No, we're not going to forget
- Thread starter naturalbornhawk
- Start date
You aren’t proving anything by posting this bullshit.
It's proving not everyone is as delusional and incapable of critical thinking as you are.
Me and the vast majority of the medical community? You got crazy Twitter doctor. Please let that sink in.
🤣
The irony.
You're one of the biggest dunces on this board, and that's truly saying something.
You are a flunky clown who doesn't even have the ability to hide it.
"Natural born"...🤣
You are evidence of the importance of easy access to abortion, dimwit. Finish your G.E.D. before speaking with adults.
What exactly are you even arguing? That people should still be getting vaccinated for COVID?
The fruits of their labors: Another ~dozen children with messed up immune systems, due to measles.
Yes, measles essentially "erases" immune system memory, making all of those who contract it susceptible to a myriad of other bacteria and viruses....
Science? When it's done right and not controlled by industry and those with conflicts of interest can be great.
How many industries have manipulated science to satisfy their own vested interestes? Tobacco, lead, glyphosate and GMOs, asbestos, amongst others. It's undeniable.
If you can't also recognize that you also must follow the money by now, then we have nothing more to discuss here.
We continue to post dozens and dozens of publications with NO connections to Pfizer or Moderna, published by career immunologists and scientists.
You ignore all of those and find random Youtube videos and Twitter posts.
Not remotely the same thing, Cletus.
Again, I’ll trust the vast majority of the medical community and science. You trust the kooks and right wing websites. But please realize who you are trusting. It’s silly of you. Especially when you try and lecture someone.
Last edited:
These question aren't meant to put you on the defensive.
What percentage of non-research doctors actually look at various studies from around the world in order to form their own conclusion?
When they look at studies, what weight do they give to statistical studies compared to clinical studies?
Is there any bias for practicing physicians to come to conclusions based on guidance from government agencies like CDC or NIH rather than their own research?
Notice you did not include "and those with conflicts of interest" for a reason. If you're still promoting the COVID vaccines at this point, for infants and children no less, you are operating under a conflict of interest. Period.
Last edited:
Good questions that I don’t have the answer for. I’m sure some of the doctors on this site old be able to answer these questions.
They RELY ON the research doctors and scientists.
Which we've posted dozens and dozens of publications for you, that you ignore, or claim are "Pfizer owned".
Hell, one of your idiot buddies popped off about one study because it came from lesser-known institutions and said "call me when Stanford, etc weigh in". So, I posted one recent article from Stanford, and that shut his ass up pretty quickly.
They do not have any "conflicts of interest", and are required to list those with the publications.
It seems you're blindly trusting a system that you have very little knowledge of. It's a system lead by humans, run by humans, with money as the driver. So I guess you'll have to forgive me if I don't just blindly trust that.
I think it is a safe bet. So do the majority of Americans.
MOST "practicing physicians" do not have the training, or experience, to "do their own research".
Which is why they rely on the career scientists and physicians who DO have the time. And the recommendations from their own medical societies, who DO the homework and get the straight info from the leading scientists.
This is what YOU do.
Blindly trusting random Twitter and Youtube videos, designed to get "advertising hits" from a bunch of uneducated rubes.
Yeah, it's a trust that has cost many their health, if not their lives.
LOLWUT?
When people find real risks and "A-ha!" moments in science, they publish them. Your premise that Pfizer "owns" all of these publications relies on a presumption that (literally) tens of thousands of independent researchers have just "fallen in line" with the Pfizer company line.
Which is simply preposterous on its face.
No; you're following what the science says.
Covid is STILL a Top Ten risk for pediatric mortality. One that is substantially mitigated by vaccinating kids.
Go look up what the American Pediatrics Society says. That's run by doctors and scientists, who vaccinate their own children.
How many deaths are the direct sure of a vaccine? Per year, per decade, ever?
"a vaccine"? Are we still talking about the COVID vax? The vaccine deaths are what people are still trying to figure out.
Duh. I just told you it's highly speculative at this point. You can't even commit your core argument or which vaccine you're referring to. Thanks for your effort but no thanks.
TRANSLATION: "There is no actual evidence anywhere, but I have to stick to the talking points pushed into my email and Twitter feeds on an hourly basis."
TRANSLATION: I'm not going to commit to a number when it's speculative. Some scientists are looking at the all-cause mortality data from several countries and stating the number of suspected deaths in the millions.
But you'll continue to pretend - based on your email and Twitter feeds - that it is 'rampant'....
I don't need a solid number that everyone can agree upon to acknowledge that my potential costs greatly outweigh my potential benefits. And it's not close.
We're pretty much talking about the COVID vaccines exclusively in this thread. How about we stick with those?
