It was one of those “half full half empty” type of scenariosI forget. Did Bert inherit a ton of talent that just didn't put it together under Smith? Ie, the cupboard was fairly full when he arrived?
It was one of those “half full half empty” type of scenariosI forget. Did Bert inherit a ton of talent that just didn't put it together under Smith? Ie, the cupboard was fairly full when he arrived?
They don't need to blitz much. Just a few well-timed A gap blitzes to confuse our fat linemen, and make sure to have a defender crashing the backside on our stretch zone runs to either run down the line unblocked and make the tackle or to destroy Petras for a sack on our PA.Illinois won’t need to blitz to slow down the run game. They had to against Wisconsin to overwhelm their OL, but such measures aren’t needed against us.
An Illinois win cashes my over 4.5 RSW bet, but I would prefer if they wait until later in the season to do it.
Competent coaching makes a big difference.It was one of those “half full half empty” type of scenarios
Lovie recruited some decent talent that Bert inherited. I think the biggest change that Bert made is bringing a winning attitude and playing smarter football.I forget. Did Bert inherit a ton of talent that just didn't put it together under Smith? Ie, the cupboard was fairly full when he arrived?
Mertz is slightly more accurate, but more prone to making bad decisions.From what little I have seen of Mertz, he is a slight better version of our very own Petras so this does not bode well for us Sat. Nite…
Scared of Illinois.
We are turning into Nebraska.
Not even kidding.
Our run defense is growing increasingly suspect as the season progresses and teams see more film of us.Wisconsin didn't play well. I don't think Illinois will run all over us. We'll need to sustain drives and avoid turnovers. I think we are starting to gel a bit on the offensive line in the running game and Luke Lachay is now another legitimate option at TE. Iowa wins 20 - 13.
Our run defense is suspect after a game against a top 5 team? Ok….Our run defense is growing increasingly suspect as the season progresses and teams see more film of us.
Let's see if Phil can adjust like he does with Purdue WRs.......................
That is the exact way I play a defense against Iowa.This was the situation at halftime, where Illinois led 14-10. And, yes, it ended up being an embarrassing loss.
Which is exactly the same as what I said............or is it?Our run defense is suspect after a game against a top 5 team? Ok….
Which is exactly the same as what I said............or is it?
The writing was on the wall before this game for those that watched.
And I would agree with you..............Guess I’m going to strongly disagree that we are weak against the run.
In 1985 Miami Dolphins had the same problem with da bears. Shula had Marino roll out every play. Dolphins beat those nasty BearsSo, how does Brian attack their D?
Or, better yet, how would you attack their D?
I have not watched any of Wisconsin; is their OL as bad as ours? Normally, Wisconsin can still rush on an opponent, no matter how much stacking of the box there is.
This is Bert's 2nd year. Pretty impressive what he's done there so far.
Yes, but they will be all slow developing playsIowa coaches aren't dumb? They will come out throwing and throw 11 out of the first 15 scripted plays and score at least 3 points.....Your Christmas present early....
And I would agree with you..............![]()
I don't think anyone should suggest we're weak against the run.
That only applies to Iowa (and Nebraska).I thought it was impossible to have a good team after making a coaching change? Guess I've been believing a lie for 15 years.
I'd guess after the bye, same with Vines (WR).Stopping the run is crucial. When is Black back?
Well we are glad Illinois lost that big 10 game to IU.Illinois got hosed against Indiana, too. Should have won that one.
Iowa has the exact same problems Wisconsin has, only Iowa is worse at it. At this point I'm debating whether or not I'm even going to bother to watch. I feel like I already know how the game is going to play out and I'm not sure I need that aggravation in my life.
It's hard to see why illini would go away from the formula they used against wisky on D. Selling out to stop the run is the go to move for any D coordinator against Iowa anyway. Stuff the run game and then deal with a QB who can't run and is more easily spooked than a long tailed cat in a room full of rocking chairs.
I don't even know what this is supposed to mean. Are you trying to make some sort of dig or something?I always figured you to be the cut and run type.
So Iowa, who can't seem to score against anyone, is going to put 17-24 on the best defense they have played against this season? I don't see that happening.Continued improvement in the run game (I like our improved blocking and running backs) PLUS lets hope to get some improved Pass Pro. I don't see Illinois scoring 31 on us. may 10-14 points, with Iowa 17-24 at least. Iowa wins 24 - 10.
well, it's not like they've played a murder's row either.So Iowa, who can't seem to score against anyone, is going to put 17-24 on the best defense they have played against this season? I don't see that happening.
That used to be our formula.From ESPN's game story:
Yesterday the Illini beat host Wisconsin by 24 points (34-10); in comparison, tOSU beat Wisconsin by 31. The Illini won in Madison for the first time since 2002. They play a physical brand of football and beat the Badgers at their own game.
Illinois got 17 points off 3 Wisconsin turnovers & scored the game's final 27 points.
They held Wisconsin to 2 yds rushing on 24 carries.
Chase Brown rushed for 129 yards. Brown, who entered the day with an FBS-leading 151 yards rushing per game, produced his sixth straight 100-yard performance.
Illinois' winning formula:
* The Illini outrushed Wisconsin 137-2
* They made fewer mistakes than their opponent
* They were more physical on both sides of the ball