Oh great a picture of the people who trust the fake news about all vaccines.
No, we're not going to forget
- Thread starter naturalbornhawk
- Start date
I trust science and the medical community. Glad I’m the fool in your story here.
Works both ways,.. If you don't trust the lemmings it's best to just not play the game.
YES
Post the studies they've conducted & published to support their position, and I'll reconsider.
Not really but ok. You trust the random guy on Twitter. I’ll trust the professionals.
The professionals get attacked, canned, and ridiculed and instantly labeled as a quack if they say what they really think. That's the problem.
The fact that there are people willing to risk everything should be very telling.
Could they really believe what they say? Of course? Could they be bat shit crazy? Yep
Nope, I got vaccinated,.. But after looking at the options I intentionally chose to bypass the MRNA approach.
The FDA recently added their 'black box' warning label to Ozempic. Is their bias and credibility acceptable to you?🙄
New York Post - Bias and Credibility
RIGHT-CENTER BIAS These media sources are slightly to moderately conservative in bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded wordsmediabiasfactcheck.com
Lifelong diarrhea, sudden death, suicidal thoughts, ad nauseam. Beats working out and eating healthy, eh? 🤡
Anti-vax freaks are running out of ammo. This clown could only come up with a thousand peer-reviewed articles on covid vaccine injuries. It just reeks of desperation, huh? 🤣
I agree. They simply continue to re-post the same bullshit, over and over and over.
Like you.
Post them. Just saying they're out there somewhere makes you even less credible than the youtube videos you claim to despise.
Not sure there's much of a demand for 'PhD's' that spend thousands of hours per year trolling fellow anonymous trolls and shilling for criminal pharmaceutical companies but who knows.....
Anti-vax freaks are running out of ammo. This clown could only come up with a thousand peer-reviewed articles on covid vaccine injuries. It just reeks of desperation, huh? 🤣
These types of things seem to happen a lot Joe. I wonder what's going on?
🙄
Wahlberg didn't wear this. It is photoshopped.
I see you've taken about as much time checking this fact as you do with your other idiotic takes.
Dunce.
Looks like the guy who is always demanding transcripts be linked because he's a well-published PhD who trusts only studies and despises propaganda YouTube videos is now resorting to posting propaganda YouTube videos.
Oh, how the mighty have fallen!
Another digitally altered image and you fell for it? 😂
Source image of plain black t-shirt in the link.
‘I’m a critical thinker!’
We're talking about Mark Wahlberg, and his donation of 1.3M masks to schoolkids, Cletus.
Go Google that if you need more verification.
Not that you can read, anyway...
Mark Wahlberg Donates 1.3 Million Face Masks To Students And Teachers
Dorchester native Mark Wahlberg has made a big donation to keep students and teachers safe during the coronavirus pandemic.
www.cbsnews.com
Accelerate's LifeToGo and Mark Wahlberg's Performance Inspired Donate 1.3 Million Masks To Schools Across The U.S.
/PRNewswire/ -- Accelerate360, LLC (Accelerate), in partnership with Mark Wahlberg and his Performance Inspired brand, today announced they have donated 1.3...
www.prnewswire.com
Mark Wahlberg donates 1.3 million face masks to students, teachers in San Antonio and other US cities
Actor Mark Wahlberg is aiding students and teachers across the nation in the fight against the <a href="https://www.ksat.com/topic/Coronavirus/" target=_blank>coronavirus</a> pandemic, including those in San Antonio.
Mark Wahlberg donates 1.3M masks to schools
Singer and actor Mark Wahlberg is making sure school children are staying healthy as they return to classrooms amid the coronavirus pandemic.
Mark Wahlberg's Performance Inspired Brand Is Donating 1.3 Million Masks to Schools in 13 States
Mark Wahlberg's Performance Inspired Brand teamed up with LifeToGo to donate 1.3 million masks to schools across 13 states
Mark Wahlberg Donates 1.3 Million Face Masks to Schools Around the Country
The disposable masks went to at-risk school districts in Chicago, Portland, San Antonio and more.
Mark Wahlberg donates 1.3 million masks to U.S. schools, including Florida
He also recorded a social media message thanking essential workers and teachers for the work they’ve done as the world combats COVID-19.
Mark Wahlberg donates 1.3 million masks to U.S. schools
Mark Wahlberg is doing his part to help keep students and teachers safe amid the coronavirus pandemic.
Mark Wahlberg donates 1.3 million masks to U.S. schools, including Florida
He also recorded a social media message thanking essential workers and teachers for the work they’ve done as the world combats COVID-19.
Mark Wahlberg donates 1.3M face masks to students, teachers across US
SAN ANTONIO, Texas (WOAI/KABB) – Actor Mark Wahlberg has donated 1. 3 million face masks to students and teachers around the country. San Antonio ISD officials say the district received 100,000 three-ply, disposable face masks to help combat the coronavirus pandemic. "We are thrilled to have...
turnto10.com
Mark Wahlberg's Performance Inspired Brand Is Donating 1.3 Million Masks to Schools in 13 States
Mark Wahlberg's Performance Inspired Brand teamed up with LifeToGo to donate 1.3 million masks to schools across 13 states
Not a single transcript to be found.
But apparently someone is triggered. Big time. 🤣
But apparently someone is triggered. Big time. 🤣
The same clown that says to trust the science is posting 4 yr old videos from an actor as if that proves masks are any more useful than tits on a lizard (they aren't). As far as I know, Wahlberg does NOT have a PhD in immunology or virology. He probably hasn't even read the Cochrane study on masks or he would never have wasted his money on such a worthless giveaway.
We included 12 trials (10 cluster‐RCTs) comparing medical/surgical masks versus no masks to prevent the spread of viral respiratory illness (two trials with healthcare workers and 10 in the community). Wearing masks in the community probably makes little or no difference to the outcome of influenza‐like illness (ILI)/COVID‐19 like illness compared to not wearing masks (risk ratio (RR) 0.95, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.84 to 1.09; 9 trials, 276,917 participants; moderate‐certainty evidence. Wearing masks in the community probably makes little or no difference to the outcome of laboratory‐confirmed influenza/SARS‐CoV‐2 compared to not wearing masks (RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.72 to 1.42; 6 trials, 13,919 participants; moderate‐certainty evidence). Harms were rarely measured and poorly reported (very low‐certainty evidence).
We pooled trials comparing N95/P2 respirators with medical/surgical masks (four in healthcare settings and one in a household setting). We are very uncertain on the effects of N95/P2 respirators compared with medical/surgical masks on the outcome of clinical respiratory illness (RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.45 to 1.10; 3 trials, 7779 participants; very low‐certainty evidence). N95/P2 respirators compared with medical/surgical masks may be effective for ILI (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.66 to 1.03; 5 trials, 8407 participants; low‐certainty evidence). Evidence is limited by imprecision and heterogeneity for these subjective outcomes. The use of a N95/P2 respirators compared to medical/surgical masks probably makes little or no difference for the objective and more precise outcome of laboratory‐confirmed influenza infection (RR 1.10, 95% CI 0.90 to 1.34; 5 trials, 8407 participants; moderate‐certainty evidence). Restricting pooling to healthcare workers made no difference to the overall findings. Harms were poorly measured and reported, but discomfort wearing medical/surgical masks or N95/P2 respirators was mentioned in several studies (very low‐certainty evidence).
One previously reported ongoing RCT has now been published and observed that medical/surgical masks were non‐inferior to N95 respirators in a large study of 1009 healthcare workers in four countries providing direct care to COVID‐19 patients.
Cochrane Says Review Does Not Show That ‘Face Masks Don’t Work’ Against Covid-19
Karla Soares-Weiser, Editor-in-Chief of the Cochrane Library, emphasized, “Many commentators have claimed that a recently-updated Cochrane Review shows that ‘masks don't work,’ which is an inaccurate and misleading interpretation.”
www.google.com
You are not very bright.
Has Cochrane ever retracted or updated or updated the study? No? Why not?
Cochrane Says Review Does Not Show That ‘Face Masks Don’t Work’ Against Covid-19
Karla Soares-Weiser, Editor-in-Chief of the Cochrane Library, emphasized, “Many commentators have claimed that a recently-updated Cochrane Review shows that ‘masks don't work,’ which is an inaccurate and misleading interpretation.”
You are not very bright.
Because they KNOW masks are absolutely useless.
You are an unintelligent creature.
🤣
They have openly stated that the results of their study/review did NOT say masks were useless. Their study/review was misunderstood by simpletons like yourself, mostly because they (you) were seeking information to support a predetermined conclusion, something that even undergraduate researchers know to be unprofessional and academically unacceptable.
This is well recorded, but I understand that it doesn't fit your failing narrative.
You are a dunce.
Don’t believe those who claim science proves masks don’t work | Lucky Tran
A new scientific review of the efficacy of masks is deeply flawed. That hasn’t stopped some from touting it
Here is another article disputing your claims.
You are wrong. It can't be that uncommon for you. Just accept it.
Mark Wahlberg's donations for masks make no statements, whatsoever, on their efficacy.
From the study linked in your bullshit article:Don’t believe those who claim science proves masks don’t work | Lucky Tran
A new scientific review of the efficacy of masks is deeply flawed. That hasn’t stopped some from touting itwww.theguardian.com
Here is another article disputing your claims.
You are wrong. It can't be that uncommon for you. Just accept it.
Here, we measured outward emissions of micron-scale aerosol particles by healthy humans performing various expiratory activities while wearing different types of medical-grade or homemade masks. Accordingly, we use the terminology “outward emission” when referring the to the particle emissions measured here. Therefore, the measurements reported here do not represent the absolute number of emitted particles and may underestimate contributions from particles that escape out the sides of the masks, but do allow relative comparisons between different conditions. The particle emission rates reported here from the APS are likely smaller than the total expiratory particle emission rates by, approximately, the ratio of the exhaled volumetric flowrate that enters the funnel to the APS sample rate.
Although no direct measurements of virus emission or infectivity were performed here, the results raise the possibility that shed fiber particulates from contaminated cotton masks might serve as sources of aerosolized fomites.
Wearing an unwashed single layer t-shirt (U-SL-T) mask (like the kid who carries the groceries to your car lol) while breathing yielded a significant increase in measured particle emission rates compared to no mask, increasing to a median of 0.61 particles/s. The rates for some participants (F1 and F4) exceeded 1 particle/s, representing a 384% increase from the median no-mask value.
the homemade U-SL-T and U-DL-T masks however yielded a significant increase in outward particle emission per second (or per cough) compared to no mask,
Wearing a surgical mask or KN95 respirator had no statistically significant effect on particle emission from jaw movement compared to no mask. In contrast, wearing all other types of homemade masks (SL-P, U-SL-T, and U-DL-T) substantially increased the particle emission rate,
There's more, but even you should get the picture by now. Masks are beyond useless; good for nothing more than making the sheep feel safe.
Out of the 78 papers analyzed in the review, only two actually studied masking during the Covid-19 pandemic. And both of those found that masks did protect wearers from Covid-19.
Everything said here. Many became a loudmouths, during and after the pandemic. I was, am guilty, also.
Stepping back, one can separate the shit from the manure.
