz's Military Biography
- Thread starter Sullivan
- Start date
I'm not hating on veterans. I'm hating on a guy that lied.
You must really hate Trump then!
- Sep 13, 2002
- 98,926
- 207,281
- 113
Yep. Very predictable too. The numpties see the headline, run with it and then defend it when it is shown to be bullshit. There is no depth of thought, just simple minded followers.
when you believe something is true, it is true.
Just like I’m the coolest person on this board. 🤪
- Sep 13, 2002
- 98,926
- 207,281
- 113
He soooooo wants there to be something bad there and it's not and it's twisting him all up.
Sad.
It looks like she's reading from the teleprompter again.
You should support a smarter candidate.
Again, it isn't about deployments or disputing he ever obtained that rank ect.
The issue that he faces is he has presented himself as "retired Command Sargent major" and he is not that. Specific to the stolen valor act of 2013. He has used it for personal or financial gain.
And he knew he no longer held that rank.
And he was using that title as recently as yesterday in publications.
Yeah your Pepsi thread was top notch, too bad it was already debunked here before you even began. Great content that I’m certain will be the difference come November.
He was CSM and he is retired. You're wrong.
Hey shiteaters. He did more than you. Eat shit.
Read the OP. He does not hold the rank "retired command Sargent major".
This is a real problem for him.( legal)
( and that not even bringing up the dumb "I carried this in combat" type dumb shit he's going to have to get past. ) (social)
On paper this appears to be a text book case of using a military title for finacial advancement, a title he did not hold, you good with that?
Cuz I can guarantee if I would have asked Jimmy that question 7 days ago I know the response.
Financial advancement? You gotta be shiting me. And if you are, devour the shit.
He didn't say he held the rank. He said he was a CSM and is retired.
Someone who was a CFO and then went on to be a Controller before they retired certainly has the right to claim they are a retired CFO.
You're really bad at this stuff. I can't imagine what it must be like for you to continue to have to deal with the embarrassment you bring onto yourself. But by all means, continue cuz it's funny as hell.
The Stolen Valor Act of 2013 makes it a crime to lie about receiving a valor award (like a Medal of Honor or Purple Heart). What could that possibly have to do with this?
What financial advancement did he receive? This will be good.
There are more parts to it as well, I've posted the link. It's specific to the portion of using a "title or rank"
He's a candidate to be the vice president of the united states you epic fuc.king numpty.
He was a high school teacher with a high school teacher's pay before entering politics. With his time in the House and Governor's office, plus MN employee retirement program and guard retirement, he is set for life.
You are grasping....and frankly making an ass of yourself. Just stop. You are better than this
So you're claiming not only that he didn't achieve CSM rank and retire with that rank (even though he did) but that he used that rank to become a VP candidate.
Wow. You are a dumb mother****er.
He's not better than this. He will continue to spin and make things up to avoid admitting he is completely full of shit.
Again. From the article:
Minnesota National Guard, told Just the News on Wednesday that the governor did not retire as "Command Sergeant Major Walz" in 2005, as stated on Minnesota's official website, but as master sergeant "because he did not complete additional coursework at the U.S. Army Sergeants Major Academy." A soldier who does not complete the requisite coursework is automatically demoted, according to Army regulations.
He was in the military. He didn't complete the coursework. He was demoted. He retired. He retired with the lower rank. It seems pretty straightforward.
If he wanted to be a Command Sargeant Major Walz, he would have completed additional coursework at the U.S. Army Sergeants Major Adademy.
Except he did retire when he was in the CSM position.
Are you trying to say he was never promoted to CSM? If so, you're wrong on that as well.
No. I'm saying that he was a CSM. But, he was demoted before he retired, because he didn't complete the coursework.
I'm saying that if we wanted to retire as a CSM, he should have completed the coursework.
When I told you I thought this thread might be above your difficultly I was being genuine.
I think he was technically demoted after retirement but the paperwork corrects what his "retired" rank should be.
Similar threads
