I've been seeing some fans at Louisville games and others. So I was wondering if it's a league rule because of different states and their rules , or do Big Ten teams have any say, depending on their states rules?
Feels like if Drake can do 2,000 in their 7,000 person arena, no reason you couldn’t do 4-5,000 in the big B1G arenas.
I know. I was using that as a reference in general. B1G has taken it too extreme.Iowa St., Drake and UNI have more fans than we do. Our governor would not care about fans at Iowa so it's all on the Big Ten.
I was there yesterday and there was plenty of room to social distance. Absolutely no reason Iowa couldn’t do 3,500 safely.Feels like if Drake can do 2,000 in their 7,000 person arena, no reason you couldn’t do 4-5,000 in the big B1G arenas.
I was there yesterday and there was plenty of room to social distance. Absolutely no reason Iowa couldn’t do 3,500 safely.
Mostly ceiling fans.Iowa does have some fans at its home games.
The big ten commish blows
Fake crowd noise and cardboard cutouts are irritating. The teams seem to do a good job playing in that enviornment. But it makes you wonder how badly they would like to see at least some fans.
Kevin Warren should not have a job considering how much he botched this from the get go.This right here. We could’ve easily had 10-15k for football and have a couple of thousand for b-ball but our incompetent commissioner Kevin Warren won’t allow it for any school. Even though it has worked well for other schools like those in the acc, sec and big 12.
Iowa does have some fans at its home games.
I thought Governor Kimmy opened up Iowa to allow large crowds at events like this.
I thought Governor Kimmy opened up Iowa to allow large crowds at events like this.
I agree some noise is ok, but the Wisconsin game on Sunday was way to much when you see empty stands.I’m all for (a limited number of) fans at this point, but I actually like the piped in crowd noise during TV broadcasts, provided it’s at a reasonable noise level. If it’s too loud, it’s indeed cringy, but I frickin’ hate games on ESPN where it’s dead silent. This is a bizarre season, and when you’re watching on TV and can’t see the empty stands but can hear a faint buzz of a crowd, it ALMOST makes it feel a tad normal!
Exactly it’s clear that many on these forums have been fortunate and it’s made them ignorantWe ARE in the middle of a global pandemic that's killed half a million people in the US alone. Anything we can do to slow the spread saves people's lives...and we still get to enjoy the games on TV. My otherwise healthy 80 year old aunt died of it. A 38 year old teacher from a small school district in Iowa died of it, along with over 5000 others. These are people with families and friends. While it's not possible to prevent all transmission of it, I think it makes sense to do all we can to slow the spread and save lives, even though it means some temporary, minor inconveniences. Again, we still get to have a BB season and can watch on TV. Wouldn't it be a pisser to lose a good friend or loved one because of a BB game?
I thought Governor Kimmy opened up Iowa to allow large crowds at events like this.
Where the heck did find that picture of him actually doing something?? 99% of the game he would just sit in his chair like a spectator.Just like the Lickliter days!
![]()
We ARE in the middle of a global pandemic that's killed half a million people in the US alone. Anything we can do to slow the spread saves people's lives...and we still get to enjoy the games on TV. My otherwise healthy 80 year old aunt died of it. A 38 year old teacher from a small school district in Iowa died of it, along with over 5000 others. These are people with families and friends. While it's not possible to prevent all transmission of it, I think it makes sense to do all we can to slow the spread and save lives, even though it means some temporary, minor inconveniences. Again, we still get to have a BB season and can watch on TV. Wouldn't it be a pisser to lose a good friend or loved one because of a BB game?
The science says The risk of socially distanced healthy people and young people is minuscule.
adding 4-5K people in CHA is not a huge risk factor....
plus, new case rates are falling, vax are up, mortality rates falling...
(that said, I’m sorry for those that have lost family members)
Well, if it were only that easy - "I'm healthy so I don't have to worry about getting really ill and I can go where I want and do what I want." You can carry the virus without having symptoms and infect your barber, let's say. Your barber gets COVID but doesn't get really ill. They infect the bartender who then goes home and infects their child or grandparent whose immune system is compromised. And they die, or have life-long lung damage, etc. Why not all of us stop whining, suck it up, and do what we can until more are vaccinated - wear a mask, socially distance, wash hands, get vaccinated, only go places when we really have to - work, get gas, grocery store, pharmacy - and do drive thru at as many of these as possible. It's not so hard. The better we do at this, the earlier the virus will stop spreading and we can get back to normal with as few deaths as possible.The science says The risk of socially distanced healthy people and young people is minuscule.
adding 4-5K people in CHA is not a huge risk factor....
plus, new case rates are falling, vax are up, mortality rates falling...
(that said, I’m sorry for those that have lost family members)
Maybe the barber has no one else to deliver meds, etc. to their grandparent. Maybe they don't do so daily.Confirmed cases have fallen by 200% since Jan 5th and are still plummeting...
Question, why, as in your example, would the barber who sees untested people daily, be daily visiting with grandparent with immune compromised conditions?
Then there is CHA services workers who have all lost their jobs because CHA has closed, How do they put food on table?
This is a complex dilemma for sure, and shutting down everything is an option, but there are societal costs to that option that, at sometime will weigh cost more...
the B1G should open up the arenas for limited fans, like all the other conferences and NBA has done.
Maybe, I think I‘ll just leave it here, I think there can be safe limited fans in attendance (like the majority of the conferences/nba) and I think the science shows these fans are limited in risk (if you go to the game, don’t see grandma for 7-10 days), if you take care of grandma then don’t go to the game.Maybe the barber has no one else to deliver meds, etc. to their grandparent. Maybe they don't do so daily.
I don't know what the governor's current position might be. Iowa State is limiting attendance to about 10% at Hilton, which works out to around 1,500 fans. This season, that's a crowd.I thought Governor Kimmy opened up Iowa to allow large crowds at events like this.
I agree that 4-5 thousand fans doesn't sound like much, but if you really think about it that would mean there would be two open seats between each person (probably less than 3' apart) and no difference in front or behind you. And this virus spreads most readily, I think, thru droplets in the air, specifically thru talking, yelling, singing. 4-5 thousand fans packed in would be a super spreader event. Now, does that mean only 1 person dies as a result? Maybe. Maybe none, Maybe 2. Not worth the risk IMO. Let's wait a few months until 70-80% of us have been vaccinated, then get back to normal.The science says The risk of socially distanced healthy people and young people is minuscule.
adding 4-5K people in CHA is not a huge risk factor....
plus, new case rates are falling, vax are up, mortality rates falling...
(that said, I’m sorry for those that have lost family members)
Why can't 3-4k people do this in a basketball arena? If 500 can watch high school games wearing masks, why can't NCAA teams.wear a mask, socially distance, wash hands,