No, what I am saying is of the teams that have "bad" passing yardage, where are they in rushing yardage? If they can't pass the ball and can't run the ball, then they are just bad all the way around on offense. But when you can run the ball, you do not need a ton of passing yards. You need enough for however the game is going, but it's not like you need 300 yards passing when you are rushing for 250 plus. Depending on how the game is going, you might only need 100 yards passing. So what I am saying is using the stats of yardage of the passing game to decide if a team is good or bad as a passing team is kind of not such a good way to determine that. Now completion percentage might be a better indicator, who knows. Which all this goes back to a comment I made this summer how I would rather have an efficient QB then a QB with a big arm and how everyone was always saying "he has a cannon for an arm" whenever we would bring in a qb and we saw how that worked out for us. We have been thinking we need to pass the ball to open up the run game and here comes Lester saying no, we need to run the ball to open the passing game. So as fans we are still all getting our jocks in a bunch over the passing game, when really it seems to be coming along just fine. Yeah eventually we are going to struggle to run the ball, but we have shown that even with stacked boxes, it is hard to make us struggle in that area. I guess, yeah we are going to need to throw the ball, maybe this week, maybe next month, but if we don't need to throw much, why would we? Plus think about this. We are a dangerous team, because if we can run the ball with stacked boxes, imagine what is going to happen when the passing game takes a step forward and really makes them pay for stacking the box.