No more Ruduck threads...
- Thread starter spoke8
- Start date
Two things:
Iowa > Michigan > Iowa State
and
OP is a Michigan fan......just sayin. Maybe you knew that...maybe not....
Michigan got better with Rudock and Iowa looks better without him. Win-Win
Says the ISU fan lurking on the Iowa board wondering what others are saying about his team.
So true....what I REALLY don't get is why would someone lurk on someone else's board when their own team is obviously headed for a 2 or 3 win season? I just don't get that at all.
This guy.....LOL....the only thing ISU had a chance at beating Iowa at this year was vollyball and they can't even do that anymore....move on lil cy, move on......
Isu fans on an Iowa board, what is your point being on here then whining that there are ISU threads on here. You should be honored there is any conversation on here about your sh!tty team and school.
So a Cyclown fan lurking on the IOWA board responds with trash talking to a Meechigan fan trolling on an IOWA board. And who has little brother syndrome????
You don't know how bad Michigan's QB situation was pre-Rudock. He's far from a superstar but he's still a huge upgrade over what we were going to have. Without him our presumed starter would be Shane Morris, who completed 35% of his passes last year for 3.2 yards per attempt.
The difference is simple, it's that athletes around him. You don't have that (unfortunately) at Iowa, so you need a QB that can really make plays, not be a game "manager."
He can do that and win at Michigan where that does not work here.
We need a Beathard.
He can do that and win at Michigan where that does not work here.
We need a Beathard.
Agreed although the Michigan head coach upgrade probably has more to do with their improvement . That being said Rudock looked good last week
