ADVERTISEMENT

Next Year's Team

Nice to have the ole "But the '60s and '70s" argument from the old timers every once in a while. Reminds me of my Dad talking about the great Cleveland Browns teams from the pre-Super Bowl era.

Why didn't Iowa football go into the doldrums for 20 years after Hayden retired? Maybe because the program is now stronger than it was before he ever got here? And it's even stronger now. I have no idea why so many fans are scared to death that the program is going to fall off a cliff as soon as KF leaves. The program is way bigger than him. Did you ever consider that Iowa might get even better?

It's ok to consider moving on from a 70-year-old, 26-year head coach. Don't be such a chicken sh*t.
You think the BF years were the "dark" times, with three ten-win seasons and no record worse than 8 wins you simply are ignoring the various realities. The 60s and 70s rolling debacle is to remind those who didn't live through those seasons just how dark the dark days can get. Do you remember firing Dr. Davis, the career victory leader at Iowa? Twenty-five years later the MBB has not reached the point where Dr. Davis left it.

You really should change the avatar. Still complaining about someone fired over a year ago seems obsessive compulsive, and not in a good way. But you do you.
 
It hasn’t.
Conference winning percentage Dr. Tom’s last 5 seasons: 57%

Conference winning percentage Fran’s last 5 seasons: 58%

Fran’s teams made the NCAA tournament 75% of the time in those years (would have been 80% were it not for Covid) while Dr Tom only made it 60% of the time.

Yes, Dr. Tom won a couple games in the tourney in his lame duck year, but’s let’s not act like Iowa was some kind of blue blood when he was shown the door.
 
Next year is probably another 8 or 9 win season. Every year, Internet experts predict a terrible season, they are wrong repeatedly. We are what we are.
Doesn't have to be this way.

8-9 wins against the lower half of the conference along with zero exciting out-of-conference victories does absolutely nothing for most of us.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Hawktagonapus
One could definitely make a case that Iowa hasn't gotten back to the Dr. Tom level.

Regardless, it was terrible move at the time
The original assertion was about where Dr. Tom left the program. If you look at the records, Iowa is in pretty much the same position now as when he left the program.
 
Let’s also not forget that the talent level on the roster was going to be pretty atrocious in 1999-2000. Through his poor recruiting, Dr. Tom really had the program headed in the wrong direction.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LetsGoHawks83
The original assertion was about where Dr. Tom left the program. If you look at the records, Iowa is in pretty much the same position now as when he left the program.
Iowa made the Sweet 16 in Davis' last season.

So, as I said, one could certainly make the argument that Iowa has not reached the level it was at when Davis left.

So, your original assertion that Uncle Teddy's statement was not at all accurate, is not at all accurate
 
Iowa made the Sweet 16 in Davis' last season.

So, as I said, one could certainly make the argument that Iowa has not reached the level it was at when Davis left.

So, your original assertion that Uncle Teddy's statement was not at all accurate, is not at all accurate
So the entire process of judging where a program is at consists of looking at the results of two games?
 
One could definitely make a case that Iowa hasn't gotten back to the Dr. Tom level.

Regardless, it was terrible move at the time
Well, we didn't have social media in the late 90's, but if we had Davis would have been roasted just like Fran. Every fan I talked to in those years wanted him gone. Iowa had become stale, predictable and frankly the fans were bored. Davis had some big recruiting misses and fans believed he had gotten too comfortable at Iowa.

Bowlsby cut the cord with Davis due to fan pressure to have the program "take the next step". Everyone was excited about the Alford hire. Sadly, Davis had to coach a lame duck year. He was treated like dirty laundry. But I think Bowlsby had Alford in this back pocket.

For the most part the accomplishments of Davis at the end of his time at Iowa were similar to what Fran has done - which is also similar to Iowa basketball achievements in the last 50 years, with a few notable exceptions.

I think Iowa can do better than Fran. I think the football program needs some new blood.

But I'm not willing to bet money that things get much better in either program under a new coach.
 
Next year Iowa football will be more about the schedule and less about the team,.. Gonna be a rough ride.
 
Doesn't have to be this way.

8-9 wins against the lower half of the conference along with zero exciting out-of-conference victories does absolutely nothing for most of us.
So on a year to year basis, whats different about Iowa then Wisconsin, Minnesota, Illinois, Indiana, Purdue, MSU, NW, Rutgers, Maryland Etc..Not just last year, but over the last 5-10 years. So Basically any team not named OSU, Michigan or PSU
 
I'm not sold that the OL will be worse. Posters have spent the last several years bitching about Richman, Colby, and Jones (who as a unit led the B1G in rushing), ad now their gone. I think with those guys who had over 100 starts Kirk stuck with them. Not sure that Lauck, Peiper, Borud, Fox, Myslinski or Noland can't step in with Dunker, Elsbury, ad Stephens and do well. At LB we start over just like we do EVERY few years, and we always come up with the guys. Harrell and Sharer have been understudies for three years just like Higgens was. Next man in......
I’m seeing some comments that Logan Jones may come back next year? Is that a possibility?
 
🤣 Not at all accurate.
Wasn't Dr. Davis last season a Sweet 16? Didn't Iowa win more NCAA games in the 90s (leaving the "inherited talent" argument aside for now) than in the 25 seasons since Dr. Davis left. That last team had some good young talent and the recruiting class looked good.
 
Wasn't Dr. Davis last season a Sweet 16? Didn't Iowa win more NCAA games in the 90s (leaving the "inherited talent" argument aside for now) than in the 25 seasons since Dr. Davis left. That last team had some good young talent and the recruiting class looked good.
But Bowlsby didn't like him at that point.
 
Wasn't Dr. Davis last season a Sweet 16? Didn't Iowa win more NCAA games in the 90s (leaving the "inherited talent" argument aside for now) than in the 25 seasons since Dr. Davis left. That last team had some good young talent and the recruiting class looked good.
These would have been the returning players for the ‘99-00 season if Dr Tom stuck around:

Dean Oliver
Ryan Luehrsmann
Jason Price
Kyle Galloway
Joey Range
Duez Henderson
Rod Thompson
Guy Rucker
Jacob Jaacks

That’s a team that finishes last in the Big Ten.

And what recruiting class are you referring to? There was no recruiting Dr Tom’s final season because he was a lame duck. Seems like you’re just making things up to suit your narrative.
 
These would have been the returning players for the ‘99-00 season if Dr Tom stuck around:

Dean Oliver
Ryan Luehrsmann
Jason Price
Kyle Galloway
Joey Range
Duez Henderson
Rod Thompson
Guy Rucker
Jacob Jaacks

That’s a team that finishes last in the Big Ten.

And what recruiting class are you referring to? There was no recruiting Dr Tom’s final season because he was a lame duck. Seems like you’re just making things up to suit your narrative.
Why didn’t it finish last the next year? Alford coached them up to 7th?
 
It’s absurd to not acknowledge that one coach took over a roster with 7 future NBA players while the other took the helm at a program that was dead in the water.
I don’t believe I did that. Please don’t confuse what you think I meant with what I actually typed. Pointing out flaws in your premise does not mean I compared the two. Totally different situations.
One won more NCAA games than the other after each of their inherited situations passed
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT