22% of the test subjects in the AZ trials had a Medically Attended Adverse Event.
Oh noes!! They had a sore arm!
22% of the test subjects in the AZ trials had a Medically Attended Adverse Event.
22% of the test subjects in the AZ trials had a Medically Attended Adverse Event. (The control subjects, whose ‘placebo’ was a meningitis vaccine, suffered MAAE’s at a rate of 11.7% which is a WHOLE ‘nother story). Maybe that’s why PfizerFDA, Inc. sued to keep their clinical trial data under lock and key for 75 years).
How is this not a crime? 🤷♂️
😆wonderful vaccines
Highly debatable at best, especially when you figure in alternative treatments.ended a pandemic a year or more earlier than how it would have naturally played out, with millions fewer deaths.
Another vaccine? Womp womp!OMG!!! You're RIGHT!!!
They had 33 deaths!!!
(in the placebo group....Womp womp)
22% of the test subjects in the AZ trials had a Medically Attended Adverse Event. (The control subjects, whose ‘placebo’ was a meningitis vaccine, suffered MAAE’s at a rate of 11.7% which is a WHOLE ‘nother story). Maybe that’s why PfizerFDA, Inc. sued to keep their clinical trial data under lock and key for 75 years).
How is this not a crime? 🤷♂️
Good reason to avoid meningitis injections along with the one(s) for covid.OMG!!! You're RIGHT!!!
They had 33 deaths!!!
(in the placebo group....Womp womp)
Good reason to avoid meningitis injections along with the one(s) for covid.
What's the elephant in the room?
Inhaled microfibers and microplastics from Chinese-made surgical masks worn by tens of millions of Americans duped by a bogus health crisis?What's the elephant in the room?
Inhaled microfibers and microplastics from Chinese-made surgical masks worn by tens of millions of Americans
Funny you should mention that. The industry is so corrupt and tainted that ‘saline placebo’ no longer means anything. As long as there’s saline in it and it goes to the control group it will get a wink and a nod from the FDA (or their British counterpart).The placebo was a saline injection, Cletus.
Says right in the study design.
Cidrap begs to differ.Except for those cotton cloth masks, that worked just as well.
Funny you should mention that. The industry is so corrupt and tainted that ‘saline placebo’ no longer means anything.
Cidrap begs to differ.
You're jumping from I don't know for certain whether I personally know people, to "everything I post". That's not a logical/reasonable connection.
Nobody put out more misinformation than the health authorities and the government (and Joe). Or haven't you been following along? It turns out I and the others here that post similarly were right about most things all along. Come on out of your dream world and into reality my man.
FUNFACT: Not everyone is genetically identical.
Another vaccine? Womp womp!
Trial participants to date are aged 18 years or over, who are healthy or have medically stable chronic diseases and are at increased risk for being exposed to the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Participants receive one or two intramuscular doses of a half dose (~2.5 x1010 viral particles) or full dose (~5x1010 viral particles) of AZD1222 or comparator, meningococcal vaccine MenACWY.LMAO!!!
You want "saline placebos" for vaccines; you got one, and JUST LIKE THE MASK STUDY you don't like the results.
Link?Cidrap supports it; this is a NEW study with NEW evidence, Cletus.
Trial participants to date are aged 18 years or over, who are healthy or have medically stable chronic diseases and are at increased risk for being exposed to the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Participants receive one or two intramuscular doses of a half dose (~2.5 x1010 viral particles) or full dose (~5x1010 viral particles) of AZD1222
That’s an after-the-fact manipulation of data, dolt.In your link, they compared to a saline placebo, Chief.
It's right in the protocol.
That’s an after-the-fact manipulation of data, dolt.
Right from the horse’s mouth.Uh, no. That's clearly in the link you'd posted for the study design. You can find that right at the top.
Right from the horse’s mouth.
Main objective of the trial | To estimate the efficacy and assess the safety, tolerability and reactogenicity (for substudy only) of 2 intramuscular (IM) doses of AZD1222 compared to saline placebo for the prevention of coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19). |
Right from the horse’s mouth.
Participants are randomised to receive two intramuscular doses of a full dose (~5x1010 viral particles) of AZD1222 or comparator, meningococcal vaccine MenACWY as first dose and a saline placebo as second dose. (astrazeneca.com)
Strictly saline placebos don’t cause 12% of the recipients to seek medical care for serious adverse events
“Because when you recruit old people, that happens.”
AstraZeneca doesn’t care about old people.
AZ considers the elderly throwaways.No; they DO care about old people.
That's WHY they included some of them in their clinical trials.
AZ considers the elderly throwaways.
Do they?
They included them in their clinical trial AND demonstrated that their vaccine is JUST AS SAFE as a saline placebo.
Uh, noThey identified a safety signal then deliberately passed that clot-inducing jab onto the elderly.
Post # 2005.What were you right on? You don't know one person personally that suffers from anything you post here. Why don't you come into reality? Look 6ft in front of your nose. You see any of the BS you spew? You don't. So STFU with your misinformation
But, but, but, a manager of mine got ringing in his ears once!?!?.
Post # 2005.
Of course he did. He was chair of the committee that approved all grant applications, and as such, signed off on every grant application. That's a well documented fact. It's a published procedure.Oh but we're just a bunch of tin foil hat-wearing conspiracy theorists.
In the recently released congressional transcript he admitted to basically being a rubber stamp: ‘…well, you know, I signed off on all these studies but I never really knew exactly what they were doing…’Of course he did. He was chair of the committee that approved all grant applications, and as such, signed off on every grant application. That's a well documented fact. It's a published procedure.