NET Ranking: On March 17, Iowa is #43. How NET is Determined & What's a QUAD 1, 2, 3 & 4 Win/Loss

[Hawksfor3]

what channels do you get?

do you get all the local CBS, NBC, ABC, FOX channels?

how much is it per month?

Thanks!

I took the $40/mo package. Yes, I get those and the local ones. Using antenna right now and may go to wi-fi later. If you search Youtube TV on Bing or whatever search engine you use, you can type in your zip code and it will list available channels in your area. I'm gonna check out the movies they have. I guess they have a cloud that you can DVR movies and shows and the cloud keeps them for 9 mos. Still new to it so I can't give much info right now.

 

[Franisdaman]

I took the $40/mo package. Yes, I get those but not the local ones. Using antenna right now and may go to wi-fi later. If you search Youtube TV on Bing or whatever search engine you use, you can type in your zip code and it will list available channels in your area. I'm gonna check out the movies they have. I guess they have a cloud that you can DVR movies and shows and the cloud keeps them for 9 mos. Still new to it so I can't give much info right now.

who is your internet provider?

the only thing you then need is a wi-fi router in order to stream to all your smart TVs, correct?

 

[Hawksfor3]

I have Charter (formerly Time Warner) and I'm streaming everything right now to my PC via cable modem. (60 MBPS). I can project it to my old flat screen lol.

 

[Franisdaman]

I have Charter (formerly Time Warner) and I'm streaming everything right now to my PC via cable modem. (60 MBPS). I can project it to my old flat screen lol.

so you don't have wi-fi? you connect your laptop to your TV via a cable?

just curious because my parents are sick of paying $170/month for a landline, cable TV & internet. But they are not the best with technology either....

 

[Hawksfor3]

so you don't have wi-fi? you connect your laptop to your TV via a cable?

just curious because my parents are sick of paying $170/month for a landline, cable TV & internet. But they are not the best with technology either....

No wi-fi. Just my internet and modem. Streaming directly to my PC and I ran an HDMI cable from PC to TV. That way, I can project anything running on my computer to the TV. Tell your parents I feel their pain.

 

[Franisdaman]

No wi-fi. Just my internet and modem. Streaming directly to my PC and I ran an HDMI cable from PC to TV. That way, I can project anything running on my computer to the TV. Tell your parents I feel their pain.

thanks for confirming your setup; they have a desktop in a back room, far from where their TV is

 

[Hawksfor3]

thanks for confirming your setup; they have a desktop in a back room, far from where their TV is

Yeah, I have an old school TV (not a smart TV and no apps in it). Just a (believe it or not) Westinghouse flat screen TV. Kind of like the comedian Mike McDonald who said that when he was a kid his mom and dad bought him a Kenmore electric guitar. He said, "Because that's where all the rock stars shop for their guitars." "Spin, rinse, dry." He said, "Mom where's the amplifier?" She said, "Don't you just plug it into the wall?" He said, I'd like to plug you into the wall!" Good stuff.

 

[Hawksfor3]

I believe Youtube TV also has at least two overflows for BTN, maybe 3.

 

[TheTruthTheWholeTruth]

Iowa up to 23 today. The stinker of the night goes to Arizona St. They dropped from 61 to 78. Don’t lose at home, in a blowout, to a team that was previously ranked 230 NET. It finest work out very well. Oh, and Penn St bounces back to a Q1 win for anyone that beat them on the road.

 

[HeRKeYHoPeFuL]

I've added some info to my tracking to look for potential "quad movers", and if we're looking to have the best possible resume, we're looking for:
Nebraska to climb 6 spots (vs Nebraska Q2 to Q1)
Ohio State to climb 7 spots (vs Ohio State Q2 to Q1)
Pitt to climb 12 spots (vs Pitt Q3 to Q2)
Illinois to climb 13 spots (vs Illinois Q3 to Q2)
UNI to climb 2 spots (Neutral UNI Q4 to Q3)

I'm hopeful we'll see a few of these, and we've got to hope Northwestern (73) and Penn State (74) stay in the top 75 so the road wins stay Q1.

 

[HawkLand]

PSU at 8-15 (1-11) counting as a quad 1 win. With some reservation, I will take it I guess.

 

[Franisdaman]

Just a reminder about tomorrow's reveal.

It will be interesting to see who the Top 16 teams are on Saturday.

Will they line up with the NET's Top 16?

We shall see.

Note that the Selection Committee Chair was in the stands in Bloomington watching Iowa play at IU. Hopefully he was impressed.

Check it out:

 

[Franisdaman]

Here's how Iowa can earn its way to Des Moines:

https://www.hawkcentral.com/story/s...ournament-in-des-moines-heres-how/2807834002/

 

[Franisdaman]

JOE BOOZELL | NCAA.COM | FEBRUARY 9, 2019


NCAA bracketology: Let's break down the Top 16 for the men's tournament

Here is a full look at the top 16 teams if the season ended today, according to the Division I Men's Basketball Committee.

CURRENT SEED
1 Duke
1 Tennessee
1 Virginia
1 Gonzaga
------------------------------
2 Kentucky
2 Michigan
2 North Carolina
2 Michigan State
------------------------------
3 Purdue
3 Kansas
3 Houston
3 Marquette
------------------------------
4 Iowa State
4 Nevada
4 Louisville
4 Wisconsin


The 1-seeds were predictable, and it's hard to argue with any of them. Duke, Tennessee, Virginia and Gonzaga have a combined six losses between them and are the top four teams, in some order, in the NET rankings and the AP Poll.

ANDY KATZ PREDICTION: The complete March Madness field of 68 predicted after the Top 16 reveal

They've been the four most consistently dominant schools this year. And two of those losses came against other current 1-seeds; Virginia lost to Duke, while Duke fell to Gonzaga.

Duke, Tennessee, Virginia and Gonzaga all have outstanding resumes, and they look the part. All are legitimate national title contenders.

Move down to the 2-line, and you have more great teams, but they haven't been as consistently good as the 1s. Kentucky, for instance, has been playing like a 1 seed since about mid-December. But it struggled early on in a way that the top four teams haven't. The Wildcats are 12-1 since Dec. 15 with wins over North Carolina, Louisville, Auburn, Mississippi State, Kansas and Florida. That's incredible work, and nobody wants to play Kentucky right now. It could inch its way up to the 1-line by season's end. But for now, this is right.

The same goes for teams like Michigan and Michigan State. The Wolverines started off 17-0 but haven't looked as good in the last six games, falling to Wisconsin and Iowa. The Spartans, meanwhile, ripped off a 13-game win steak but are currently on a three-game skid. That includes a loss to Illinois, and Michigan State recently learned that Joshua Langford won't return this season.

Michigan State has done enough to justify a 2-seed at the moment, but the arrow is pointing down. Keep an eye on the Spartans the rest of the way. And North Carolina is sort of the anti-Michigan State: the Tar Heels were up and down until about a month ago, and they've won six straight games since. UNC has the talent to beat anyone.

Things get more interesting after the top two seed lines, and Kansas is an interesting inclusion as a three. The Jayhawks are ranked 18th in the NET and have really struggled lately. But their overall resume is still solid: Kansas banked wins over Michigan State, Marquette, Villanova and Tennessee early. Like Michigan State, we'll see if the Jayhawks can maintain this seeding. Because they've lost four of six and haven't looked right since Udoka Azubuike went down. Here's the committee's explanation on Kansas, which was close to nabbing a No. 2 seed:

“The final spot on the 2 line came down to Michigan State’s eight Quadrant 1 wins, five of which have come away from home,” said Muir. “While Kansas has a similar number of Quadrant 1 wins as the Spartans, we thought Kansas’s performance on the road, along with the unfortunate season-ending injury to Udoka Azubuike, kept the Jayhawks behind Purdue. At the same time, the abundance of quality wins kept Kansas in front of Houston."

NCAA.com college hoops home | NET rankings

It's also a bit surprising that Marquette is a 3-seed, but Villanova isn't in at all. The Wildcats rank higher than the Golden Eagles in the NET, and their records are identical. But Marquette notched nonconference wins over Wisconsin, Buffalo and Louisville, while Villanova really struggled before Big East play began.

Marquette and Villanova face each other on Saturday. Again, it's interesting to see how the committee views the top two squads in the Big East now, but there is a lot of basketball to be played before Selection Sunday. From the committee on Villanova:

"While a handful of teams were considered for the final spot, it eventually turned into a two-team race between Wisconsin and Villanova, and the Badgers ended up getting more votes based on having six Quadrant 1 wins, including four away from home.”

A note on the final seed line: Nevada as a four may seem low at first glance, and its 21-1 record is pristine. But it doesn't have the quality wins that the schools on the top three lines do. A four feels fine. Iowa State, Louisville and Wisconsin all deserve to be in that range, too.

Selection Sunday is just around the corner. March Madness can't come soon enough.



LINK to Full Article: https://www.ncaa.com/news/basketbal...tology-lets-break-down-top-16-mens-tournament

 

[Franisdaman]

Based on the Top 16 teams announced today, Andy Katz right now has Iowa as a 5 seed.

LINK: https://www.ncaa.com/news/basketbal...march-madness-field-68-predicted-after-top-16

 

[Franisdaman]

Comparing the Selection Committee's Top 16 to the NET Top 16:

Rank..Select Comm....NET Ranking
1......... Duke (E).............Virginia
2 .........Tenn(S)...............Gonzaga
3 .........Virginia (M)..........Duke
4 .........Gonzaga (W).......Tennessee
----------------------------------------------------
5 .........Kentucky(M).......Kentucky
6 .........Michigan(E)........Michigan
7 .........N Carolina(S)......Houston
8 .........Mich State(W).....North Carolina
----------------------------------------------------
9 .........Purdue(S)...........Michigan State
10 .........Kansas(W).......Virginia Tech
11 .........Houston(M).......Purdue
12 .........Marquette(E)....Wisconsin
----------------------------------------------------
13 .........Iowa State(E)....Iowa State
14 .........Nevada(S).........Louisville
15 .........Louisville(W)......Nevada
16 .........Wisconsin(M).....Texas Tech

 

[Franisdaman]

Comparing the Selection Committee's Top 16 to the NET Top 16:

Rank..Select Comm..NET
1......... Duke.............Virginia
2 .........Tenn..............Gonzaga
3 .........Virginia..........Duke
4 .........Gonzaga.......Tennessee
----------------------------------------------------
5 .........Kentucky.......Kentucky
6 .........Michigan.......Michigan
7 .........N Carolina.....Houston
8 .........Mich State.....North Carolina
----------------------------------------------------
9 .........Purdue...........Michigan State
10 .........Kansas........Virginia Tech
11 .........Houston.......Purdue
12 .........Marquette....Wisconsin
----------------------------------------------------
13 .........Iowa State....Iowa State
14 .........Nevada........Louisville
15 .........Louisville......Nevada
16 .........Wisconsin.....Texas Tech

initial observations:

Kansas is a 3 per Selection Committee but not a top 16 team per NET

Marquette is is a 3 per Selection Committee but not a top 16 team per NET

Conversely,

Texas Tech is #16 in NET but not a Top 16 team per the Selection Committee.

Virginia Tech is #10 in NET but not a Top 16 team per the Selection Committee.

Otherwise NET is close to what the Selection Committee is thinking

 

[HawkLand]

Hmmm. I guess I was wrong. I thought the committee would penalize Nevada for having 0 quad 1 games. Surprised to see them ranked even higher than their net.

 

[Franisdaman]

Hmmm. I guess I was wrong. I thought the committee would penalize Nevada for having 0 quad 1 games. Surprised to see them ranked even higher than their net.

Interesting that Andy Katz considers Iowa a 5 seed so we did not make the Top 16 but it appears the Selection Committee thinks we are somewhere between #17 and #20.

 

[Hawksfor3]

I'm very happy with Youtube TV. Good choice.

I like it so far. My wife doesn't care for it because it doesn't have the Hallmark Channel. I'm disappointed it doesn't have the History Channel, but I can live with that. They probably add channels from time to time but overall, It's good so far.

 

[Franisdaman]

In case you missed it, here is a story from the AP on the initial Selection Committee Top 16.

I found this interesting in terms of where Iowa might be ranked in the Selection Committee's minds (looks like we are OUT of their Top 20):

[Selection Committee Chair] Muir went on to say defending national champion Villanova was the last team out of the rankings [at #17], with Virginia Tech, Texas Tech and LSU also being considered. Kentucky, the top No. 2 seed, was placed in Kansas City instead of playing just down the road in Louisville, so it can't play No. 1 Duke until the Final Four.

@HawkLand , note that this is what they said about Nevada:

Nevada, No. 6 in the AP poll, was the No. 14 overall seed in the initial rankings after opening the season 21-1. The Wolf Pack's loss came at New Mexico on Jan. 5, and [Selection Committee Chair] Muir said they were close to earning a No. 3 seed.

http://www.espn.com/mens-college-ba...top-seed-no-1-tennessee-initial-ncaa-rankings

 

[HawkLand]

NET continues to do what NET does. Nevada and Buffalo rewarded with nice jumps after big wins against 130’s and 170’s ranked teams.

Iowa drops from 23 to 26. Iowa was 27 on 1/31 before the Michigan game. So a victory against a top 10 and a road top 50 win has netted us 1 spot in the rankings.

 

[TheTruthTheWholeTruth]

In case you missed it, here is a story from the AP on the initial Selection Committee Top 16.

I found this interesting in terms of where Iowa might be ranked in the Selection Committee's minds (looks like we are OUT of their Top 20):

[Selection Committee Chair] Muir went on to say defending national champion Villanova was the last team out of the rankings [at #17], with Virginia Tech, Texas Tech and LSU also being considered. Kentucky, the top No. 2 seed, was placed in Kansas City instead of playing just down the road in Louisville, so it can't play No. 1 Duke until the Final Four.

@HawkLand , note that this is what they said about Nevada:

Nevada, No. 6 in the AP poll, was the No. 14 overall seed in the initial rankings after opening the season 21-1. The Wolf Pack's loss came at New Mexico on Jan. 5, and [Selection Committee Chair] Muir said they were close to earning a No. 3 seed.

http://www.espn.com/mens-college-ba...top-seed-no-1-tennessee-initial-ncaa-rankings

LOL. So, sometimes resume matters like in the case of Marquette who was seeded 2 spots better than their NET ranking indicates. Or, like in the case of Nevada, NET and eye test matter more than the actual resume.

Could it be that the selection committee likes an exciting brand of basketball AND teams with “star players” get preference? I love the consistency in the selection process.

 

[HeRKeYHoPeFuL]

Yeah, I've been playing with formulas trying to build in a component to reward for Net, NCSOS, whatever I can, and I just cannot for the life of me find anything that has Tennessee at #2.

That's what makes things tough from a bracketology perspective, due to the human element of the committee, it never is just a straight metric that needs to be figured out, certain teams have different things weighted, and some get advantages, and some get disadvantages as those factors change with the biases for and against each team.

 

[TheTruthTheWholeTruth]

Yeah, I've been playing with formulas trying to build in a component to reward for Net, NCSOS, whatever I can, and I just cannot for the life of me find anything that has Tennessee at #2.

That's what makes things tough from a bracketology perspective, due to the human element of the committee, it never is just a straight metric that needs to be figured out, certain teams have different things weighted, and some get advantages, and some get disadvantages as those factors change with the biases for and against each team.

So much this. I hate to keep picking on Nevada but they shouldn’t be higher than a 5, let alone almost a 3 according to the committee. 0 Q1 wins? No problem!

That said, I moved them to a 4 last night because of the losses in front of them yesterday (ISU Villanova Wisconsin Louisville) so it took the perfect storm of events in order for me to, begrudgingly, move them up.

 

[Franisdaman]

Lets face it; who cares about the AP Poll or the Coaches poll? Those polls don't matter when it comes to whether you get selected to the NCAA Tournament or not.

What matters is your NET Ranking and the Quad 1 & Quad 2 wins you have.

The original post has been updated with what follows.

Today (Feb 11) Iowa is #26 in the NET Rankings. Right now are we looking at a 6 or 7(!?!) seed for the NCAA Tournament?

TWO things will be used by the NCAA Selection Committee when selecting the NCAA Tournament Teams & then seeding them:

(1) The NET ranking, an index that incorporates the most current evaluation measures; and

(2) A tighter definition of a quality win, classifying wins as Quad 1, Quad 2, Quad 3 and Quad 4.

The hope is that by using (1) and (2) we will have a more accurate selection and seeding procedure.


The quadrant system will still be used on team sheets, which sort results in the following manner:

To date, WHAT FOLLOWS are the Iowa (19-5) Quadrant WINS & LOSSES. NOTE that:

* The date of the opponent's NET Ranking is listed.

* Similar to the NET ranking, a Quad 1 win on the date listed might not be a Quad 1 win TODAY or in March (there has been fluidity). Time will tell.


SORTING OF #26 (NET Rank) IOWA'S RESULTS (19-5) INTO THE 4 QUADS:


Quadrant 1 (5-5): Home vs a 1-30 team, Neutral site vs 1-50, Away vs 1-75.

WINS
# 24 on Jan 16 (H) Iowa State
# 10 on Jan 16 (H) Nebraska
# 58 on Jan 16 (A) Northwestern
#2 on Jan 17 Michigan (H)
#30 on Jan 17 Indiana (A)

LOSSES
# 20 on Jan 16 (H) Wisconsin
#7 on Jan 16 (A) Michigan State
#17 on Jan 16 (A) Purdue
#6 on Jan 17 Michigan State (H)
#63 on Jan 17 Minnesota (A)


Quadrant 2 (6-0): Home vs a 31-75, Neutral site vs 51-100, Away vs 76-135.

WINS
#77 on Jan 16 (N) Oregon
#88 on Jan 16 (N) UConn
#53 on Jan 16 (H) Pittsburgh
# 36 on Jan 16 (H) Ohio State
#84 on Jan 17 (A) Penn State
#59 on Jan 17 Northwestern (H)


Quadrant 3 (1-0): Home vs a 76-160, Neutral site vs 101-200, Away vs 135-240.

WINS
#99 on Jan 17 Illinois (H)



Quadrant 4 (7-0): Home vs a 161-353, Neutral vs 201-353, Away vs 241-353

WINS
#234 on Jan 16 (H) UMKC
#192 on Jan 16 (H) Green Bay
#324 on Jan 16 (H) Alabama State
#217 on Jan 16 (N) UNI
#269 on Jan 16 (H) Western Carolina
#343 on Jan 16 (H) Savannah State
#316 on Jan 16 (H) Bryant


7 games left on the schedule:

Quadrant 1 (5 games): Home vs a 1-30 team, Neutral site vs 1-50, Away vs 1-75

#21 on Jan 17 Maryland (H)
#30 on Jan 17 Indiana (H)
#36 on Jan 17 Ohio State (A)
#22 on Jan 17 Wisconsin (A)
#11 on Jan 17 Nebraska (A)

.
Quadrant 2 (0 games): Home vs a 31-75, Neutral site vs 51-100, Away vs 76-135.

NONE LEFT ON THE SCHEDULE


Quadrant 3 (2 games): Home vs a 76-160, Neutral site vs 101-200, Away vs 135-240.

#136 on Jan 17 Rutgers (A)
#136 on Jan 17 Rutgers (H)


Quadrant 4 (0 games): Home vs a 161-353, Neutral vs 201-353, Away vs 241-353

NONE LEFT ON THE SCHEDULE

_______________________________

Previous NET Rankings for Iowa (notice the fluidity):

#26 on Feb 10
#24 on Feb 7
#22 on Feb 2 (after Feb 1's 15 pt home win vs Michigan)
#27 on Jan 30 & Jan 31
#28 on Jan 29
#30 on Jan 28
#25 on Jan 27
#24 on Jan 26
#22 on Jan 23
#25 on Jan 22
#25 on Jan 19
#24 on Jan 18
#29 on Jan 13
#35 on Jan 12

_______________________________


To see all teams' NET Rankings & quadrant results, open the link that follows, scroll down on the page that comes up & on the far right you will see NET Team Sheets - Games through [date]. Click on the most recent link or a previous date.

LINK: https://extra.ncaa.org/solutions/rpi/SitePages/Home.aspx


_______________________________

ALL B1G TEAMS' CURRENT (FEB 11) NET RANKINGS:

Rank..Previous..Road..Neutral..Home..Non Div 1
6 6 Michigan Big Ten 22-2 5-2 2-0 15-0 0-0
8 8 Michigan St. Big Ten 19-5 6-3 2-1 11-1 0-0
10 10 Purdue Big Ten 17-6 3-4 2-2 12-0 0-0
11 11 Wisconsin Big Ten 17-7 6-4 2-1 9-2 0-0
23 23 Maryland Big Ten 18-6 5-3 1-1 12-2 0-0
26 26 Iowa Big Ten 19-5 3-3 3-0 13-2 0-0
38 38 Ohio St. Big Ten 16-7 5-3 1-0 10-4 0-0
40 40 Nebraska Big Ten 13-11 2-6 2-1 8-4 1-0
47 47 Indiana Big Ten 13-11 2-7 1-0 10-4 0-0
58 58 Minnesota Big Ten 16-8 1-6 4-0 11-2 0-0
71 71 Northwestern Big Ten 12-11 1-6 2-1 9-4 0-0
73 73 Penn St. Big Ten 8-15 2-7 1-2 5-6 0-0
93 93 Illinois Big Ten 9-15 0-6 1-4 8-5 0-0
125 125 Rutgers Big Ten 11-12 2-7 0-0 9-5 0-0

 

[AuroraHawk]

NET continues to do what NET does. Nevada and Buffalo rewarded with nice jumps after big wins against 130’s and 170’s ranked teams.

Iowa drops from 23 to 26. Iowa was 27 on 1/31 before the Michigan game. So a victory against a top 10 and a road top 50 win has netted us 1 spot in the rankings.

Its a dynamic process.
ISU losing to TCU hurts Iowa's overall rating.
Nebraska continuing its losing hurts Iowa's overall rating.
Minnesota getting gobsmacked by MSU hurts Iowa's overall rating.

We jumped from #27 to #22 after beating Michigan.

Yesterday's results did Iowa no favors.

 

[HawkLand]

I get there are a million things factoring in. I get ISU losing hurts some. I don’t see how a conference team can effect it that much as they are losing to teams we ply as well. And somehow Nebbie is still #40. Good Lord. Apparently all of Nevada’s and Buffalo’s quad one wins all won yesterday. Oh wait.....

I’m guessing about 1/2 of the teams on everyone’s schedule are losing on a given week. Also, I’m guessing nearly half the teams ahead of us have lost since 1/31.

The day to day movement is just very surprising this late in the season. I can’t believe a win against a 130 ranked team can move you up from 3 spots for a team in the top 25.

While earlier I pointed out that it was surprising that k-state didn’t move up 1 spot after beating Kansas. It was pointed out to me it was because K-state was favored so upward movement shouldn’t be expected. Buff and Nevada are heavily favored every game.


I just enjoy monitoring and trying to figure it out, and it is more odd and surprising every week. The committee will get it close to correct in the long run and it doesn’t really matter. Im just surprised at how little sense it makes to me on a daily basis.

 

[Franisdaman]

Will our NET ranking change tomorrow?

I say it stays the same.

 

[StormHawk42]

Might drop one. Kenpom went down a couple.

 

[Franisdaman]

Might drop one. Kenpom went down a couple.

ughhhhh

 

[HeRKeYHoPeFuL]

I bet we drop a spot. Our efficiency and MOV were hurt. Our win percentages were helped slightly.

 

[Franisdaman]

Lets face it; who cares about the AP Poll or the Coaches poll? Those polls don't matter when it comes to whether you get selected to the NCAA Tournament or not.

What matters is your NET Ranking and the Quad 1 & Quad 2 wins you have.

The original post has been updated with what follows.

Today (Feb 12) Iowa is #26 in the NET Rankings. Right now are we looking at a 6 or 7(!?!) seed for the NCAA Tournament?

TWO things will be used by the NCAA Selection Committee when selecting the NCAA Tournament Teams & then seeding them:

(1) The NET ranking, an index that incorporates the most current evaluation measures; and

(2) A tighter definition of a quality win, classifying wins as Quad 1, Quad 2, Quad 3 and Quad 4.

The hope is that by using (1) and (2) we will have a more accurate selection and seeding procedure.


The quadrant system will still be used on team sheets, which sort results in the following manner:

To date, WHAT FOLLOWS are the Iowa (19-5) Quadrant WINS & LOSSES. NOTE that:

* The date of the opponent's NET Ranking is listed.

* Similar to the NET ranking, a Quad 1 win on the date listed might not be a Quad 1 win TODAY or in March (there has been fluidity). Time will tell.


SORTING OF #26 (NET Rank) IOWA'S RESULTS (19-5) INTO THE 4 QUADS:


Quadrant 1 (5-5): Home vs a 1-30 team, Neutral site vs 1-50, Away vs 1-75.

WINS
# 24 on Jan 16 (H) Iowa State
# 10 on Jan 16 (H) Nebraska
# 58 on Jan 16 (A) Northwestern
#2 on Jan 17 Michigan (H)
#30 on Jan 17 Indiana (A)

LOSSES
# 20 on Jan 16 (H) Wisconsin
#7 on Jan 16 (A) Michigan State
#17 on Jan 16 (A) Purdue
#6 on Jan 17 Michigan State (H)
#63 on Jan 17 Minnesota (A)


Quadrant 2 (6-0): Home vs a 31-75, Neutral site vs 51-100, Away vs 76-135.

WINS
#77 on Jan 16 (N) Oregon
#88 on Jan 16 (N) UConn
#53 on Jan 16 (H) Pittsburgh
# 36 on Jan 16 (H) Ohio State
#84 on Jan 17 (A) Penn State
#59 on Jan 17 Northwestern (H)


Quadrant 3 (1-0): Home vs a 76-160, Neutral site vs 101-200, Away vs 135-240.

WINS
#99 on Jan 17 Illinois (H)



Quadrant 4 (7-0): Home vs a 161-353, Neutral vs 201-353, Away vs 241-353

WINS
#234 on Jan 16 (H) UMKC
#192 on Jan 16 (H) Green Bay
#324 on Jan 16 (H) Alabama State
#217 on Jan 16 (N) UNI
#269 on Jan 16 (H) Western Carolina
#343 on Jan 16 (H) Savannah State
#316 on Jan 16 (H) Bryant


7 games left on the schedule:

Quadrant 1 (5 games): Home vs a 1-30 team, Neutral site vs 1-50, Away vs 1-75

#21 on Jan 17 Maryland (H)
#30 on Jan 17 Indiana (H)
#36 on Jan 17 Ohio State (A)
#22 on Jan 17 Wisconsin (A)
#11 on Jan 17 Nebraska (A)

.
Quadrant 2 (0 games): Home vs a 31-75, Neutral site vs 51-100, Away vs 76-135.

NONE LEFT ON THE SCHEDULE


Quadrant 3 (2 games): Home vs a 76-160, Neutral site vs 101-200, Away vs 135-240.

#136 on Jan 17 Rutgers (A)
#136 on Jan 17 Rutgers (H)


Quadrant 4 (0 games): Home vs a 161-353, Neutral vs 201-353, Away vs 241-353

NONE LEFT ON THE SCHEDULE

_______________________________

Previous NET Rankings for Iowa (notice the fluidity):

#26 on Feb 10
#24 on Feb 7
#22 on Feb 2 (after Feb 1's 15 pt home win vs Michigan)
#27 on Jan 30 & Jan 31
#28 on Jan 29
#30 on Jan 28
#25 on Jan 27
#24 on Jan 26
#22 on Jan 23
#25 on Jan 22
#25 on Jan 19
#24 on Jan 18
#29 on Jan 13
#35 on Jan 12

_______________________________


To see all teams' NET Rankings & quadrant results, open the link that follows, scroll down on the page that comes up & on the far right you will see NET Team Sheets - Games through [date]. Click on the most recent link or a previous date.

LINK: https://extra.ncaa.org/solutions/rpi/SitePages/Home.aspx


_______________________________

ALL B1G TEAMS' CURRENT (FEB 12) NET RANKINGS:

Rank..Previous..Road..Neutral..Home..Non Div 1
7 6 Michigan Big Ten 22-2 5-2 2-0 15-0 0-0
8 8 Michigan St. Big Ten 19-5 6-3 2-1 11-1 0-0
10 10 Purdue Big Ten 17-6 3-4 2-2 12-0 0-0
11 11 Wisconsin Big Ten 17-7 6-4 2-1 9-2 0-0
23 23 Maryland Big Ten 18-6 5-3 1-1 12-2 0-0
26 26 Iowa Big Ten 19-5 3-3 3-0 13-2 0-0
37 38 Ohio St. Big Ten 16-7 5-3 1-0 10-4 0-0
40 40 Nebraska Big Ten 13-11 2-6 2-1 8-4 1-0
48 47 Indiana Big Ten 13-11 2-7 1-0 10-4 0-0
58 58 Minnesota Big Ten 16-8 1-6 4-0 11-2 0-0
69 71 Northwestern Big Ten 12-11 1-6 2-1 9-4 0-0
75 73 Penn St. Big Ten 8-15 2-7 1-2 5-6 0-0
94 93 Illinois Big Ten 9-15 0-6 1-4 8-5 0-0
126 125 Rutgers Big Ten 11-12 2-7 0-0 9-5 0-0

 

[HeRKeYHoPeFuL]

Wow, no change for us, Northwestern, Ohio State or Indiana. Is NET stabilizing? I would have expected Ohio State to move up getting the road victory that they weren't expected to get.

 

[StormHawk42]

Wow, no change for us, Northwestern, Ohio State or Indiana. Is NET stabilizing? I would have expected Ohio State to move up getting the road victory that they weren't expected to get.

I think there was a glitch this morning. There was not a single move for any team which I think has to be impossible if any team plays. I could be wrong. Just looks weird.

 

[anon_bb9wlf9kj42py]

Wow, no change for us, Northwestern, Ohio State or Indiana. Is NET stabilizing? I would have expected Ohio State to move up getting the road victory that they weren't expected to get.

I think it is. Quite frankly I expected a bigger drop for ISU getting absolutely piss pounded by #35. 3 spots is not much.

 

[mtdew_fever]

Total BS that Iowa St is stil higher on the NET rankings. The Hawks beat them straight up and have a better overall win.

 

[TheTruthTheWholeTruth]

Total BS that Iowa St is stil higher on the NET rankings. The Hawks beat them straight up and have a better overall win.

That’s not how NET works.

 

[Franisdaman]

Wow, no change for us, Northwestern, Ohio State or Indiana. Is NET stabilizing? I would have expected Ohio State to move up getting the road victory that they weren't expected to get.

I think there was a glitch this morning. There was not a single move for any team which I think has to be impossible if any team plays. I could be wrong. Just looks weird.

Yeah, I just checked again and there was no movement for Iowa and any of the B1G teams

 

[HeRKeYHoPeFuL]

Seems like a delay this morning for the updated rankings. Given the light slate last night, I wonder if they figured out there was a glitch from Sunday's results and are working to fix it. The women's info has been out for hours now.