Like you have friends.My friends at VATech think that’s hilarious.
Like you have friends.My friends at VATech think that’s hilarious.
Hey look, wee willie is here with Caels manhood running off his chin spouting pro ped state shit that only him and his ped state buddies find funny. Go away willie, your place is on your favorite teams wrestling site. We don't want you here.it sounds as if you guys are saying psu recruits better, thus they are cheating.
Is that your point?
Yet, better collegiate credentials than all Iowa wrestlers (except Spencer) combined, in that same time frame.One of the best recruits in recent memory. One national title and couldn’t even beat a cokehead in the finals.
Yet, better collegiate credentials than all Iowa wrestlers (except Spencer) combined, in that same time frame.
Don’t forget running the go to web site during B1G and NCAA.You do realize that the Penn State Wrestling Club is just a fan club for us old guys, right? We pay yearly dues, and for that we get benefits like reduced travel costs to most duals, B10’s and nationals. We have luncheons before duals, help with the awards banquet, etc.. Any money left over after the season gets donated to The University.
ShhhhhI may have missed it, but I haven't seen any mention of the days when Roy Carver bankrolled the HWC. Similar allegations floated around at that time regarding Gable and the Hawks.
who said i have a 'nonchalant' view of their recruiting? they recruit very well.I agree with everything except your nonchalant view of PSU recruiting. It is SOO off to the point that you appear to INTENTIONALLY shift the narrative.
1.) PSU recruits extreme quality over quantity.
2.)PSU recruits almost solely on NEEDS and almost always gets who they are recruiting.
3.)PSU recruits and STARTS more top 10 recruits by a LARGE margin.
I don’t see how the above can be ignored.
125:Howard #7 2020 Steen was as high as 12 now 29 2021
133:RBY #12 2018
141:Lee #9 2017
149:Bartlett #4 2020 Van Ness #4 2021
157: Berge before injury retirement #6 2017
165:Lee #20 2018 Facundo #2 2021
174:Starocci #9 2019
184:Brooks #2 2018
197:Beard #11 Dean transfer Finalsit
285:Kerkvliet #1 2019
So, barring uncontrollable injuries, their starting lineup next year could be
#7 overall
12 overall
9 overall
4 overall
6 overall with Berge or 4 if Van Ness
2 overall
9 overall
2 overall
11 overall or a transfer finalist
1 overall
In what WORLD does ANY other school compare in recruiting to that? I mean it isn’t even FRICKING ClOSE!!!!!
you can't extrapolate this, can you?This 100%. Comparing schools or judging class rankings by # of top 100 recruits is completely backwards. This isn't football.
And they bring in more Top 100 recruits than anyone.
I fixed your typoit sounds as if you guys are Paying psu recruits better, thus they are cheating.
Is that your point?
I forgot, by the way, when did Kemerer win a national championship? Last I recall Mark went to three finals in three years and won a championship. Kemerer one final in 4 years and no championships.
he just reiterated that's not what he did. You retarded?it's about the money. you know, the thing you wasted your time on reporting to compliance offices, lmao.
you can't extrapolate this, can you?
it's not about rankings. it's about the money. you know, the thing you wasted your time on reporting to compliance offices, lmao.
If PSU brought in 2 recruits in the Top 20 at 60% each and Lehigh brought in 6 top 100's at 25%, Lehigh spent more.
PSU isn't necessarily spending more, they're recruiting better, which is their freakin job.
0.0, blutarski.
rebutt what i posted dumdum
If you are saying that it only gets reduced travel expenses then that is really an interesting expense.
Willie you're all over the place. I was replying to MSU who said he agrees with everything you said in the post that he was quoting except for your nonchalant view of PSU recruiting. I think he's spot on. Iowa fans have been saying that PSU has done the best at recruiting the last decade by a good margin. Any recruiting class ranking that ranks a team with a bunch of 30-100 recruits above a team with 1-2 top 10 can't be taken seriously.
PSU has gotten more top 10 overall recruits than any other school in the last decade and I imagine it's not that close.
Who gives a fk if NC state had a recruiting class with 15 guys ranked 30-100. We all know how NCAA tournament scoring works. I thought this concept was well understood by now?
Unless scholarship distributions become public, it's all speculation. I believe your claim about Ramos competing at 30% scholly his senior year is true, but how many national champs are doing that? I suppose it helps if a school can promise them big RTC money in 9 months after they graduate. That's the shady component wrestling fans have been inquiring about for years.
Don't get mad at fans for asking questions and scratching their head. If they want to squelch the speculation, then open up the books. There's a lot of money moving around in collegiate athletics and it's all under the table with no NCAA oversight.
I stand by presumed innocence until evidence of guilt, but that doesn't mean people can't ask questions.
If ya want to shut people up, do some journalism and report the facts to us. I might even sub to rokfin.
You do realize I responded to specific things YOU posted in this thread, right? Also, I CLEARLY answered the main topic of the thread in saying I DO NOT believe they have been cheating.it's not me that's all over the place, it's this thread.
How bout we...idk...stick to the topic/title of the thread.
every 'you're disingenuous" response is because i'm sticking to the topic (cheating) and you guys are talking a recruiting efficacy.
your point regarding rankings is faulty 1) b/c i never did that and 2) that addresses recruiting efficacy.
and my point about 30-100 is very germane. NOT IN PERFORMANCE! (you guys can't seem to grasp that).
but IN BUDGET. They cost money, ya know.
see the PSU-Lehigh hypothetical.
it's not rocket science and yet there's a thread every single off season about cheating and slush funds.
it's not me that's all over the place, it's this thread.
How bout we...idk...stick to the topic/title of the thread.
every 'you're disingenuous" response is because i'm sticking to the topic (cheating) and you guys are talking a recruiting efficacy.
your point regarding rankings is faulty 1) b/c i never did that and 2) that addresses recruiting efficacy.
and my point about 30-100 is very germane. NOT IN PERFORMANCE! (you guys can't seem to grasp that).
but IN BUDGET. They cost money, ya know.
see the PSU-Lehigh hypothetical.
it's not rocket science and yet there's a thread every single off season about cheating and slush funds.
IT took Guts to do this, He put everything into that move and when it did not work- I knew it was over as he exerted everything (Physical and Emotional) to make a statement. I loved the attempt-- next time he knew better as the different result showed.
Not true! that was a Rumor Marks Parents did not pay for all his school..PSU got Hall for free. His parents paid for his school. Made good money doing camps on the side.
VTECH was doing great until the Brands screwed them and took all their studs with them. HMMMMMIn case you missed it, the reason ISU fell apart when Cael left is because he destroyed the program - pushed Bobby Douglas out and left for PSU with all his stud recruits. Iowa State was doing just fine until Cael crapped on them.
1. The president of wrestling for life should be smart enough to stay out of these conversations.I may have missed it, but I haven't seen any mention of the days when Roy Carver bankrolled the HWC. Similar allegations floated around at that time regarding Gable and the Hawks.
First things first, Vodka, thanks for getting a healthy convo back on track.Willie why do you think that there is speculation of funny money? The speculation didn't begin just because NLWC received a massive donation. It started because the unprecedented sustained level of recruiting. And the rankings (or more accurately - "quality of recruit") matter because a dude ranked 50th can't demand a full ride from all of the top programs in the way that a dude ranked #1 can.
There's more Ramoses on top tier team rosters than there are full ride guys. full ride guys at top programs nearly don't exist. 30% is really really low but i promise you there are tons of NCAA finalists on sub 70%.Idk why the **** Ramos would agree to 30% as a senior unless he knew he'd be getting paid from the HWC after. That's the gray area that we're questioning. If post graduation promises ("we're not saying we'll take care of you after you graduate but most of our wrestlers in your position get signed by our RTC for x salary") are allowed, then certainly the school with the largest RTC funding has a significant competitive advantage in a sport with scholarship restrictions in place for the sole purpose of maintaining competitive fairness.
FB and BB are all full rides in DI. you can't take less.Do any first round NFL draft pick college football players agree to a 30% scholarship their senior year in order to help their program because they know they'll be paid big in less than a year? I have no idea, genuinely asking.
for sure! i posted on here several times that if PSU or anyone else were bending rules i wouldnt fall over in shock.There's definitely a lot of gray in college athletics. What's right/wrong, fair/unfair, cheating/wisely taking advantage of the rules? Idk the answers, but I don't see any issues with asking the questions and having the conversations.
Tony Ramos took 3rd and 2nd at NCAA's and was on 30% scholly as a SR at iowa. and yet if you buy the rhetoric here, Carter Starocci is on a full, got a porsche, nightly filet mignon and a 5 year post college NLWC position.
Very interesting. Thank you for sharing. This might be the first good thing to come out of this thread.In a nutshell, this article has scholarship equivalencies based on FOIA reports for most DI wrestling programs. PSU only gave $$ to 14 wrestlers, and used aid equivalency of 9.79 scholarships. Iowa gave money to 21 athletes and used equivalent of 10.34 scholarships. The article explains why that may appear more that the 9.9 allowed. PSU gives more money to fewer athlete, thus being attractive to high level kids who are good enough to get aid.
Scholarship Amounts
This website has collected some of the financial reports schools are required to file, and scholarship info is included.https://www.extrapointsmb.com/foia-directory/ Here are the scholarship amounts listed for the schools with wrestling. Youll see some are above 9.9 for what must be some sort of ...board.themat.com
Idk, the way I look at it is to view how many recruits a school has who come in and place top 4 (and especially top 2) as freshmen and sophomores (and especially as freshmen). Not all highly ranked recruits are equal.PSU's recruiting isn't THAT far ahead. Ultimately it's math. 9.9 and how they fit into it. Elite guys are taking less to go to the PSU, Iowa, tOSU's, and OKST's of the world.
i'm all ears. explain.Willie, I think you're obtuse intentionally.
well then you don't know how this works. not to mention 60 percent for 13 guys with 2 left over is fuggin great.Not sure I buy schools commonly giving 25% to guys ranked below 50. The question isn't even about how PSU divides their scholarships it's how they can get that many elite guys to go there for way less than than the going rate for top 10 overall recruits. Even if you used the previously mentioned 60% number which is on the low side for blue chip recruits, many of which were out of state you would burn through all but 2 of the 9.9 on 13 guys on a 40 man roster.
For the 37th time, I am an ACC fan first and foremost. That said, I prefer Iowa among the top teams, and I like this board.Wasn’t your head coach the guy who lost his senior year eligibility in high school for taking part in a gang bang? Gable recruited him anyway...but hey you guys were winning back then, and a win is a win. And love the Bael stuff. My friends at VATech think that’s hilarious.