yes that is 100% correct as long as the brick came in on time to challengeSo you are saying if a pin occurs after prematurely awarding the two backs, the pin would not count? I’d like to see the wording of that rule.
yes that is 100% correct as long as the brick came in on time to challengeSo you are saying if a pin occurs after prematurely awarding the two backs, the pin would not count? I’d like to see the wording of that rule.
nope unfortunately. everything after the mistake is dead time. so he awards the 2 incorrectly at :29. woods turns him again at :25. after the review, they restart at :29 because that's when the change is made. everything after is wiped off.That makes no sense in this case. He counted 2. He then counted 4 on the same hold and was going to incorrectly make it 6 backs vs the 4 it should have been. A correct review should be to recognize the hold didn't change and then give 4 total backs based on that fact. He awarded 2 extra backs after the 4 count and so review and get rid of the 2 extra backs.
No need to mention that matchup. Spencer will like pin him in the first minute.Not TWOOO sure why you left off #1 Lee vs #3 Cronin? Maybe you just feel SL is just gonna kill him?
In any case lets have some fun with it!
What does SL do against #3?
Pin in first, pin in 2nd, pin in 3rd?
Tech in 1st, 2nd, 3rd?
Win by major, win by decision?
I am taken PIN in 1st!!!
Read my own reply..I was sitting at the meet watching him pummel this kid but doing no scoring. Literally as I sent, he turned it on.So a major isn't good enough? He's like 9-1...what more did you expect?
Glory wrestled 133 again today against Rider.Random Twitter poster but…